skip to main content
10.1145/3358961.3358974acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesclihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

MateBrun: serious game as a strategy to teach basic arithmetic operations for six-years-old children

Published:29 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a prototype serious games in the teaching of basic arithmetic operations for six-year-old children, in this case, the arithmetic operations are addition and subtraction. For this reason, an educational application based on the Unity game engine (version 2017.3) was built through the phased development methodology proposed by Aachak Lotfi, Belahbib Amine and Bouhorma Mohammed. This methodology allows testing or modifications every time an iteration is completed, and the arithmetic's exercises proposed are based on the Singapore pedagogical model that makes children discover the solution for themselves. The results obtained show that manipulate iconic objects, the child can abstract knowledge of the visual elements that the application displays and acquire skills in the resolution of mathematical operations.

References

  1. Understood. 2016. Erntender las dificultades de su hijo con las matemáticas, https://www.understood.org/es-mx/learning-attention-issues/child-learning-disabilities/math-issues/understanding-your-childs-trouble-with-mathGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Izurieta Jara, Verónica Isabel, and Carmen Elizabeth Vásquez Chimborazo. 2016. La discalculia en el rendimiento académico en el área de matemática de los niños de quinto grado de educación general básica paralelo "c" de la unidad educativa "Chunchi" cantón, Chunchi provincia Chimborazo período lectivo 2014--2015. BS thesis. Riobamba, UNACH 2016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Michael David R., and Sandra L. Chen. 2005. Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. Muska & Lipman/Premier-TradeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dongfeng Liu, Priscila Valdiviezo-Díaz, Guido Riofrio, Y Sun, and Rodrigo Barba. 2015. Integration of virtual labs into science e-learning. Procedia Computer Science 75 (2015): 95--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Alonso Tello, Carolina, Paula López Barriga, and Cruz Vicente. 2013. Creer tocando. Tendencias pedagógicas 21. 249--262.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Oscar Boude Figueredo, and Edgar Andrés Sosa. 2016. Juego serio: modelo teórico para su diseño y producción. En C. Parra (Ed.), Doctorado en Educación: Temas y conceptos (pp. 197--221). Chía, Colombia: Universidad de La Sabana.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa. 2013. Resultados educativos, retos hacia la excelencia, https://www.evaluacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2016/12/CIE_ResultadosEducativos-RetosExcelencia201611301.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Juan Ignacio Pozo. 1989. Teorías cognitivas del aprendizaje. Ediciones Morata.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanca Arteaga. 2016. Tocar las matemáticas con el Método Singapur. https://www.unir.net/educacion/revista/noticias/metodologia-singapur-tocando-las-matematicas/549201544255/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tigse Soto, and Cristhian Rolando. 2015. Técnicas didácticas y su influencia en la enseñanza de lengua y literatura, de los estudiantes del primer ciclo de educación básica de la escuela "Francisco Sandoval Pástor", de la parroquia El Triunfo, cantón La Maná, durante el periodo lectivo 2012--2013. BS thesis. LATACUNGA/UTC/2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ng, Swee Fong, and Kerry Lee. 2009. The model method: Singapore children's tool for representing and solving algebraic word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 282--313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Charles, Darryl, and Moira McAlister. 2004. Integrating ideas about invisible playgrounds from play theory into online educational digital games. International Conference on Entertainment Computing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mark JP Wolf, and Bernard Perron, 2003. The video game theory reader. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jennifer J. Vogel, David S. Vogel, Jan Cannon-Bowers, Clint Bowers, Kathryn Muse, Michael Wright, M. 2006. Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research 34.3. 229--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kokkalia Georgia, Athanasios Drigas, and Alexandra Economou. 2016. The role of games in special preschool education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 11.12. 30--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Judy Hornigold. 2015. Dyscalculia Pocketbook. Pocketbooks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. El Aachak Lotfi, Belahbib Amine, and Mohammed Bouhorma. 2014. Adaptation of rapid prototyping model for serious games development. Journal of Computer Science 2.2. 173--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pablo Torres-Carrión, Christian Sarmiento-Guerrero, Juan Carlos Torres-Diaz, and Luis Barba-Guamán. 2018. Educational Math Game for Stimulation of Children with Dyscalculia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Karen C. Fuson. 1992. Research on whole number addition and subtraction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Susan Lamon. 2012. Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. MateBrun: serious game as a strategy to teach basic arithmetic operations for six-years-old children

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CLIHC '19: Proceedings of the IX Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction
        September 2019
        233 pages
        ISBN:9781450376792
        DOI:10.1145/3358961

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 January 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate14of42submissions,33%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader