skip to main content
10.1145/3362789.3362839acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Making Teaching and Learning Visible: How Can Learning Designs Be Represented?

Published: 16 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

This work is situated in the context of the Learning Design research area. It reviews different forms in which learning designs can be represented both in textual or in a graphical way. The different forms have been gathered from the options used by teachers in current practice and from proposals of the research community. The following categories have been defined to classify the several representation types into a clear and concise classification: Narrative Text; Forms/Templates; Table Representations/Matrices; Concept Maps, Mind Maps and Tree-based Representations; Flow Diagrams; Sequential Diagrams; and Ad-hoc Diagrams. For each type of representation specific examples and uses are provided, showing the benefits and contexts in which they are used. Text-based representations are common in the real teachers' practice, while graphical representations have been taken from research initiatives. The goal of the paper is to attract attention to the fact that no type of representation for learning designs has been adopted as a mainstream, yet. A common language in this domain would be desirable and could offer great benefits related to the communication and sharing of teaching and learning results. This could be very useful for the representation of learning designs and teaching practices in learning analytics dashboards.

References

[1]
J. H. Larkin and H. A. Simon. 1987. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive science 11, 1 (1987), 65--100.
[2]
M. Scaife and Y. Rogers. 1996. External cognition: how do graphical representations work?. International journal of human-computer studies 45, 2 (1996), 185--213.
[3]
M. Montessori. 2013. The montessori method. Transaction publishers.
[4]
D. Bernstein, A.N. Burnett, A. M. Goodburn, and P. Savory. 2006. Making teaching and learning visible: Course portfolios and the peer review of teaching.
[5]
G. Conole. 2012. Designing for learning in an open world (Vol. 4). Springer Science & Business Media.
[6]
E. Dobozy and J. Dalziel. 2016. Transdisciplinary pedagogical templates and their potential for adaptive reuse. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 1, (2016).
[7]
J. Dalziel, G. Conole, S. Wills, S. Walker, S. Bennett, E. Dobozy, ... and M. Bower. 2013. The larnaca declaration on learning design--2013.
[8]
R. Koper, and B. Olivier. 2004. Representing the learning design of units of learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 7, 3 (2004).
[9]
I. Martínez-Ortiz, P. Moreno-Ger, J. L., Sierra and B. Fernández-Manjón. 2007. Supporting the Authoring and Operationalization of Educational Modelling Languages. J. UCS 13, 7 (2007), 938--947.
[10]
P. Sobreira and P. Tchounikine. 2015. Table-based representations can be used to offer easy-to-use, flexible, and adaptable learning scenario editors. Computers & Education 80 (2015) 15--27.
[11]
I. Falconer, H. Beetham, R. Oliver, L. Lockyer, and A. Littlejohn. 2007. Mod4L final report: Representing learning designs. Final report for the JISC-funded MOD4L project, Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University.
[12]
G. Conole and S. Wills. 2013. Representing learning designs--making design explicit and shareable. Educational Media International 50, 1 (2013) 24--38
[13]
D. Sampson, P. Zervas, and S. Sotirion. 2011. COSMOS: A web-based repository of learning designs for science educators. Advanced Science Letters 4 (2011) 11--12
[14]
G. Conole and K. Fill. 2005. A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (Advances in Learning Design. Special Issue, eds. Colin Tattersall, Rob Koper) (2005).
[15]
L. Botturi, L. 2006. E 2 ML: A visual language for the design of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 54, 3 (2006) 265--293.
[16]
R. Oliver and A. Littlejohn. 2006. Discovering and describing accessible and reusable practitioner-focused learning. In Proceedings of Theme of the JISC Online Conference: Innovating e-Learning, 30--33.
[17]
L.A. Atkinson. 2015. Exploring the Impact of an Urban Teacher Education Program on Teachers' Professional Practices. Arizona State University.
[18]
K. M. Edmondson. 1995. Concept mapping for the development of medical curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32, 7 (1995) 777--793.
[19]
J. D. Novak and A. J. Cañas. 2008. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them.
[20]
G. Paquette, M. Léonard, K. Lundgren-Cayrol, S. Mihaila, and D. Gareau. 2006. Learning design based on graphical knowledge-modelling. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 9, 1 (2006).
[21]
G. Paquette, C. Aubin and F. Crevier. 1999. MISA, A Knowledge-based Method for the Engineering of Learning Systems. Journal of Courseware Engineering 2 (1999) 63--78.
[22]
J. Dalziel. 2003. Implementing learning design: the Learning Activity Management System (LAMS). 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), Adelaide, Australia
[23]
C. M. Reigeluth. 1999. The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory 2 (1999) 425--453.
[24]
S. Agostinho, B. Harper, R.Oliver, J. Hedberg, and S. Wills. 2008. A visual learning design representation to facilitate dissemination and reuse of innovative pedagogical strategies in university teaching. In Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: Theories and practices, 380--393. IGI Global.
[25]
J. Jones, S. Bennett and L. Lockyer. 2011. Applying a Learning Design to the Design of a University Unit: A Single Case Study. Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (EDMEDIA), 3340--3349.
[26]
A. Brasher, G. Conole, S. Cross, M. Weller, P. Clark and J. White. 2008. CompendiumLD-a tool for effective, efficient and creative learning design.
[27]
D. Hernández Leo, J. I. Asensio-Pérez, Y. Dimitriadis, and E. D. Villasclaras-Fernández. 2010. Generating CSCL scripts: From a conceptual model of pattern languages to the design of real scripts. Goodyear P, Retalis S, (eds.) Technology-enhaced learning: design patterns and pattern languages. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers (2010). p. 49--64, appendix.
[28]
M. Derntl, S. Neumann and P. Oberhuemer. 2011. Propelling standards-based sharing and reuse in instructional modeling communities: The open graphical learning modeler (OpenGLM). In 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), (2011) 431--435, IEEE.
[29]
A. Weinberger, I. Kollar, Y. Dimitriadis, K. Mäkitalo-Siegl, and F. Fischer. 2009. Computer-supported collaboration scripts: Theory and practice of scripting CSCL. Perspectives of educational psychology and computer science. Technology-Enhanced Learning. Principles and Products, 155--173.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)In Search of Alignment between Learning Analytics and Learning Design: A Multiple Case Study in a Higher Education InstitutionEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1311111413:11(1114)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
  • (2021)Using BPMN to Identify Indicators for Teacher Intervention in Support of Self-regulation and Co-regulation of Learning in Asynchronous e-learningTechnology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education10.1007/978-3-030-73988-1_16(210-222)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2021
  • (2019)Learning AnalyticsProceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1145/3362789.3362943(248-252)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2019

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
TEEM'19: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
October 2019
1085 pages
ISBN:9781450371919
DOI:10.1145/3362789
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

In-Cooperation

  • University of Salamanca: University of Salamanca

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 October 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Representation types
  2. diagrams
  3. learning design
  4. making teaching and learning visible

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

TEEM'19

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)In Search of Alignment between Learning Analytics and Learning Design: A Multiple Case Study in a Higher Education InstitutionEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1311111413:11(1114)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
  • (2021)Using BPMN to Identify Indicators for Teacher Intervention in Support of Self-regulation and Co-regulation of Learning in Asynchronous e-learningTechnology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education10.1007/978-3-030-73988-1_16(210-222)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2021
  • (2019)Learning AnalyticsProceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1145/3362789.3362943(248-252)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2019

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media