skip to main content
10.1145/3368308.3415406acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiteConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Teaching Flooding Attack to the SDN Data Plane with POGIL

Published:07 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) is a teaching technique that engages students in active learning and develops student process skills including critical thinking, problem solving, and teamwork. POGIL uses activities that are designed to guide students through questions to formulate patterns and relationships toward concept exploration. This paper describes the POGIL activities we developed for teaching Flooding Attack to the Software Defined Network (SDN) Data Plane, and our experience teaching this topic using POGIL These POGIL activities can be used by other educators in network security courses.

References

  1. C.C. Bonwell and J.A. Eison. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ERIC Digest.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Baldwin. 1996. Discovery learning in computer science. In Proceedings of the 27th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, March 1996, Philadelphia. ACM Inc., 222--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J.J. McConnell. 2005. Active and cooperative learning: tips and tricks (part I). ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 37, 2, 27--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J.E. Miller and J.E. Groccia. 1997. Are four heads better than one? A comparison of cooperative and traditional teaching formats in an introductory biology course. Innovative Higher Education, 21, 4, 253--273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. L.L. Beck and A.W. Chizhik. 2008. An experimental study of cooperative learning in cs1. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40, 1, 205--209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. Gonzalez. 2006. A systematic approach to active and cooperative learning in CS1 and its effects on CS2. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, March 1--6, 2006, Houston, Texas. SIGCSE, 133--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Writing Guidelines, 2019. Accessed 2019. [Online]. Available: https://pogil.org/authoring-materials/writing-guidelinesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Wang, L. Xu, and G. Gu. 2015. Floodguard: A DOS attack prevention extension in software-defined networks. In 2015 45th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. IEEE, 239--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shaghaghi, A., Kaafar, M.A., Buyya, R. and Jha, S., 2020. Software-Defined Network (SDN) Data Plane Security: Issues, Solutions, and Future Directions. In Handbook of Computer Networks and Cyber Security (pp. 341--387). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yuan, X., Zhang, T., Shama, A.A., Xu, J., Yang, L., Ellis, J., He, W. and Waters, C., 2019, October. Teaching Cybersecurity Using Guided Inquiry Collaborative Learning. In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1--6). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yang, L., Yuan, X., He, W., Ellis, J. and Land, J., 2019, February. Cybersecurity Education with POGIL. In Journal of The Colloquium for Information System Security Education (Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 14--14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S.J. Cold. 2013. Partially flipped: experiences using POGIL. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGITE Conference on Information Technology Education, October 2013. ACM Inc., 133--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. H.H. Hu and T.D. Shepherd. 2014. Teaching CS 1 with POGIL activities and roles. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, March 2014. ACM Inc., 127--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. Kussmaul. 2012. Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) for computer science. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education, February 2012. ACM Inc., 373--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H.H. Hu, C. Kussmaul, B. Knaeble, C. Mayfield, and A. Yadav. 2016. Results from a survey of faculty adoption of process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) in computer science. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, July 2016. ACM Inc., 186--191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hu, H.H. and Shepherd, T.D., 2013. Using POGIL to help students learn to program. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 13(3), pp.1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Teaching Flooding Attack to the SDN Data Plane with POGIL

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGITE '20: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education
        October 2020
        446 pages
        ISBN:9781450370455
        DOI:10.1145/3368308

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 October 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate176of429submissions,41%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader