skip to main content
survey

Applications of Distributed Ledger Technologies to the Internet of Things: A Survey

Published: 14 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLTs) and blockchain systems have received enormous academic, government, and commercial interest in recent years. This article surveys the integration of DLTs within another life-changing technology, the Internet of Things (IoT). IoT-based applications, such as smart home, smart transport, supply chain, smart healthcare, and smart energy, promise to boost the efficiency of existing infrastructures and change every facet of our daily life. This article looks into the challenges faced by such applications and reviews a comprehensive selection of existing DLT solutions to those challenges. We also identify issues for future research, including DLT security and scalability, multi-DLT applications, and survival of DLT in the post-quantum world.

References

[1]
ITU Internet Reports 2005: The Internet of Things. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/pub/S-POL-IR.IT-2005/e.
[2]
M. Hung. Leading the IoT, Reports. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/imagesrv/books/iot/iotEbook_digital.pdf.
[3]
Internet of Things (IoT) Market: Global Demand, Growth Analysis 8 Opportunity Outlook 2023, Research Reports. Retrieved from https://www.researchnester.com/reports/internet-of-things-iot-market-global-demand-growth-analysis-opportunity-outlook-2023/216.
[4]
L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito. 2010. The internet of things: A survey. Comput. Netw. 54, 15 (2010), 2787--2805.
[5]
A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, et al. 2015. Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 17, 4 (2015), 2347--2376.
[6]
D. L. Xu, W. He, and S. Li. 2014. Internet of things in industries: A survey. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 10, 4 (2014), 2233--2243.
[7]
K. Christidis and M. Devetsikiotis. 2016. Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access 4 (2016), 2292--2303.
[8]
F. Tschorsch and B. Scheuermann. 2016. Bitcoin and beyond: A technical survey on decentralized digital currencies. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 18, 3 (2016), 2084--2123.
[9]
M. Conti, S. Kumar, C. Lal, et al. 2018. A survey on security and privacy issues of bitcoin. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 20, 4 (2018), 3416--3452.
[10]
M. C. K. Khalilov and A. Levi. 2018. A survey on anonymity and privacy in bitcoin-like digital cash systems. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 20, 3 (2018), 2543--2585.
[11]
T. Salman, M. Zolanvari, A. Erbad, et al. 2018. Security services using blockchains: A state of the art survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21, 1 (2018), 858--880.
[12]
M. Conoscenti, A. Vetro, and J. C. De Martin. 2016. Blockchain for the Internet of Things: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACS 13th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA’16). IEEE, 1--6.
[13]
M. A. Khan and K. Salah. 2018. IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 82 (2018), 395--411.
[14]
K. Yeow, A. Gani, R. W. Ahmad, et al. 2018. Decentralized consensus for edge-centric Internet of Things: A review, taxonomy, and research issues. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 1513--1524.
[15]
E. F. Jesus, V. R. L. Chicarino, C. V. N. de Albuquerque, et al. 2018. A survey of how to use blockchain to secure internet of things and the stalker attack. Security and Communication Networks Article 9675050 (2018), 27 pages.
[16]
T. M. Fernández-Caramés and P. Fraga-Lamas. 2018. A review on the use of blockchain for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 32979--33001.
[17]
A. Reyna, C. Martín, J. Chen, et al. 2018. On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 88 (2018), 173--190.
[18]
A. Panarello, N. Tapas, G. Merlino, et al. 2018. Blockchain and iot integration: A systematic survey. Sensors 18, 8 (2018), 2575.
[19]
T. M. Fernández-Caramés and P. Fraga-Lamas. 2019. A review on the application of blockchain to the next generation of cybersecure industry 4.0 smart factories. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 45201--45218.
[20]
M. Walport. 2016. Distributed ledger technology: Beyond blockchain. UK Government Office for Science[R]. Technical Report 2016.
[21]
S. Nakamoto. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
[22]
S. Popov. The Tangle. Retrieved from https://assets.ctfassets.net/r1dr6vzfxhev/2t4uxvsIqk0EUau6g2sw0g/45eae33637ca92f85dd9f4a3a218e1ec/iota1_4_3.pdf.
[23]
A. Churyumov. Byteball: A Decentralized System for Storage and Transfer of Value. Retrieved from https://byteball.org/Byteball.pdf.
[24]
F. M. Benčić and I. P. Žarko 2018. Distributed ledger technology: Blockchain compared to directed acyclic graph. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’18). 1569--1570.
[25]
R. Schollmeier. 2001. A definition of peer-to-peer networking for the classification of peer-to-peer architectures and applications. In Proceedings of 1st IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing. 101--102.
[26]
A. M. Antonopoulos. 2014. Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2014).
[27]
S. King and S. Nadal. 2012. Ppcoin: Peer-to-peer crypto-currency with proof-of-stake. Self-published paper, August 2012, 19.
[28]
G. T. Nguyen and K. Kim. 2018. A survey about consensus algorithms used in blockchain. J. Inf. Process. Syst. 14, 1 (2018), 101--128.
[29]
Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index. Retrieved from https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption.
[30]
V. Buterin. On Stake. Retrieved from https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/07/05/stake/.
[31]
Nxt Whitepaper. Retrieved from https://bravenewcoin.com/assets/Whitepapers/NxtWhitepaper-v122-rev4.pdf.
[32]
M. Ghosh, M. Richardson, B. Ford, et al. 2014. A TorPath to TorCoin: Proof-of-bandwidth altcoins for compensating relays. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Hot Topics in Privacy Enhancing Technologies (HotPETs’14).
[33]
M. Castro and B. Liskov. 1999. Practical Byzantine fault tolerance. In Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 173--186.
[34]
Hyperledger. Retrieved from https://www.hyperledger.org/.
[35]
D. Schwartz, N. Youngs, and A. Britto. The Ripple protocol consensus algorithm. Ripple Labs Inc White Paper. Retrieved from http://ripple.com/files/ripple_consensus_whitepaper.pdf.
[36]
R3. Retrieved from https://www.r3.com/.
[37]
Stellar. Retrieved from https://www.stellar.org/.
[38]
BigChainDB. Retrieved from https://www.bigchaindb.com/.
[39]
Hashgraph. Retrieved from https://www.hederahashgraph.com/.
[40]
Dagcoin. Retrieved from https://dogecoin.com/.
[41]
V. Buterin, V. Griffith. Casper the friendly finality gadget. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.09437.
[42]
The Mixin Network. Retrieved from https://mixin.one/.
[43]
N. Szabo. 1997. Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday 2, 9 (1997).
[44]
V. Buterin. A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Retrieved from https://cryptorating.eu/whitepapers/Ethereum/Ethereum_white_paper.pdf.
[45]
Deloitte, Blockchain Technology—A game-changer in accounting? Research Reports. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/de/Documents/Innovation/Blockchain_A%20game-changer%20in%20accounting.pdf.
[46]
Y. Yang, L. Wu, G. Yin, et al. 2017. A survey on security and privacy issues in internet-of-things. IEEE IoT J. 4, 5 (2017), 1250--1258.
[47]
S. Sicari, A. Rizzardi, L. A. Grieco, et al. 2015. Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead. Comput. Netw. 76 (2015), 146--164.
[48]
A. Yakubov, W. Shbair, A. Wallbom, et al. 2018. A blockchain-based PKI management framework. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE/IFIP International Workshop on Managing and Managed by Blockchain (Man2Block’18) Colocated with IEEE/IFIP NOMS 2018.
[49]
H. Orman. 2018. Blockchain: The emperors new PKI? IEEE Internet Comput. 22, 2 (2018), 23--28.
[50]
G. Pinto, J. P. Dias, and H. S. Ferreira. 2018. Blockchain-based PKI for crowdsourced IoT sensor information. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR’18). 248--257.
[51]
B. Liu, X. L. Yu, S. Chen, et al. 2017. Blockchain based data integrity service framework for IoT data. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS’17). 468--475.
[52]
A. Ouaddah, H. Mousannif, A. A. Elkalam, et al. 2017. Access control in the Internet of things: Big challenges and new opportunities. Comput. Netw. 112 (2017), 237--262.
[53]
D. D. F. Maesa, P. Mori, and L. Ricci. 2017. Blockchain based access control. In Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Distributed Applications and Interoperable Systems. Springer, Cham, 206--220.
[54]
H. Es-Samaali, A. Outchakoucht, and J. P. Leroy. 2017. A blockchain-based access control for big data. Int. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. Secur. 5, 7 (2017), 137.
[55]
A. Ouaddah, A. A. Elkalam, and A. A. Ouahman. 2017. Towards a novel privacy-preserving access control model based on blockchain technology. In IoT[M]//Europe and MENA Cooperation: Advances in Information and Communication Technologies. Springer, Cham, 523--533.
[56]
A. Ouaddah, A. Abou Elkalam, and A. Ait Ouahman. 2016. FairAccess: A new Blockchain-based access control framework for the Internet of Things. Secur. Commun. Netw. 9, 18 (2016), 5943--5964.
[57]
A. Ouaddah, A. A. Elkalam, and A. Ouahman. 2017. Harnessing the power of blockchain technology to solve IoT security 8 privacy issues. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Internet of Things and Data Cloud Computing (ICC’17). ACM, 2017.
[58]
Y. Zhang, S. Kasahara, Y. Shen, et al. 2019. Smart contract-based access control for the Internet of Things. IEEE IoT J. 6, 2 (2019), 1594--1605.
[59]
N. Rifi, E. Rachkidi, N. Agoulmine, et al. 2017. Towards using blockchain technology for IoT data access protection. In Proceedings of the IEEE 17th International Conference on Ubiquitous Wireless Broadband (ICUWB’17). IEEE, 1--5.
[60]
G. G. Dagher, J. Mohler, M. Milojkovic, et al. 2018. Ancile: Privacy-preserving framework for access control and interoperability of electronic health records using blockchain technology. Sust. Cit. Soc. 39 (2018), 283--297.
[61]
O. Novo. 2018. Blockchain meets IoT: An architecture for scalable access management in IoT. IEEE IoT J. 5, 2 (2018), 1184--1195.
[62]
O. J. A. Pinno, A. R. A. Gregio, and L. C. E. De Bona. 2017. ControlChain: Blockchain as a central enabler for access control authorizations in the IoT. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM’17). IEEE, 1--6.
[63]
A. Dorri, S. S. Kanhere, R. Jurdak, et al. 2017. LSB: A lightweight scalable blockchain for IoT security and privacy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.02969 (2017).
[64]
G. Zyskind, O. Nathan, and A. Pentland. 2015. Enigma: Decentralized computation platform with guaranteed privacy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.03471 (2015).
[65]
T. Hardjono and N. Smith. 2016. Cloud-based commissioning of constrained devices using permissioned blockchains. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on IoT Privacy, Trust, and Security. ACM, 29--36.
[66]
A. Moinet, B. Darties, and J. L. Baril. 2017. Blockchain based trust 8 authentication for decentralized sensor networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.01730 (2017).
[67]
R. D. Pietro, X. Salleras, M. Signorini, et al. 2018. A blockchain-based distributed Trust System for the Internet of Things[c]. In Proceedings of the 23nd ACM on Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies (SACMAT’18). 77--83.
[68]
N. Alexopoulos, S. M. Habib, M. Mühlhäuser. 2018. Towards secure distributed trust management on a global scale: An analytical approach for applying Distributed Ledgers for authorization in the IoT. In Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on IoT Security and Privacy. ACM, 49--54.
[69]
J. Lin, Z. Shen, and C. Miao. 2017. Using blockchain technology to build trust in sharing LoRaWAN IoT. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering. ACM, 38--43.
[70]
M. T. Hammi, B. Hammi, P. Bellot, et al. 2018. Bubbles of trust: A decentralized blockchain-based authentication system for IoT. Comput. Secur. 78 (2018), 126--142.
[71]
J. Groopman and J. Owyang. The Internet of Trusted Things: Blockchain as the Foundation for Autonomous Products 8 Ecosystem Services. Retrieved from http://www.kaleidoinsights.com/.
[72]
A. Bochem, B. Leiding, and D. Hogrefe. 2018. Unchained Identities: Putting a Price on Sybil Nodes in Mobile Ad hoc Networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Networks (SecureComm’18).
[73]
D. W. Kravitz and J. Cooper. 2017. Securing user identity and transactions symbiotically: IoT meets blockchain. In Proceedings of the Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS’17). IEEE, 1--6.
[74]
C. Lin, D. He, X. Huang, et al. 2018. A new transitively closed undirected graph authentication scheme for blockchain-based identity management systems. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 28203--28212.
[75]
R. Li, T. Song, B. Mei, et al. 2018. Blockchain for large-scale internet of things data storage and protection. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 12, 5 (2018), 762--771.
[76]
M. M. Aung and Y. S. Chang. 2014. Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives. Food Contr. 39 (2014), 172--184.
[77]
P. Lin, M. Li, X. Kong, et al. 2018. Synchronisation for smart factory-towards IoT-enabled mechanisms. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manufact. 31, 7 (2018), 624--635.
[78]
R. K. Lomotey, J. Pry, and S. Sriramoju. 2017. Wearable IoT data stream traceability in a distributed health information system. Perv. Mobile Comput. 40 (2017), 692--707.
[79]
H. Shafagh, L. Burkhalter, A. Hithnawi, et al. 2017. Towards blockchain-based auditable storage and sharing of iot data. In Proceedings of the 2017 on Cloud Computing Security Workshop. ACM, 45--50.
[80]
S. Suzuki and J. Murai. 2017. Blockchain as an audit-able communication channel. In Proceedings of the IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC’17). 516--522.
[81]
A. Boudguiga, N. Bouzerna, L. Granboulan, et al. 2017. Towards better availability and accountability for iot updates by means of a blockchain. In Proceedings of the IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS8PW’17). IEEE, 50--58.
[82]
S. Huckle, R. Bhattacharya, M. White, et al. 2016. Internet of things, blockchain and shared economy applications. Proc. Comput. Sci. 98 (2016), 461--466.
[83]
Y. Zhang and J. Wen. 2017. The IoT electric business model: Using blockchain technology for the internet of things. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 10, 4 (2017), 983--994.
[84]
T. Lundqvist, A. de Blanche, and H. R. H. Andersson. 2017. Thing-to-thing electricity micro payments using blockchain technology. In Proceedings of the Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS’17). IEEE, 1--6.
[85]
N. Komninos, E. Philippou, and A. Pitsillides. 2014. Survey in smart grid and smart home security: Issues, challenges and countermeasures. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 16, 4 (2014), 1933--1954.
[86]
A. Dorri, S. S. Kanhere, and R. Jurdak. 2016. Blockchain in internet of things: Challenges and solutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.05187 (2016).
[87]
A. Dorri, S. S. Kanhere, R. Jurdak, et al. 2017. Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops’17). 618--623.
[88]
A. Dorri, S. S. Kanhere, and R. Jurdak. 2017. Towards an optimized blockchain for IoT. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation. ACM, 173--178.
[89]
Y. N. Aung and T. Tantidham. 2017. Review of Ethereum: Smart home case study. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Information Technology (INCIT’17). 1--4.
[90]
C. Qu, M. Tao, and R. Yuan. 2018. A hypergraph-based blockchain model and application in Internet of Things-enabled smart homes. Sensors 18, 9 (2018), 2784.
[91]
A. Dorri, M. Steger, S. S. Kanhere, et al. 2017. Blockchain: A distributed solution to automotive security and privacy. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55, 12 (2017), 119--125.
[92]
A. Lei, H. Cruickshank, Y. Cao, et al. 2017. Blockchain-based dynamic key management for heterogeneous intelligent transportation systems. IEEE IoT. J. 4, 6 (2017), 1832--1843.
[93]
R. A. Michelin, A. Dorri, R. C. Lunardi, et al. 2018. SpeedyChain: A framework for decoupling data from blockchain for smart cities. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.01980 (2018).
[94]
L. Li, J. Liu, L. Cheng, et al. 2018. CreditCoin: A privacy-preserving blockchain-based incentive announcement network for communications of smart vehicles. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 19, 7 (2018), 2204--2220.
[95]
V. Ortega, F. Bouchmal, J. F. Monserrat. 2018. Trusted 5G vehicular networks: Blockchains and content-centric networking. IEEE Vehic. Technol. Mag. 13, 2 (2018), 121--127.
[96]
M. Singh and S. Kim. 2018. Branch based blockchain technology in intelligent vehicle. Comput. Netw. 145 (2018), 219--231.
[97]
Z. Lu, Q. Wang, G. Qu, et al. 2018. Bars: A blockchain-based anonymous reputation system for trust management in vanets. In Proceedings of the 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications/12th IEEE International Conference on Big Data Science and Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE’18). IEEE, 98--103.
[98]
Z. Lu, W. Liu, Q. Wang, et al. 2018. A privacy-preserving trust model based on blockchain for VANETs. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 45655--45664.
[99]
Z. Yang, K. Zheng, K. Yang, et al. 2017. A blockchain-based reputation system for data credibility assessment in vehicular networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium, Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC’17). 1--5.
[100]
Z. Su, Y. Wang, Q. Xu, et al. 2018. A secure charging scheme for electric vehicles with smart communities in energy blockchain. IEEE IoT J. 6, 3 (2018), 4601--4613.
[101]
C. Liu, K. K. Chai, X. Zhang, et al. 2018. Adaptive blockchain-based electric vehicle participation scheme in smart grid platform. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 25656--25665.
[102]
X. Huang, C. Xu, P. Wang, et al. 2018. Lnsc: A security model for electric vehicle and charging pile management based on blockchain ecosystem. IEEE Access 99 (2018), 1--1.
[103]
J. Kang, R. Yu, X. Huang, et al. 2017. Enabling localized peer-to-peer electricity trading among plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using consortium blockchains. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 13, 6 (2017), 3154--3164.
[104]
H. Liu, Y. Zhang, and T. Yang. 2018. Blockchain-enabled security in electric vehicles cloud and edge computing. IEEE Netw. 32, 3 (2018), 78--83.
[105]
F. Knirsch, A. Unterweger, and D. Engel. 2018. Privacy-preserving blockchain-based electric vehicle charging with dynamic tariff decisions. Comput. Sci. Res. Dev. 33, 1--2 (2018), 71--79.
[106]
F. Lamberti, V. Gatteschi, C. Demartini, et al. Blockchain or not blockchain, that is the question of the insurance and other sectors. IT Pro. (Early Access).
[107]
F. Lamberti, V. Gatteschi, C. Demartini, et al. 2018. Blockchains can work for car insurance: Using smart contracts and sensors to provide on-demand coverage. IEEE Cons. Electr. Mag. 7, 4 (2018), 72--81.
[108]
C. Oham, S. S. Kanhere, R. Jurdak, et al. 2018. A blockchain based liability attribution framework for autonomous vehicles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05050 (2018).
[109]
C. Oham, R. Jurdak, S. S. Kanhere, et al. 2018. B-FICA: BlockChain based framework for auto-insurance claim and adjudication. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData), Halifax, NS, Canada, (2018), 1171--1180.
[110]
C. Konstantinos. 2016. Blockchains and smart contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access 4, 5 (2016), 2292--303.
[111]
D. Miller. 2018. Blockchain and the Internet of Things in the industrial sector. IT Pro. 20, 3 (2018), 15--18.
[112]
Q. Lu and X. Xu. 2017. Adaptable blockchain-based systems: A case study for product traceability. IEEE Softw. 34, 6 (2017), 21--27.
[113]
Z. Gao, L. Xu, L. Chen, et al. 2018. Coc: A unified distributed ledger based supply chain management system. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 33, 2 (2018), 237--248.
[114]
H. Wu, Z. Li, B. King, et al. 2017. A distributed ledger for supply chain physical distribution visibility. Information 8, 4 (2017), 137.
[115]
K. Leng, Y. Bi, L. Jing, et al. 2018. Research on agricultural supply chain system with double chain architecture based on blockchain technology. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 86 (2018), 641--649.
[116]
J. F. Galvez, J. C. Mejuto, and J. Simal-Gandara. 2018. Future challenges on the use of blockchain for food traceability analysis. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 107 (2018), 222--232.
[117]
D. Mao, F. Wang, Z. Hao, et al. 2018. Credit evaluation system based on blockchain for multiple stakeholders in the food supply chain. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 15, 8 (2018), 1627.
[118]
Skuchain Brackets—Blockchain Technology for Collaborative Commerce. Retrieved from https://www.skuchain.com/.
[119]
M. Mettler. 2016. Blockchain technology in healthcare: The revolution starts here. In Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom’16). 1--3.
[120]
Q. Xia, E. B. Sifah, K. O. Asamoah, et al. 2017. MeDShare: Trust-less medical data sharing among cloud service providers via blockchain. IEEE Access 5 (2017), 14757--14767.
[121]
K. Fan, S. Wang, Y. Ren, et al. 2018. MedBlock: Efficient and secure medical data sharing via blockchain. J. Med. Syst. 42, 8 (2018), 136.
[122]
A. Zhang and X. Lin. 2018. Towards secure and privacy-preserving data sharing in e-health systems via consortium blockchain. J. Med. Syst. 42, 8 (2018), 140.
[123]
C. Esposito, A. De Santis, G. Tortora, et al. 2018. Blockchain: A panacea for healthcare cloud-based data security and privacy? IEEE Cloud Comput. 5, 1 (2018), 31--37.
[124]
J. Zhang, N. Xue, and X. Huang. 2016. A secure system for pervasive social network-based healthcare. IEEE Access 4 (2016), 9239--9250.
[125]
K. N. Griggs, O. Ossipova, C. P. Kohlios, et al. 2018. Healthcare blockchain system using smart contracts for secure automated remote patient monitoring. J. Med. Syst. 42, 7 (2018), 130.
[126]
X. Liang, J. Zhao, S. Shetty, et al. 2017. Integrating blockchain for data sharing and collaboration in mobile healthcare applications. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC’17). IEEE, 1--5.
[127]
M. A. Uddin, A. Stranieri, I. Gondal, et al. 2018. Continuous patient monitoring with a patient centric agent: A block architecture. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 32700--32726.
[128]
H. T. Wu and C. W. Tsai. 2018. Toward blockchains for health-care systems: Applying the bilinear pairing technology to ensure privacy protection and accuracy in data sharing. IEEE Cons. Electr. Mag. 7, 4 (2018), 65--71.
[129]
R. Guo, H. Shi, Q. Zhao, et al. 2018. Secure attribute-based signature scheme with multiple authorities for Blockchain in electronic health records systems. IEEE Access 776, 99 (2018), 1--12.
[130]
J. Gao, K. O. Asamoah, E. B. Sifah, et al. 2018. GridMonitoring: Secured sovereign blockchain based monitoring on smart grid. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 9917--9925.
[131]
Z. Guan, G. Si, X. Zhang, et al. 2018. Privacy-preserving and efficient aggregation based on blockchain for power grid communications in smart communities. IEEE Commun. Mag. 56, 7 (2018), 82--88.
[132]
C. Rottondi and G. Verticale. 2017. A privacy-friendly gaming framework in smart electricity and water grids. IEEE Access 5 (2017), 14221--14233.
[133]
N. Z. Aitzhan and D. Svetinovic. 2018. Security and privacy in decentralized energy trading through multi-signatures, blockchain and anonymous messaging streams. IEEE Trans. Depend. Sec. Comput. 15, 5 (2018), 840--852.
[134]
Z. Li, J. Kang, R. Yu, et al. 2018. Consortium blockchain for secure energy trading in industrial internet of things. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 14, 8 (2018), 3690--3700.
[135]
K. Biswas and V. Muthukkumarasamy. 2016. Securing smart cities using blockchain technology. In Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, the IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City, and the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS’16). 1392--1393.
[136]
S. Ibba, A. Pinna, M. Seu, et al. 2017. CitySense: Blockchain-oriented smart cities. In Proceedings of the XP2017 Scientific Workshops. ACM, 12.
[137]
P. K. Sharma, S. Rathore, and J. H. Park. 2018. DistArch-SCNet: Blockchain-based distributed architecture with Li-Fi communication for a scalable smart city network. IEEE Cons. Electr. Mag. 7, 4 (2018), 55--64.
[138]
N. Tapas, G. Merlino, and F. Longo. 2018. Blockchain-based IoT-cloud authorization and delegation. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP’18). IEEE, 411--416.
[139]
F. Longo, D. Bruneo, S. Distefano, G. Merlino, and A. Puliafito. 2017. Stack4Things: A sensing-and-actuation-as-a-service framework for IoT and cloud integration. Ann. Telecommun. 72, 1--2 (2017), 53--70.
[140]
R. M. Parizi, A. Dehghantanha, K. K. R. Choo, et al. 2018. Empirical vulnerability analysis of automated smart contracts security testing on blockchains. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.02702 (2018).
[141]
F. M. Ablayev, D. A. Bulychkov, D. A. Sapaev, A. V. Vasiliev, and M. T. Ziatdinov. 2018. Quantum-assisted blockchain. Lobachev. J. Math. 39, 7 (Sep. 2018), 957--960.
[142]
D. Aggarwal, G. Brennen, T. Lee, M. Santha, and M. Tomamichel. 2018. Quantum attacks on bitcoin, and how to protect against them. Ledger 3 (2018), 68--90.
[143]
U. Banerjee, A. Pathak, and A. P. Chandrakasan. 2019. An energy-efficient configurable lattice cryptography processor for the quantum-secure internet of things. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference (ISSCC’19). 46--48.
[144]
N. Fernando, S. W. Loke, and W. Rahayu. 2013. Mobile cloud computing: A survey. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 1 (Jan. 2013), 84--106.
[145]
James Howe, Tobias Oder, Markus Krausz, and Tim Güneysu. 2018. Standard lattice-based key encapsulation on embedded devices. IACR Trans. Cryptogr. Hardw. Embed. Syst. 2018, 3 (Aug. 2018), 372--393.
[146]
H. Nejatollahi, N. Dutt, S. Ray, F. Regazzoni, I. Banerjee, and R. Cammarota. 2019. Post-quantum lattice-based cryptography implementations: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 51, 6 (Jan. 2019), 129:1--129:41.
[147]
I. Psaras. 2018. Decentralised edge-computing and iot through distributed trust. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys’18). ACM, New York, NY, 505--507.
[148]
D. Rajan and M. Visser. 2019. Quantum blockchain using entanglement in time. Quant. Rep. 1, 1 (2019), 3--11.
[149]
P. Rizun. 2016. Subchains: A technique to scale bitcoin and improve the user experience. Ledger 1 (2016), 38--52.
[150]
Dapp statistics. Retrieved from https://www.stateofthedapps.com/stats.
[151]
Hyperledger Fabric. Retrieved from https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/fabric.
[152]
IBM Watson IoT Platform. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/internet-of-things/solutions/iot-platform/watson-iot-platform.
[153]
Hyperledger Burrow. Retrieved from https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/hyperledger-burrow.
[154]
Hyperledger Indy. Retrieved from https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/hyperledger-indy.
[155]
Hyperledger Iroha. Retrieved from https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/iroha.
[156]
Hyperledger Sawtooth. Retrieved from https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/sawtooth.
[157]
Hyperledger Grid. Retrieved from https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/grid.
[158]
Statistics of IOTA. Retrieved from https://thetangle.org/live.
[159]
IoT Chain. Retrieved from https://iotchain.io/.
[160]
IoTex. Retrieved from https://iotex.io/.
[161]
Bitshares. Retrieved from https://bitshares.org/.
[162]
S. Micali, M. Rabin, and S. Vadhan. 1999. Verifiable random functions. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, 120--130.
[163]
HDAC. Retrieved from https://www.hdactech.com/en/ index.do.
[164]
Streamr. Retrieved from https://www.streamr.com/.
[165]
Atonomi. Retrieved from https://atonomi.io/.
[166]
Ambrosus. Retrieved from https://ambrosus.com/.
[167]
OriginTrail. Retrieved from https://origintrail.io/.
[168]
Grid+. Retrieved from https://gridplus.io/.
[169]
Power Ledger. Retrieved from https://www.powerledger.io/.
