skip to main content
10.1145/3366424.3385776acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Diffusion of Mainstream and Disinformation News on Twitter: The Case of Italy and France

Published: 20 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In this work we provide preliminary results from an ongoing investigation on the Twitter diffusion of news pertaining to two classes of sources, namely websites which notably produce disinformation, i.e. misleading and harmful information, opposed to more traditional and mainstream websites which instead publish credible information. We used the Twitter Streaming API to collect a large-scale dataset of thousands of tweets containing links to news articles in two different countries, Italy and France. We show that mainstream news outlets generate a much larger engagement in both settings, with a larger discrepancy between the two news domains in France. We also show that only a handful of Italian outlets actively engage with Twitter users, whereas in France there is a larger number of outlets sharing misleading information which exhibit a non-negligible volume of shares. We observe a strong tendency towards sharing mainstream news in those users who also share non-credible information in both countries. Analyzing the diffusion networks of distinct news domains and countries, we observed that disinformation networks are more clustered and connected, but much smaller than the mainstream ones (with the largest discrepancy in the French scenario).

References

[1]
[n.d.]. Le Decodex, un outil de verification de l’information. Available at https://www.lemonde.fr/verification/.
[2]
AGCOM. 2018. News vs Fake nel sistema dell’informazione. Report available at: https://www.agcom.it/documents/10179/12791486/Pubblicazione+23-11-2018/93869b4f-0a8d-4380-aad2-c10a0e426d83?version=1.0(2018).
[3]
Albert-László Barabási 2016. Network science. Cambridge university press.
[4]
Marco T Bastos and Dan Mercea. 2019. The Brexit botnet and user-generated hyperpartisan news. Social Science Computer Review 37, 1 (2019), 38–54.
[5]
Alexandre Bovet and Hernán A Makse. 2019. Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Nature Communications 10, 1 (2019), 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2
[6]
Guido Caldarelli, Rocco De Nicola, Fabio Del Vigna, Marinella Petrocchi, and Fabio Saracco. 2019. The role of bot squads in the political propaganda on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.12687(2019).
[7]
Michele Cantarella, Nicolò Fraccaroli, and Roberto Volpe. 2019. Does Fake News Affect Voting Behaviour?Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3402913 (2019).
[8]
Emilio Ferrara. 2017. Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election. First Monday 22, 8 (2017).
[9]
Fabio Giglietto, Laura Iannelli, Luca Rossi, Augusto Valeriani, Nicola Righetti, Francesca Carabini, Giada Marino, Stefano Usai, and Elisabetta Zurovac. 2018. Mapping Italian News Media Political Coverage in the Lead-Up to 2018 General Election. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3179930 (2018).
[10]
Nir Grinberg, Kenneth Joseph, Lisa Friedland, Briony Swire-Thompson, and David Lazer. 2019. Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science 363, 6425 (2019), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706 arXiv:http://science.sciencemag.org/content/363/6425/374.full.pdf
[11]
Philip N Howard, Samantha Bradshaw, Bence Kollanyi, and Gillian Bolsolver. [n.d.]. Junk News and Bots during the French Presidential Election: What Are French Voters Sharing Over Twitter In Round Two?
[12]
David M. J. Lazer, Matthew A. Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J. Berinsky, Kelly M. Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J. Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, Michael Schudson, Steven A. Sloman, Cass R. Sunstein, Emily A. Thorson, Duncan J. Watts, and Jonathan L. Zittrain. 2018. The science of fake news. Science 359, 6380 (2018), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998 arXiv:http://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6380/1094.full.pdf
[13]
Fred Morstatter, Jürgen Pfeffer, Huan Liu, and Kathleen M Carley. 2013. Is the sample good enough? comparing data from twitter’s streaming api with twitter’s firehose. In Seventh international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
[14]
Mark Newman. 2018. Networks. Oxford university press.
[15]
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, Nic Newman, Richard Fletcher, and Antonis Kalogeropoulos. 2019. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Report of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (2019).
[16]
Francesco Pierri, Alessandro Artoni, and Stefano Ceri. 2020. Investigating Italian disinformation spreading on Twitter in the context of 2019 European elections. PloS one 15, 1 (2020), e0227821.
[17]
Francesco Pierri and Stefano Ceri. 2019. False news on social media: a data-driven survey. ACM Sigmod Record 48(2)(2019).
[18]
Francesco Pierri, Carlo Piccardi, and Stefano Ceri. 2020. Topology comparison of Twitter diffusion networks effectively reveals misleading news. Scientific reports 10(2020), 1372.
[19]
Adrien Senecat. 2018. Les fausses informations circulent de moins en moins sur Facebook. LeMonde (2018). https://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2018/10/17/les-fausses-informations-perdent-du-terrain-sur-facebook_5370461_4355770.html
[20]
Chengcheng Shao, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2016. Hoaxy: A Platform for Tracking Online Misinformation. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (WWW ’16 Companion). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2890098
[21]
Chengcheng Shao, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Onur Varol, Kai-Cheng Yang, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2018. The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature Communications 9, 1 (2018), 4787.
[22]
Chengcheng Shao, Pik-Mai Hui, Lei Wang, Xinwen Jiang, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer, and Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia. 2018. Anatomy of an online misinformation network. PLOS ONE 13, 4 (04 2018), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196087
[23]
Massimo Stella, Marco Cristoforetti, and Manlio De Domenico. 2019. Influence of augmented humans in online interactions during voting events. PloS one 14, 5 (2019).
[24]
Massimo Stella, Emilio Ferrara, and Manlio De Domenico. 2018. Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 49(2018), 12435–12440.
[25]
Michela Del Vicario, Walter Quattrociocchi, Antonio Scala, and Fabiana Zollo. 2019. Polarization and fake news: Early warning of Potential misinformation targets. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB) 13, 2 (2019), 10.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)The Dawn of Decentralized Social Media: An Exploration of Bluesky’s Public OpeningSocial Networks Analysis and Mining10.1007/978-3-031-78541-2_26(422-437)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2025
  • (2024)Misinformation and Polarization around COVID-19 vaccines in France, Germany, and ItalyProceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference10.1145/3614419.3644020(119-128)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
  • (2024)A Longitudinal Study of Italian and French Reddit Conversations Around the Russian Invasion of UkraineProceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference10.1145/3614419.3644012(22-30)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The Diffusion of Mainstream and Disinformation News on Twitter: The Case of Italy and France
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WWW '20: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020
          April 2020
          854 pages
          ISBN:9781450370240
          DOI:10.1145/3366424
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Sponsors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 20 April 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. Twitter
          2. disinformation
          3. network science

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Conference

          WWW '20
          Sponsor:
          WWW '20: The Web Conference 2020
          April 20 - 24, 2020
          Taipei, Taiwan

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
          Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2025)The Dawn of Decentralized Social Media: An Exploration of Bluesky’s Public OpeningSocial Networks Analysis and Mining10.1007/978-3-031-78541-2_26(422-437)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2025
          • (2024)Misinformation and Polarization around COVID-19 vaccines in France, Germany, and ItalyProceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference10.1145/3614419.3644020(119-128)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
          • (2024)A Longitudinal Study of Italian and French Reddit Conversations Around the Russian Invasion of UkraineProceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference10.1145/3614419.3644012(22-30)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
          • (2024)Computational approaches for cyber social threatsEPJ Data Science10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00504-y13:1Online publication date: 28-Oct-2024
          • (2023)Global Misinformation Spillovers in the Vaccination Debate Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multilingual Twitter StudyJMIR Infodemiology10.2196/447143(e44714)Online publication date: 24-May-2023
          • (2022)Digital false information at scale in the European Union: Current state of research in various disciplines, and future directionsNew Media & Society10.1177/1461444822112214625:10(2800-2819)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2022
          • (2022)Inference of User Desires to Spread Disinformation Based on Social Situation Analytics and Group EffectIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing10.1109/TDSC.2022.3165324(1-1)Online publication date: 2022
          • (2021)Information disorders during the COVID-19 infodemic: The case of Italian FacebookOnline Social Networks and Media10.1016/j.osnem.2021.10012422(100124)Online publication date: Mar-2021
          • (2020)A multi-layer approach to disinformation detection in US and Italian news spreading on TwitterEPJ Data Science10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00253-89:1Online publication date: 23-Nov-2020

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Figures

          Tables

          Media

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media