skip to main content
10.1145/3361721.3362118acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswipsceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Exploring Spatial Skills and Computing in Primary and Secondary Education

Published:23 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This workshop aims to break down the connection between spatial skills and STEM - particularly computing - and highlight existing research of value, presenting an argument for spatial skills instruction in schools. We will discuss known challenges and obstacles to delivery, and aim to collect further challenges from participants. We will then consider effective means of developing spatial skills, and measuring potential outcomes (particularly in computing science), that could be generally applied across multiple schools concurrently with limited training and resource costs. The resulting pack should be a theoretical solution which could potentially be practically implemented across multiple schools.

References

  1. Sedanur Cakmak, Mine Isiksal, and Yusuf Koc. 2014. Investigating effect of origami-based instruction on elementary students' spatial skills and perceptions. The Journal of Educational Research 107, 1 (2014), 59--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. John B Carroll. 1993. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Carolyn S Carter, Mary A Larussa, and George M Bodner. 1987. A study of two measures of spatial ability as predictors of success in different levels of general chemistry. Journal of research in science teaching 24, 7 (1987), 645--657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Beth Casey, Sumru Erkut, Ineke Ceder, and Jessica Mercer Young. 2008. Use of a storytelling context to improve girls' and boys' geometry skills in kindergarten. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29, 1 (2008), 29--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Beth M Casey, Nicole Andrews, Holly Schindler, Joanne E Kersh, Alexandra Samper, and Juanita Copley. 2008. The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction 26, 3 (2008), 269--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Yi-Ling Cheng and Kelly S Mix. 2014. Spatial training improves children's mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development 15, 1 (2014), 2--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Stephen Cooper, Karen Wang, Maya Israni, and Sheryl Sorby. 2015. Spatial skills training in introductory computing. In Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research. ACM, 13--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Brent Davis, Spatial Reasoning Study Group, et al. 2015. Spatial reasoning in the early years: Principles, assertions, and speculations. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Elizabeth Fennema and Julia Sherman. 1977. Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American educational research journal 14, 1 (1977), 51--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. David W Grissmer, Andrew J Mashburn, Elizabeth Cottone, Wei-Bing Chen, Laura L Brock, William M Murrah, Julia Blodgett, and Claire Cameron. 2013. Play-Based After-School Curriculum Improves Measures of Executive Function, Visuospatial and Math Skills and Classroom Behavior for High Risk K--1 Children. In Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chun-Heng Ho, Charles Eastman, and Richard Catrambone. 2006. An investigation of 2D and 3D spatial and mathematical abilities. Design Studies 27, 4 (2006), 505--524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sue Jones and Gary Burnett. 2008. Spatial ability and learning to program. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sue Jane Jones and Gary E Burnett. 2007. Spatial skills and navigation of source code. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39, 3 (2007), 231--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Maria Kozhevnikov, Michael A Motes, and Mary Hegarty. 2007. Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science 31, 4 (2007), 549--579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Joan Moss, Zachary Hawes, Sarah Naqvi, and Beverly Caswell. 2015. Adapting Japanese Lesson Study to enhance the teaching and learning of geometry and spatial reasoning in early years classrooms: a case study. ZDM 47, 3 (2015), 377--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Nora S Newcombe. 2010. Picture this: Increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator 34, 2 (2010), 29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nora S. Newcombe, Julie L. Booth, and Elizabeth A. Gunderson. 2019. Spatial Skills, Reasoning, and Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 100--123. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235631.006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. George J Pallrand and Fred Seeber. 1984. Spatial ability and achievement in introductory physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 21, 5 (1984), 507--516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jack Parkinson and Quintin Cutts. 2018. Investigating the Relationship Between Spatial Skills and Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. ACM, 106--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jeffrey R Pribyl and George M Bodner. 1987. Spatial ability and its role in organic chemistry: A study of four organic courses. Journal of research in science teaching 24, 3 (1987), 229--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Julia Sherman. 1981. Girls' and boys' enrollments in theoretical math courses: A longitudinal study. Psychology of Women Quarterly 5 (1981), 681--689.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sheryl Sorby, Norma Veurink, and Scott Streiner. 2018. Does spatial skills instruction improve STEM outcomes? The answer is âĂŸyesâĂŹ. Learning and Individual Differences 67 (1 10 2018), 209--222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.09.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheryl A Sorby. 1999. Developing 3-D spatial visualization skills. Engineering Design Graphics Journal 63, 2 (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sheryl A Sorby. 2007. Developing 3D spatial skills for engineering students. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 13, 1 (2007), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Sheryl A Sorby and Beverly J Baartmans. 1996. A Course for the Development of 3-D Spatial Visualization Skills. Engineering Design Graphics Journal 60, 1 (1996), 13--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Donald E Super and Paul B Bachrach. 1957. Scientific careers and vocational development theory: A review, a critique and some recommendations. (1957).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindsay Anne Tartre. 1990. Spatial orientation skill and mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (1990), 216--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. L A Tartre. 1990. Spatial skills, gender and mathematics. In Mathematics and Gender, E Fennema and G Leder (Eds.). Teacher's College Press, New York, Chapter 3, 27--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Holly A Taylor and Allyson Hutton. 2013. Think3d!: Training spatial thinking fundamental to STEM education. Cognition and Instruction 31, 4 (2013), 434--455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. David Tzuriel and Gila Egozi. 2010. Gender differences in spatial ability of young children: The effects of training and processing strategies. Child development 81, 5 (2010), 1417--1430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. David H Uttal, Nathaniel G Meadow, Elizabeth Tipton, Linda L Hand, Alison R Alden, Christopher Warren, and Nora S Newcombe. 2013. The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Norma L Veurink and Sheryl A Sorby. 2011. Raising the bar? Longitudinal study to determine which students would most benefit from spatial training. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jonathan Wai, David Lubinski, and Camilla P Benbow. 2009. Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology 101, 4 (2009), 817.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Lisa Marie Weckbacher and Yukari Okamoto. 2014. Mental rotation ability in relation to self-perceptions of high school geometry. Learning and Individual Differences 30 (2014), 58--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Spatial Skills and Computing in Primary and Secondary Education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WiPSCE '19: Proceedings of the 14th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education
      October 2019
      127 pages
      ISBN:9781450377041
      DOI:10.1145/3361721

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • tutorial
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      WiPSCE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate23of43submissions,53%Overall Acceptance Rate104of279submissions,37%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader