skip to main content
10.1145/3357419.3357423acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicicmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Patients' Acceptance of Information Published by Physicians in Online Health Communities: An Empirical Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 August 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

By means of obtaining health-related information published by physicians in online health communities (OHCs), patients are able to diagnose some simple diseases by themselves and then save queueing time, which can help optimize the allocation of medial resources and alleviate hospitals' congestion to a certain extent, However, some patients may be hesitant to adopt this information because of its shortcomings. This study established a research model based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to examine patients' acceptance of information published by physicians in OHCs. An online survey involving 453 Chinese participants was conducted to collect data, and 378 (83.4%) were valid. Structural equation modelling and partial least squares were adopted to analyze data and test hypotheses Results reveal that performance expectancy, social influence and attitude toward using technology positively influence their behavioral intention and ultimately influence usage behavior of adopting information in OHCs. Our findings suggest that OHCs should inspire the intention of users to use information in OHCs, enhance the management of information, strengthen OHCs' reputation to increase social influence, and improve the service level of OHCs.

References

  1. Luo, P., Chen, K., Wu, C., and Li, Y. 2018. Exploring the social influence of multichannel access in an online health community. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Tech. 69, 1 (Sep. 2018), 98--109. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23928.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Yan, Z., Wang, T., Chen, Y., and Zhang, H. 2016. Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Inform. Manage. 53, 5 (Jul. 2016), 643--653. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Berger, M., Wagner, T. H., and Baker, L. C. 2005. Internet use and stigmatized illness. Soc. Sci. Med. 61, 8 (Oct. 2005), 1821--1827. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.025.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Yan, L., and Tan, Y. 2014. Feeling blue? Go online: an empirical study of social support among patients. Inform. Syst. Res. 25, 4 (Dec. 2014), 690--709. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0538.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dobransky, K., and Hargittai, E. 2012. Inquiring minds acquiring wellness: Uses of online and offline sources for health information. Health. Commun. 27, 4 (Sep. 2012), 331--343. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.585451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Neter, E., and Brainin, E. 2012. eHealth literacy: Extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. J. Med. Internet. Res. 14, 1 (Jan. 2012), e19. DOI=http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1619.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Suri, V. R., Majid, S., Chang, Y. K., and Foo, S. 2016. Assessing the influence of health literacy on health information behaviors: A multi-domain skills-based approach. Patient. Educ. Couns. 99, 6 (Jun. 2016), 1038--1045. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS. Quart. 27,3 (Sep. 2003), 425--478. DOI=http://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Chang, I. C., and Hsu, H. M. 2012. Predicting medical staff intention to use an online reporting system with modified unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Telemed. J. E. Health. 18, 1 (Jan-Feb. 2012), 67--73. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0048.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Veer, A. J., Peeters, J. M., Brabers, A. E., Schellevis, F. G., Rademakers, J. J., and Francke, A. L. 2015. Determinants of the intention to use e-health by community dwelling older people. BMC. Health. Serv. Res. 15, 1 (Mar. 2015), 103. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0765-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lamberg, L. 2003. Online empathy for mood disorders. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 289, 23 (Jun. 2003), 3073--3077. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.23.3073.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jiang, S., and Street, R. L. 2017. Pathway linking Internet health information seeking to better health: A moderated mediation study. Health. Commun. 32, 8 (Aug. 2017),1024--1031. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1196514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Wu, B. 2018. Patient continued use of online health care communities: Web mining of patient-doctor communication. J. Med. Internet. Res. 20, 4 (Apr. 2018), e126. DOI=http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Cacciatore, M. A., Anderson, A. A., Choi, D. H., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Liang, X., Ladwig, P., Xenos, M. A., and Dudo, A. D. 2012. Coverage of emerging technologies: A comparison between print and online media. New. Media. Society. 14, 6 (Aug. 2012), 1039--1059. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812439061.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Huang, L. C., Ko, H. H. C., and Kuo, F. Y. 2007. Influential factors on physicians' behaviour towards the medical web messaging board: a qualitative exploration. Int. J. Electron. Healthc. 3, 2 (Jan. 2007), 220--231. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1504/IJEH.2007.013102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kaba, B., and Touré, B. 2014. Understanding information and communication technology behavioral intention to use: Applying the UTAUT model to social networking site adoption by young people in a least developed country. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Tech. 65, 8 (Aug. 2014), 1662--1674. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23069.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sun, J., and Lu, J. 2014. An empirical study on user acceptance of healthcare website. Int. J. Netw. Virt. Organ. 14, 1-2 (Jan. 2014), 57--73. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2014.065093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hennemann, S., Witthöft, M., Bethge, M., Spanier, K., Beutel, M. E., and Zwerenz, R. 2018. Acceptance and barriers to access of occupational e-mental health: cross-sectional findings from a health-risk population of employees. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 91, 3 (Apr. 2018), 305--316. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-017-1280-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Wong, W. S., Chen, P. P., Chow, Y. F., Wong, S., and Fielding, R. 2016. A study of the reliability and concurrent validity of the Chinese version of the pain medication attitude questionnaire (ChPMAQ) in a sample of Chinese patients with chronic pain. Pain. Medicine. 17, 6 (Feb. 2016), 1137--1144. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnv086.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Audrain-Pontevia, A. F., and Menvielle, L. 2018. Do online health communities enhance patient--physician relationship? An assessment of the impact of social support and patient empowerment. Health. Serv. Manage. Res. 31, 3 (Aug. 2018), 154--162. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1177/0951484817748462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Huh, J., Kwon, B. C., Kim, S. H., Lee, S., Choo, J., Kim, J., Choi, M. J., and Yi, J. S. 2016. Personas in online health communities. J. Biomed. Inform. 63 (Oct. 2016), 212--225. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.08.019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Laugesen, J., Hassanein, K., and Yuan, Y. 2015. The impact of Internet health information on patient compliance: A research model and an empirical study. J. Med. Internet. Res. 17, 6 (Jun. 2015), e143. DOI=http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Wiertz, C., and de Ruyter, K. 2016. Beyond the call of duty: Why customers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organ. Stud. 28, 3 (Jun. 2016):347--376. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Buysse, H. E., Coorevits, P., Van Maele, G., Hutse, A., Kaufman, J., Ruige, J., and De Moor, G. J. 2010. Introducing telemonitoring for diabetic patients: development of a telemonitoring 'Health Effect and Readiness' questionnaire. Int. J. Med. Inform. 79, 8 (Aug. 2010), 576--584. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.05.005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing. Res. 18, 1 (Aug. 1981), 39--50. DOI=http://doi.org/10.2307/3150980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Sobral, M. P., Costa, M. E., Schmidt, L., and Martins, M. V. 2017. Corrigendum: COMPI fertility problem stress scales is a brief, valid and reliable tool for assessing stress in patients seeking treatment. Hum. Reprod. 32, 2 (Feb. 2017), 375--382. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Lu, X, Zhang, R., Wu, W., Shang, X., and Liu, M. 2018. Relationship between Internet health information and patient compliance based on Trust: Empirical study. J. Med. Internet. Res. 20, 8 (Jul. 2018), e253. DOI=http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Katona, Z., Zubcsek, P. P., and Sarvary, M. 2011. Network effects and personal influences: The diffusion of an online social network. J. Marketing. Res. 48, 3 (Jun. 2011), 425--443. DOI=http://doi.org/10.2307/23033849.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Lee, Y. J., Hosanagar, K., and Tan, Y. 2015. Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Manage. Sci. 61, 9 (Apr. 2015), 2241--2258. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2082.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Li, D., Luo, Z., Ding, Y., Sun, G. Z., Sun, G. Z., Dai, X., Du, J., Zhang, J., and Kong, S. 2017. User-level microblogging recommendation incorporating social influence. User-level microblogging recommendation incorporating social influence. 68, 3 (Aug. 2016), 553--568. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23681.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Luo, P., Chen, K., and Wu, C. 2016. Measuring social influence for firm-level financial performance. Electron. Commer. R. A. 20 (Sep. 2016), 15--29. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2016.09.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Patients' Acceptance of Information Published by Physicians in Online Health Communities: An Empirical Study

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICICM '19: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Communication and Management
            August 2019
            210 pages
            ISBN:9781450371889
            DOI:10.1145/3357419

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 August 2019

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader