skip to main content
10.1145/3366424.3383564acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Biases on Social Media Data: (Keynote Extended Abstract)

Published: 20 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Social media data is often used to pulse the opinion of online communities, either by predicting sentiment or stances (e.g., political), to mention just two typical use cases. However, those analysis assume that the data samples really represent the underlying demographics of the overall community, both, in number and characteristics, which in most cases is not true. As a result, extrapolating these results to larger populations usually do not work. This happens because social media data is inherently biased, mainly due to two facts: (1) not all people is equally active in social media platforms and most of them are really passive; and (2) there are demographic biases in gender and age, among other attributes. Hence, the questions of how representative is the data and if is possible to make it representative are of crucial importance. We also discuss related issues such as using public samples of mostly private platforms as well as typical errors in the analysis of such data.

References

[1]
[1] Ricardo Baeza-Yates and Diego Saez-Trumper. 2015. Wisdom of the Crowd or Wisdom of a Few? An Analysis of Users’ Content Generation. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media (HT ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 69–74.
[2]
[2] Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2018. Bias on the Web. Communications of ACM 61, 6 (June 2018), 54–61.
[3]
[3] Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2020. The Amazing Errors of Alto Analytics’ Analysis of Chilean Social Networks (in Spanish). Medium, https://medium.com/@rbaeza_yates/los-asombrosos-errores-del-2b0225c2e622.
[4]
[4] Eduardo Graells-Garrido, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, and Mounia Lalmas. 2019. How Representative is an Abortion Debate on Twitter? In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science (WebSci ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 133–134.
[5]
[5] Jakob Nielsen. 2006. The 90-9-1 Rule for Participation Inequality in Social Media and Online Communities. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/.
[6]
[6] Jia Tolentino. 2019. Trick Mirror: Reflections on Self-Delusion. Random House, NY, USA.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Employing Hybrid AI Systems to Trace and Document Bias in ML PipelinesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.342738812(96821-96847)Online publication date: 2024

Index Terms

  1. Biases on Social Media Data: (Keynote Extended Abstract)
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WWW '20: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020
      April 2020
      854 pages
      ISBN:9781450370240
      DOI:10.1145/3366424
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 20 April 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Bias
      2. data samples
      3. gender and age prediction.
      4. representativeness

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      WWW '20
      Sponsor:
      WWW '20: The Web Conference 2020
      April 20 - 24, 2020
      Taipei, Taiwan

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Employing Hybrid AI Systems to Trace and Document Bias in ML PipelinesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.342738812(96821-96847)Online publication date: 2024

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media