skip to main content
10.1145/3366424.3383301acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dynamic Network Modeling from Motif-Activity

Published:20 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Graph structure in dynamic networks changes rapidly. Using temporal information about their connections, models for dynamic networks can be developed and used to understand the process of how their structure changes over time. Additionally, higher-order motifs have been established as building blocks for the structure of networks. In this paper, we first demonstrate empirically in three dynamic network datasets, that motifs with edges: (1) do not transition from one motif type to another (e.g, wedges becoming triangles and vice-versa); (2) motifs re-appear in other time periods and the rate depends on their configuration. We propose the Dynamic Motif-Activity Model (DMA) for sampling synthetic dynamic graphs with parameters learned from an observed network. We evaluate our DMA model, with two dynamic graph generative model baselines, by measuring different graph structure metrics in the generated synthetic graphs and comparing with the graph used as input. Our results show that employing motifs captures the underlying graph structure and modeling their activity recreates the fast changes seen in dynamic networks.

References

  1. Austin R. Benson, Rediet Abebe, Michael T. Schaub, Ali Jadbabaie, and Jon Kleinberg. 2018. Simplicial closure and higher-order link prediction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, 48 (2018), E11221–E11230. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800683115 arxiv:1802.06916Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Fan Chung and Linyuan Lu. 2002. The average distances in random graphs with given expected degrees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 25 (2002), 15879–15882. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.252631999Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P Erdös and a Rényi. 1959. On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae 6 (1959), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/1999405 arxiv:1205.2923Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Petter Holme. 2013. Epidemiologically Optimal Static Networks from Temporal Network Data. PLoS Computational Biology 9, 7 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003142Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Petter Holme. 2015. Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium. European Physical Journal B 88, 9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2015-60657-4 arxiv:1508.01303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Yuriy Hulovatyy, Huili Chen, and T Milenković. 2015. Exploring the structure and function of temporal networks with dynamic graphlets. Bioinformatics 31, 12 (2015), i171–i180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Brian Karrer and M. E. J. Newman. 2009. Random graph models for directed acyclic networks. Physical Review E (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.046110 arxiv:0907.4346Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryan Klimt and Yiming Yang. 2004. The enron corpus: A new dataset for email classification research. In European Conference on Machine Learning. Springer, 217–226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jérôme Kunegis. 2013. KONECT - The koblenz network collection. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (2013), 1343–1350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Timothy La Fond, Dan Roberts, Jennifer Neville, James Tyler, and Stacey Connaughton. 2012. The impact of communication structure and interpersonal dependencies on distributed teams. (2012), 558–565.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Guillaume Laurent, Jari Saramäki, and Márton Karsai. 2015. From calls to communities: a model for time-varying social networks. European Physical Journal B 88, 11 (2015), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2015-60481-x arxiv:1506.00393Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jure Leskovec, D Chakrabarti, J Kleinberg, C Faloutsos, and Zoubin Ghahramani. 2010. Kronecker graphs: An approach to modeling networks. Journal of Machine Learning Research 11 (2010), 985–1042. https://doi.org/10.1145/1756006.1756039 arxiv:0812.4905Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jure Leskovec, Jon Kleinberg, and Christos Faloutsos. 2007. Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) 1, 1(2007), 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lun Li, David Alderson, John C Doyle, and Walter Willinger. 2006. Towards a Theory of Scale-Free Graphs : Definition , Properties , and Implications. 2 (2006), 431–523.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Milo, S. Shen-Orr, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, D. Chklovskii, and U. Alon. 2002. Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298, 5594 (2002), 824–827. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5594.824Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Antoine Moinet, Michele Starnini, and Romualdo Pastor-Satorras. 2015. Burstiness and Aging in Social Temporal Networks. Physical Review Letters 114, 10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.108701 arxiv:1412.0587Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sebastian Moreno and Jennifer Neville. 2009. An Investigation of the Distributional Characteristics of Generative Graph Models. Win (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sebastian Moreno, Jennifer Neville, and Sergey Kirshner. 2018. Tied kronecker product graph models to capture variance in network populations. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 12, 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3161885Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Krzysztof Nowicki and Tom a. B Snijders. 2001. Estimation and Prediction for Stochastic Blockstructures. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96, 455 (2001), 1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214501753208735Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ashwin Paranjape, Austin R Benson, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Motifs in temporal networks. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 601–610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. N. Perra, B. Gonçalves, R. Pastor-Satorras, and A. Vespignani. 2012. Activity driven modeling of time varying networks. Scientific Reports 2(2012), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00469 arxiv:1203.5351Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Julia Preusse, Jérôme Kunegis, Matthias Thimm, Steffen Staab, and Thomas Gottron. 2013. Structural Dynamics of Knowledge Networks.ICWSM 17(2013), 18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sumit Purohit, Lawrence B Holder, and George Chin. 2018. Temporal Graph Generation Based on a Distribution of Temporal Motifs. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Mining and Learning with Graphs (2018), 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Luis E.C. Rocha and Vincent D. Blondel. 2013. Bursts of Vertex Activation and Epidemics in Evolving Networks. PLoS Computational Biology 9, 3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002974Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Albert Sunny, Bhushan Kotnis, and Joy Kuri. 2015. Dynamics of history-dependent epidemics in temporal networks. Physical Review E 92, 2 (2015), 022811.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Christian L. Vestergaard, Mathieu Génois, and Alain Barrat. 2014. How memory generates heterogeneous dynamics in temporal networks. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 90, 4(2014), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.042805 arxiv:1409.1805Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Stanley Wasserman and Philippa Pattison. 1996. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to markov graphs and p. Psychometrika 61, 3 (1996), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294547Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ömer Nebil Yaveroğlu, Noël Malod-Dognin, Darren Davis, Zoran Levnajic, Vuk Janjic, Rasa Karapandza, Aleksandar Stojmirovic, and Nataša Pržulj. 2014. Revealing the hidden Language of complex networks. Scientific Reports 4(2014), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04547Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Xin Zhang, Shuai Shao, H Eugene Stanley, and Shlomo Havlin. 2014. Dynamic motifs in socio-economic networks. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 108, 5 (2014), 58001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Qiankun Zhao, Yuan Tian, Qi He, Nuria Oliver, Ruoming Jin, and Wang Chien Lee. 2010. Communication motifs: A tool to characterize social communications. International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings (2010), 1645–1648. https://doi.org/10.1145/1871437.1871694Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Dynamic Network Modeling from Motif-Activity
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WWW '20: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020
          April 2020
          854 pages
          ISBN:9781450370240
          DOI:10.1145/3366424

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 April 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format