research-article

Designing Social Machines for Tackling Online Disinformation

Authors:

Andrei Ciortea,

Simon MayerAuthors Info & Claims

WWW '20: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020

Pages 650 - 654

https://doi.org/10.1145/3366424.3385770

Published: 20 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Traditional news outlets as carriers and distributors of information have been challenged by online social networks with regards to their gate-keeping function. We believe that only a combined effort of people and machines will be able to curb so-called “fake news” at scale in a decentralized Web. In this position paper, we propose an approach to design social machines that coordinate human- and machine-driven credibility assessment of information on a decentralized Web. To this end, we defined a fact-checking process that draws upon ongoing efforts for tackling disinformation on the Web, and we formalized this process as a multi-agent organisation for curating W3C Web Annotations. We present the current state of our prototypical implementation in the form of a browser plugin that builds on the Hypothesis annotation platform and the JaCaMo multi-agent platform. Our social machines would span across the Web to enable collaboration in form of public discourse, thereby increasing the transparency and accountability of information.

References

[1]

Alexandre Alaphilippe, Alexis Gizikis, 2019. Automated tackling of disinformation. Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (2019).

[2]

Tim Berners-Lee and Mark Fischetti. 2001. Weaving the Web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the WWW by its inventor. DIANE Publishing Company.

[3]

Alessandro Bessi, Mauro Coletto, George Davidescu, 2015. Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PloS one 10, 2 (2015), e0118093.

[4]

Olivier Boissier, Rafael Bordini, 2013. Multi-agent oriented programming with JaCaMo. Science of Computer Programming 78, 6 (2013), 747–761.

Digital Library

[5]

Amit Chopra and Munindar Singh. 2016. From social machines to social protocols: Software engineering foundations for sociotechnical systems. In Proc. of the 25th Int. Conf. on WWW. Int. WWW Conferences Steering Committee, 903–914.

Digital Library

[6]

Miriam Fernandez and Harith Alani. 2018. Online misinformation: Challenges and future directions. In Comp. Proc. of TWC2018. 595–602.

Digital Library

[7]

Simson L Garfinkel. 2008. Wikipedia and the Meaning of Truth. Technology Review 111, 6 (2008), 84–86.

[8]

Lucas Graves. 2018. Understanding the promise and limits of automated fact-checking. Reuters Institute, University of Oxford 2 (2018).

[9]

Jim Hendler and Tim Berners-Lee. 2010. From the Semantic Web to social machines: A research challenge for AI on the WWW. Artificial Intelligence 174, 2 (2010), 156–161.

Digital Library

[10]

Jomi Hübner, Jaime Sichman, and Olivier Boissier. 2007. Developing organised MAS using the MOISE+ model: programming issues at the system and agent levels. Int. J. of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering 1, 3-4(2007), 370–395.

Digital Library

[11]

Nicholas Jennings and Michael Wooldridge. 1998. Applications of Intelligent Agents. In Agent Technology: Foundations, Applications, and Markets, Nicholas Jennings and Michael Wooldridge (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3–28.

[12]

Miriam Metzger, Andrew Flanagin, Keren Eyal, 2003. Credibility for the 21st Century. Annals of the Int. Communication Assoc. 27, 1 (2003), 293–335.

[13]

Dave Murray-Rust, Ognjen Scekic, 2014. A collaboration model for community-based software development with social machines. 10th IEEE Int. Conf. on Collaborative Computing (2014), 84–93.

[14]

Petros Papapanagiotou, Alan Davoust, Dave Murray-Rust, 2018. Social Machines for All. In Proc. of the 17th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and MAS (Stockholm, Sweden) (AAMAS ’18). Int. Foundation for Autonomous Agents and MAS, 1208–1212.

[15]

Georg Rehm, Julian Moreno-Schneider, and Peter Bourgonje. 2018. Automatic and Manual Web Annotations in an Infrastructure to handle Fake News and other Online Media Phenomena. Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation.

[16]

Robert Sanderson. 2017. Web Annotation Protocol. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-protocol/

[17]

Robert Sanderson, Paolo Ciccarese, and Benjamin Young. 2017. Web Annotation Vocabulary. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-vocab/

[18]

Jennifer Skeem and Christopher Lowenkamp. 2016. Risk, Race, and Recidivism: Predictive Bias And Disparate Impact. Criminology 54, 4 (2016), 680–712.

[19]

Paul Smart and Nigel Shadbolt. 2015. Social machines. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition. IGI Global, 6855–6862.

[20]

James Thorne and Andreas Vlachos. 2018. Automated fact checking: Task formulations, methods and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.07687(2018).

[21]

Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359, 6380 (2018), 1146–1151.

[22]

Byron C Wallace. 2015. Computational irony: A survey and new perspectives. Artificial Intelligence Review 43, 4 (2015), 467–483.

Digital Library

[23]

Gerhard Weiss. 2000. MAS: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. MIT press.

[24]

Alexandra-Madalina Zarafin, Antoine Zimmermann, and Olivier Boissier. 2012. Integrating Semantic Web Technologies and MAS: A Semantic Description of Multi-Agent Organizations. In Proc. of the First Int. Conf. on Agreement Technologies(CEUR WS), Vol. 918. 296–297.

[25]

Amy Zhang, Martin Robbins, Ed Bice, 2018. A Structured Response to Misinformation. In Comp. of The Web Conf. 2018. ACM Press.

Digital Library

Cited By

Kavtaradze L(2025)Dominant Disciplinary and Thematic Approaches to Automated Fact-Checking: A Scoping Review and ReflectionDigital Journalism10.1080/21670811.2024.2427036(1-26)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2427036
Flores-Saviaga CFeng SSavage S(2022)Datavoidant: An AI System for Addressing Political Data Voids on Social MediaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556166:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555616
Mayer SFuchs KBrügger DLian JCiortea A(2021)Improving customer decisions in web-based e-commerce through guerrilla moddingNature Machine Intelligence10.1038/s42256-021-00424-w3:12(1008-1010)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2021
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00424-w
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Designing Social Machines for Tackling Online Disinformation

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Disinformation Warfare: Understanding State-Sponsored Trolls on Twitter and Their Influence on the Web
WWW '19: Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference

Over the past couple of years, anecdotal evidence has emerged linking coordinated campaigns by state-sponsored actors with efforts to manipulate public opinion on the Web, often around major political events, through dedicated accounts, or “trolls.” ...
Fake News, Disinformation, Propaganda, and Media Bias
CIKM '21: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management

The rise of Internet and social media changed not only how we consume information, but it also democratized the process of content creation and dissemination, thus making it easily available to anybody. Despite the hugely positive impact, this situation ...
Interactions with Potential Mis/Disinformation URLs Among U.S. Users on Facebook, 2017-2019
FOCI '21: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2021 Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet

Misinformation and disinformation online---and on social media in particular--- have become a topic of widespread concern. Recently, Facebook and Social Science One released a large, unique, privacy-preserving dataset to researchers that contains data on ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

WWW '20: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020

April 2020

854 pages

ISBN:9781450370240

DOI:10.1145/3366424

Editors:
Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni
Sorbonne University, France
,
Gita Sukthankar
University of Central Florida, United States
,
Tie-Yan Liu
Microsoft Research Asia, China
,
Maarten van Steen
University of Twente, Netherlands

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 April 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

WWW '20

Sponsor:

SIGWEB

WWW '20: The Web Conference 2020

April 20 - 24, 2020

Taipei, Taiwan

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
289
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)24
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Kavtaradze L(2025)Dominant Disciplinary and Thematic Approaches to Automated Fact-Checking: A Scoping Review and ReflectionDigital Journalism10.1080/21670811.2024.2427036(1-26)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2427036
Flores-Saviaga CFeng SSavage S(2022)Datavoidant: An AI System for Addressing Political Data Voids on Social MediaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556166:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555616
Mayer SFuchs KBrügger DLian JCiortea A(2021)Improving customer decisions in web-based e-commerce through guerrilla moddingNature Machine Intelligence10.1038/s42256-021-00424-w3:12(1008-1010)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2021
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00424-w
Garcia KMayer SRicci ACiortea A(2020)Proactive Digital Companions in Pervasive Hypermedia Environments2020 IEEE 6th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC)10.1109/CIC50333.2020.00017(54-59)Online publication date: Dec-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC50333.2020.00017

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten