skip to main content
10.1145/3366424.3385770acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing Social Machines for Tackling Online Disinformation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Traditional news outlets as carriers and distributors of information have been challenged by online social networks with regards to their gate-keeping function. We believe that only a combined effort of people and machines will be able to curb so-called “fake news” at scale in a decentralized Web. In this position paper, we propose an approach to design social machines that coordinate human- and machine-driven credibility assessment of information on a decentralized Web. To this end, we defined a fact-checking process that draws upon ongoing efforts for tackling disinformation on the Web, and we formalized this process as a multi-agent organisation for curating W3C Web Annotations. We present the current state of our prototypical implementation in the form of a browser plugin that builds on the Hypothesis annotation platform and the JaCaMo multi-agent platform. Our social machines would span across the Web to enable collaboration in form of public discourse, thereby increasing the transparency and accountability of information.

References

  1. Alexandre Alaphilippe, Alexis Gizikis, 2019. Automated tackling of disinformation. Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Tim Berners-Lee and Mark Fischetti. 2001. Weaving the Web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the WWW by its inventor. DIANE Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alessandro Bessi, Mauro Coletto, George Davidescu, 2015. Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PloS one 10, 2 (2015), e0118093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Olivier Boissier, Rafael Bordini, 2013. Multi-agent oriented programming with JaCaMo. Science of Computer Programming 78, 6 (2013), 747–761.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Amit Chopra and Munindar Singh. 2016. From social machines to social protocols: Software engineering foundations for sociotechnical systems. In Proc. of the 25th Int. Conf. on WWW. Int. WWW Conferences Steering Committee, 903–914.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Miriam Fernandez and Harith Alani. 2018. Online misinformation: Challenges and future directions. In Comp. Proc. of TWC2018. 595–602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Simson L Garfinkel. 2008. Wikipedia and the Meaning of Truth. Technology Review 111, 6 (2008), 84–86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lucas Graves. 2018. Understanding the promise and limits of automated fact-checking. Reuters Institute, University of Oxford 2 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jim Hendler and Tim Berners-Lee. 2010. From the Semantic Web to social machines: A research challenge for AI on the WWW. Artificial Intelligence 174, 2 (2010), 156–161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jomi Hübner, Jaime Sichman, and Olivier Boissier. 2007. Developing organised MAS using the MOISE+ model: programming issues at the system and agent levels. Int. J. of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering 1, 3-4(2007), 370–395.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Nicholas Jennings and Michael Wooldridge. 1998. Applications of Intelligent Agents. In Agent Technology: Foundations, Applications, and Markets, Nicholas Jennings and Michael Wooldridge (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3–28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Miriam Metzger, Andrew Flanagin, Keren Eyal, 2003. Credibility for the 21st Century. Annals of the Int. Communication Assoc. 27, 1 (2003), 293–335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Dave Murray-Rust, Ognjen Scekic, 2014. A collaboration model for community-based software development with social machines. 10th IEEE Int. Conf. on Collaborative Computing (2014), 84–93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Petros Papapanagiotou, Alan Davoust, Dave Murray-Rust, 2018. Social Machines for All. In Proc. of the 17th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and MAS (Stockholm, Sweden) (AAMAS ’18). Int. Foundation for Autonomous Agents and MAS, 1208–1212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Georg Rehm, Julian Moreno-Schneider, and Peter Bourgonje. 2018. Automatic and Manual Web Annotations in an Infrastructure to handle Fake News and other Online Media Phenomena. Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Robert Sanderson. 2017. Web Annotation Protocol. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-protocol/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Robert Sanderson, Paolo Ciccarese, and Benjamin Young. 2017. Web Annotation Vocabulary. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-vocab/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jennifer Skeem and Christopher Lowenkamp. 2016. Risk, Race, and Recidivism: Predictive Bias And Disparate Impact. Criminology 54, 4 (2016), 680–712.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Paul Smart and Nigel Shadbolt. 2015. Social machines. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition. IGI Global, 6855–6862.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. James Thorne and Andreas Vlachos. 2018. Automated fact checking: Task formulations, methods and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.07687(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359, 6380 (2018), 1146–1151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Byron C Wallace. 2015. Computational irony: A survey and new perspectives. Artificial Intelligence Review 43, 4 (2015), 467–483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Gerhard Weiss. 2000. MAS: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Alexandra-Madalina Zarafin, Antoine Zimmermann, and Olivier Boissier. 2012. Integrating Semantic Web Technologies and MAS: A Semantic Description of Multi-Agent Organizations. In Proc. of the First Int. Conf. on Agreement Technologies(CEUR WS), Vol. 918. 296–297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Amy Zhang, Martin Robbins, Ed Bice, 2018. A Structured Response to Misinformation. In Comp. of The Web Conf. 2018. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Designing Social Machines for Tackling Online Disinformation
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              WWW '20: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020
              April 2020
              854 pages
              ISBN:9781450370240
              DOI:10.1145/3366424

              Copyright © 2020 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 20 April 2020

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format