skip to main content
10.1145/3359997.3365702acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conformal Redirected Walking for Shared Indoor Spaces

Published:14 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work we present a redirected walking scheme suitable for shared spaces in a virtual reality environment. We show our redirected walking to work for the case of two physical spaces (a host and a guest) being merged into a single virtual host space. The redirection is based on warping the guest space into the host space using a conformal mapping that preserves the local shape and features. We compare our technique with state-of-the art indoor redirection schemes and show its efficiency. We found our method to have better task performance, higher social presence, and less simulator sickness.

References

  1. Mahdi Azmandian, Timofey Grechkin, Mark Bolas, and Evan Suma. 2016. The redirected walking toolkit: a unified development platform for exploring large virtual environments. In 2016 IEEE 2nd Workshop on Everyday Virtual Reality (WEVR). IEEE, 9–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Mahdi Azmandian, Timofey Grechkin, and Evan Suma Rosenberg. 2017. An evaluation of strategies for two-user redirected walking in shared physical spaces. In 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). IEEE, 91–98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Frank Biocca, Chad Harms, and Judee K Burgoon. 2003. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators & virtual environments 12, 5(2003), 456–480.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Haiwei Chen, Samantha Chen, and Evan Suma Rosenberg. 2018. Redirected Walking Strategies in Irregularly Shaped and Dynamic Physical Environments. In 25th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR ‘18). Workshop on Everyday Virtual Reality.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yong-Hun Cho, Dong-Yong Lee, and In-Kwon Lee. 2018. Path Prediction Using LSTM Network for Redirected Walking. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 527–528.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben J Congdon, Tuanfeng Wang, and Anthony Steed. 2018. Merging environments for shared spaces in mixed reality. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Zhi-Chao Dong, Xiao-Ming Fu, Chi Zhang, Kang Wu, and Ligang Liu. 2017. Smooth assembled mappings for large-scale real walking. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 36, 6 (2017), 211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Eike Langbehn, Paul Lubos, Gerd Bruder, and Frank Steinicke. 2017. Application of redirected walking in room-scale VR. In Virtual Reality (VR), 2017 IEEE. IEEE, 449–450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Anh Nguyen and Andreas Kunz. 2018. Discrete scene rotation during blinks and its effect on redirected walking algorithms. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, 29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Niels Christian Nilsson, Tabitha Peck, Gerd Bruder, Eri Hodgson, Stefania Serafin, Mary Whitton, Frank Steinicke, and Evan Suma Rosenberg. 2018. 15 Years of Research on Redirected Walking in Immersive Virtual Environments. IEEE computer graphics and applications 38, 2 (2018), 44–56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sharif Razzaque. 2005. Redirected Walking. Ph.D. Dissertation. Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Advisor(s) Brooks,Jr., Fredrick P.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sharif Razzaque, Zachariah Kohn, and Mary C. Whitton. 2001. Redirected Walking. In Eurographics 2001 - Short Presentations. Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/egs.20011036Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Aviv Segall and Mirela Ben-Chen. 2016. Iterative closest conformal maps between planar domains. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 35. Wiley Online Library, 33–40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mel Slater, Martin Usoh, and Anthony Steed. 1994. Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 3, 2(1994), 130–144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Qi Sun, Anjul Patney, Li-Yi Wei, Omer Shapira, Jingwan Lu, Paul Asente, Suwen Zhu, Morgan McGuire, David Luebke, and Arie Kaufman. 2018. Towards virtual reality infinite walking: dynamic saccadic redirection. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 37, 4 (2018), 67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Qi Sun, Li-Yi Wei, and Arie Kaufman. 2016. Mapping virtual and physical reality. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 35, 4 (2016), 64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Shinji Umeyama. 1991. Least-squares estimation of transformation parameters between two point patterns. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 13, 4(1991), 376–380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Khrystyna Vasylevska and Hannes Kaufmann. 2017. Compressing VR: Fitting large virtual environments within limited physical space. IEEE computer graphics and applications 37, 5 (2017), 85–91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Markus Zank, Colin Yao, and Andreas Kunz. 2017. Multi-phase wall warner system for real walking in virtual environments. In 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, 223–224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    VRCAI '19: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry
    November 2019
    354 pages
    ISBN:9781450370028
    DOI:10.1145/3359997

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 November 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate51of107submissions,48%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGGRAPH '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format