skip to main content
10.1145/3363384.3363480acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshttfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Public Outcomes of Publicly Funded Socio-Technical Projects

Published: 19 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

In this short essay, we present our reflections on public outcomes of publicly funded socio-technical projects in relevance to discussions on empowerment, participation, and researcher responsibility in the field of Human Computer Interaction (HCI). Our work offers a reflective analysis and raises critical questions for further communal discussion about the life of research projects when the funding ends. When a publicly funded research project for empowering users comes to an end, how do we as HCI researchers measure the social impact of our interventions? What are the public outcomes and what are our responsibilities after we leave the field? To address these questions, first, we introduce two publicly funded socio-technical projects, situate our work with respect to current discourse on empowering users in HCI, present findings and insights based on our analysis of the projects, and conclude with a set of questions that are intended to further communal discussion.

References

[1]
Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1301–1310. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521
[2]
Susanne Bødker. 2006. When Second Wave HCI Meets Third Wave Challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Changing Roles(NordiCHI ’06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476
[3]
Sarah Fox, Jill Dimond, Lilly Irani, Tad Hirsch, Michael Muller, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Social Justice and Design: Power and Oppression in Collaborative Systems. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW ’17 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022201
[4]
Andrea Fumagalli, Sandro Gobetti, Cristina Morini, and Rachele Serino. 2017. PIE News - Sustainability and Commonfare Report. Deliverable D5.4 produced for the PIE News project (2017). https://zenodo.org/record/3332718/files/PIE_D5.4_FIN.pdf
[5]
Gillian R. Hayes. 2011. The Relationship of Action Research to Human-computer Interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 3, Article 15 (Aug. 2011), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993060.1993065
[6]
Raji Hunjan and Jethro Pettit. 2011. Power: A practical guide for facilitating social change. Carnegie United Kingdom Trust Dunfermline.
[7]
Gopinaath Kannabiran and Marianne Graves Petersen. 2010. Politics at the Interface: A Foucauldian Power Analysis. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries(NordiCHI ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 695–698. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1869007
[8]
Peter Lyle, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, and Maurizio Teli. 2018. Fostering Commonfare. Infrastructuring Autonomous Social Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 452, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174026
[9]
Yvonne Rogers. 2006. Moving on from Weiser’s Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging UbiComp Experiences. In UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing, Paul Dourishand Adrian Friday (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 404–421.
[10]
Hanna Schneider, Malin Eiband, Daniel Ullrich, and Andreas Butz. 2018. Empowerment in HCI - A Survey and Framework. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 244, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173818
[11]
Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Peter Lyle, and Maurizio Teli. 2018. Fostering Commonfare. Entanglements between Participatory Design and Feminism. In Design Research Society 2018: Catalyst. 458–471. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.557
[12]
Geeta Shroff and Matthew Kam. 2011. Towards a Design Model for Women’s Empowerment in the Developing World. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2867–2876. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979368

Index Terms

  1. Public Outcomes of Publicly Funded Socio-Technical Projects
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      HttF '19: Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019
      November 2019
      260 pages
      ISBN:9781450372039
      DOI:10.1145/3363384
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 19 November 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. empowerment
      2. power
      3. researcher responsibility

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      HTTF 2019
      HTTF 2019: Halfway to the Future
      November 19 - 20, 2019
      Nottingham, United Kingdom

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 59
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media