[170]
EcoChain. Retrieved from https://ecochain.com/.
[171]
Doc.ai. Retrieved from https://doc.ai/.
[172]
How Bumble Bee Uses Blockchain to Track and Trace Your Fish? Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/sap/2019/03/11/video-how-bumble-bee-uses-blockchain-to-track-and-trace-your-fish/#5c05ae7f3690.
[173]
Veracity Protocol. Retrieved from https://veracityprotocol.org/.
[174]
Pairing AI with Optical Scanning for Real-World Product Authentication. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/blogs/research/2018/05/ai-authentication-verifier/.
[175]
Different Types of Blockchains in the Market and Why We Need Them? Retrieved from https://coinsutra.com/different-types-blockchains/.
[176]
ISO/TC 307. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/committee/6266604.html.
[177]
IEEE Standrds. Retrieved from https://blockchain.ieee.org/standards.
[178]
Blocknet. Retrieved from https://blocknet.co/.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024) A smart decentralized identifiable distributed ledger technology‐based blockchain ( DIDLT‐BC ) model for cloud‐IoT security Expert Systems10.1111/exsy.1354442:1Online publication date: 19-Jan-2024
  • (2024)A Survey on IOTA Based Technology for Enhanced IoT Security2024 11th International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM)10.1109/WINCOM62286.2024.10655373(1-6)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
  • (2024)JABS: A Blockchain Simulator for Researching Consensus AlgorithmsIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering10.1109/TNSE.2023.328291611:1(3-13)Online publication date: Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Computing Surveys
ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 52, Issue 6
November 2020
806 pages
ISSN:0360-0300
EISSN:1557-7341
DOI:10.1145/3368196
  • Editor:
  • Sartaj Sahni
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 November 2019
Accepted: 01 August 2019
Revised: 01 August 2019
Received: 01 May 2019
Published in CSUR Volume 52, Issue 6

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Distributed ledger technologies
  2. Internet of things
  3. blockchain

Qualifiers

  • Survey
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology
  • Natural Science Foundation of China

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)151
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024) A smart decentralized identifiable distributed ledger technology‐based blockchain ( DIDLT‐BC ) model for cloud‐IoT security Expert Systems10.1111/exsy.1354442:1Online publication date: 19-Jan-2024
  • (2024)A Survey on IOTA Based Technology for Enhanced IoT Security2024 11th International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM)10.1109/WINCOM62286.2024.10655373(1-6)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
  • (2024)JABS: A Blockchain Simulator for Researching Consensus AlgorithmsIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering10.1109/TNSE.2023.328291611:1(3-13)Online publication date: Jan-2024
  • (2024)ZIADA: Zero Trust-Based Identity Attestation Framework for DLT Verified AI-Enabled Industrial Internet of Things2024 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP)10.1109/TENSYMP61132.2024.10752149(1-6)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Distributed Ledger Design and Consistency Maintenance Algorithm for Digitalization of Property Rights2024 International Conference on Telecommunications and Power Electronics (TELEPE)10.1109/TELEPE64216.2024.00056(278-283)Online publication date: 29-May-2024
  • (2024)ZAIA: Zero-trust Authentication and Identity Attestation Framework for AI-Enabled IIoTs in Smart Manufacturing Ecosystem2024 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Signal Processing and Effective Communication Technologies (INSPECT)10.1109/INSPECT63485.2024.10896155(1-6)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Proof of Location Verification towards Trustworthy Collaborative Multi-Vendor Robotic Systems2024 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT)10.1109/ICIT58233.2024.10540894(1-8)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Analysis and Research on Intelligent Logistics Data under Internet of Things and BlockchainApplied Artificial Intelligence10.1080/08839514.2024.241382438:1Online publication date: 9-Oct-2024
  • (2024)The convergence of Digital Twins and Distributed Ledger TechnologiesJournal of Network and Computer Applications10.1016/j.jnca.2024.103857225:COnline publication date: 1-May-2024
  • (2024)A review of residential blockchain internet of things energy systems: Resources, storage and challengesEnergy Reports10.1016/j.egyr.2023.12.06211(1225-1241)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media