Cited By
View all- Panhale TBryce DTsougkou E(2022)Augmented reality and experience co-creation in heritage settingsJournal of Marketing Management10.1080/0267257X.2022.212006139:5-6(470-497)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2022
Dealing with Clutter in Augmented Museum Environments
Article No.: 21, Pages 1 - 9
Abstract
Augmented Reality (AR) can be used in museum and exhibition spaces to extend the available information space. However, AR scenes in such settings can become cluttered when exhibits are displayed close to one another. To investigate this problem, we have implemented and evaluated four AR headset interaction techniques for the Microsoft HoloLens that are based on the idea of Focus+Context (F+C) visualisation [Kalkofen et al. 2007]. These four techniques were made up of all combinations of interaction and response dimensions where the interaction was triggered by either “walk” (approaching an exhibit) or “gaze” (scanning/looking at an exhibit) and the AR holograms responded dynamically in either a “scale” or “frame” representation. We measured the efficiency and accuracy of these four techniques in a user study that examined their performance in an abstracted exhibition setting when undertaking two different tasks (“seeking” and “counting”). The results of this study indicated that the “scale” representation was more effective at reducing clutter than the “frame” representation, and that there was a user preference for the “gaze-scale” technique.
References
[1]
[n.d.]. Bone Hall | Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. Retrieved Jul 11, 2019 from https://naturalhistory.si.edu/exhibits/bone-hall
[2]
[n.d.]. Mixed Reality Toolkit (MRTK). Retrieved Jul 16, 2019 from https://microsoft.github.io/MixedRealityToolkit-Unity/README.html
[3]
[n.d.]. Treatments and Blocks. Retrieved Jul 18, 2019 from https://www.statsdirect.com/help/Default.htm#analysis_of_variance/treatments_and_blocks.htm
[4]
Edouard Auvinet, Brook Galna, Arash Aframian, and Justin Cobb. 2017. O100: Validation of the precision of the Microsoft HoloLens augmented reality headset head and hand motion measurement. Gait & Posture 57(2017), 175 – 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.353 ESMAC 2017 Abstracts.
[5]
R. Azuma, Y. Baillot, R. Behringer, S. Feiner, S. Julier, and B. MacIntyre. 2001. Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21, 6 (Nov 2001), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459
[6]
Blaine Bell, Steven Feiner, and Tobias Höllerer. 2001. View Management for Virtual and Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/502348.502363
[7]
Stephen Bitgood. 2010. AN ATTENTION-VALUE MODEL OF MUSEUM VISITORS.
[8]
P. Bruce and A. Bruce. 2017. Practical Statistics for Data Scientists: 50 Essential Concepts. O’Reilly Media. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=JtPTDgAAQBAJ
[9]
Andy Cockburn, Amy Karlson, and Benjamin B. Bederson. 2009. A Review of Overview+Detail, Zooming, and Focus+Context Interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 41, 1, Article 2 (Jan. 2009), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1456650.1456652
[10]
S. Di Verdi, D. Nurmi, and T. Hollerer. 2003. ARWin - a desktop augmented reality Window Manager. In The Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2003. Proceedings.298–299. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2003.1240729
[11]
Neven A.M. ElSayed, Ross T. Smith, Kim Marriott, and Bruce H. Thomas. 2018. Context-aware design pattern for situated analytics: Blended Model View Controller. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 44 (2018), 1 – 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.11.001
[12]
R. Furlan. 2016. The future of augmented reality: Hololens - Microsoft’s AR headset shines despite rough edges [Resources_Tools and Toys]. IEEE Spectrum 53, 6 (June 2016), 21–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2016.7473143
[13]
Mariangely Iglesias Pena Anastacia MacAllister Eliot Winer Gabriel Evans, Jack Miller. 2017. Evaluating the Microsoft HoloLens through an augmented reality assembly application. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2262626
[14]
Eva Hornecker and Luigina Ciolfi. 2019. Human-Computer Interactions in Museums. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 12, 2(2019), i–171. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00901ED1V01Y201902HCI042 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.2200/S00901ED1V01Y201902HCI042
[15]
Jacek Jankowski and Martin Hachet. 2013. A Survey of Interaction Techniques for Interactive 3D Environments. In Eurographics 2013 - State of the Art Reports, M. Sbert and L. Szirmay-Kalos (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/conf/EG2013/stars/065-093
[16]
S. Julier, M. Lanzagorta, Y. Baillot, L. Rosenblum, S. Feiner, T. Hollerer, and S. Sestito. 2000. Information filtering for mobile augmented reality. In Proceedings IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality (ISAR 2000). 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISAR.2000.880917
[17]
D. Kalkofen, E. Mendez, and D. Schmalstieg. 2007. Interactive Focus and Context Visualization for Augmented Reality. In 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2007.4538846
[18]
Robert Kosara, Helwig Hauser, and Donna L. Gresh. 2003. An Interaction View on Information Visualization.
[19]
R. Kosara, S. Miksch, and H. Hauser. 2002. Focus+context taken literally. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 22, 1 (Jan 2002), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.974515
[20]
K. Makita, M. Kanbara, and N. Yokoya. 2009. View management of annotations for wearable augmented reality. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. 982–985. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2009.5202661
[21]
Isabel Pedersen, Nathan Gale, Pejman Mirza-Babaei, and Samantha Reid. 2017. More than meets the eye: The benefits of augmented reality and holographic displays for digital cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) 10, 2 (2017), 11.
[22]
John Peponis, Ruth Conroy Dalton, Jean Wineman, and Nick Dalton. 2004. Measuring the Effects of Layout upon Visitors’ Spatial Behaviors in Open Plan Exhibition Settings. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31, 3 (2004), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3041 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1068/b3041
[23]
Sophie Stellmach, Sebastian Stober, Andreas Nürnberger, and Raimund Dachselt. 2011. Designing Gaze-supported Multimodal Interactions for the Exploration of Large Image Collections. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Novel Gaze-Controlled Applications(NGCA ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1983302.1983303
[24]
Jean D. Wineman and John Peponis. 2010. Constructing Spatial Meaning: Spatial Affordances in Museum Design. Environment and Behavior 42, 1 (2010), 86–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509335534 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509335534
[25]
Massimo Zancanaro, Tsvi Kuflik, Zvi Boger, Dina Goren-Bar, and Dan Goldwasser. 2007. Analyzing Museum Visitors’ Behavior Patterns. In User Modeling 2007, Cristina Conati, Kathleen McCoy, and Georgios Paliouras(Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 238–246.
Index Terms
- Dealing with Clutter in Augmented Museum Environments
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
A Pilot Study Comparing User Interactions Between Augmented and Virtual Reality
Advances in Visual ComputingAbstractImmersive Analytics (IA) and consumer adoption of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) are both rapidly growing. When used in conjunction, stereoscopic IA environments can offer improved user understanding ...
Building Virtual and Augmented Reality museum exhibitions
Web3D '04: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on 3D Web technologyA system that allows museums to build and manage Virtual and Augmented Reality exhibitions based on 3D models of artifacts is presented. Dynamic content creation based on pre-designed visualization templates allows content designers to create virtual ...
Digilog book for temple bell tolling experience based on interactive augmented reality
We first present the concept of the Digilog Book, an augmented paper book that provides additional multimedia content stimulating readers' five senses using augmented reality (AR) technologies. We also develop a prototype to show the usefulness and ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2019
354 pages
ISBN:9781450370028
DOI:10.1145/3359997
- Conference Chairs:
- Joaquim Jorge,
- June Kim,
- Herman Van Eyken,
- Editor:
- Stephen N. Spencer,
- Program Chairs:
- Mashhuda Glencross,
- Kenny Mitchell,
- Takuji Narumi
Copyright © 2019 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 14 November 2019
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
VRCAI '19
Sponsor:
VRCAI '19: The 17th International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry
November 14 - 16, 2019
QLD, Brisbane, Australia
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 51 of 107 submissions, 48%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 256Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)20
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Panhale TBryce DTsougkou E(2022)Augmented reality and experience co-creation in heritage settingsJournal of Marketing Management10.1080/0267257X.2022.212006139:5-6(470-497)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2022
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format