skip to main content
10.1145/3368640.3368649acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An experimental study of IoT transmission power, in outdoor environment, using Crossbow TelosB nodes

Published:28 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Planning and deploying a functional large scale Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) or a Network of Internet of Things (IoTs) is a challenging task, especially in complex urban environments. The typical complex urban environment distorts the RF signal from nodes due to multipath and as a result the connectivity of the network could be problematic. The need for accurate and reliable network simulators is mandatory to extract meaningful results. The fact that existing network layer simulators are unable to accurately simulate the physical layer effects, renders them inefficient to provide those results. In this work, we experimentally measure the signal strength of Crossbow TelosB node in different setups. The observations indicate that the actual behaviour of wireless nodes is highly variable and bimodal. Such an outcome stipulates the need of utilizing effective cross-layer simulators that can incorporate the physical layer conditions, in order to accurately simulate the performance of IoT networks in a complex urban environment.

References

  1. 2019. MICAZ node Datasheet. http://www.memsic.com/userfiles/files/Datasheets/WSN/micaz_datasheet-t.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Giacomo Brambilla, Marco Picone, Simone Cirani, Michele Amoretti, and Francesco Zanichelli. 2014. A Simulation Platform for Large-scale Internet of Things Scenarios in Urban Environments. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on IoT in Urban Space (URB-IOT '14). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), ICST, Brussels, Belgium, Belgium, 50--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mihal Brumbulli and Emmanuel Gaudin. 2016. Towards Model-Driven Simulation of the Internet of Things. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer International Publishing, 17--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. G. D'Angelo, S. Ferretti, and V. Ghini. 2016. Simulation of the Internet of Things. In 2016 International Conference on High Performance Computing Simulation (HPCS). 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Xingjian Ding, Guodong Sun, Gaoxiang Yang, and Xinna Shang. 2016. Link Investigation of IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Sensor Networks in Forests. Sensors 16, 7 (2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Dongjin Son, B. Krishnamachari, and J. Heidemann. 2004. Experimental study of the effects of transmission power control and blacklisting in wireless sensor networks. In 2004 First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2004. IEEE SECON 2004. 289--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fractal Networx Limited. 2017. TruNET wireless, www.fractalnetworx.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Alexander Gluhak, Srdjan Krco, Michele Nati, Dennis Pfisterer, Nathalie Mitton, and Tahiry Razafindralambo. 2011. A survey on facilities for experimental internet of things research. IEEE Communications Magazine 49, 11 (2011), 58--67. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ngoc Son Han, Gyu Myoung Lee, Noel Crespi, Nguyen Van Luong, Kyongwoo Heo, Mihaela Brut, and Patrick GATELLIER. 2014. DPWSim: A simulation toolkit for IoT applications using devices profile for web services. In 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT). Seoul, South Korea, 544--547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Loizos Kanaris, Akis Kokkinis, Giancarlo Fortino, Antonio Liotta, and Stavros Stavrou. 2016. Sample Size Determination Algorithm for fingerprint-based indoor localization systems. Computer Networks 101 (2016), 169--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Loizos Kanaris, Charalampos Sergiou, Akis Kokkinis, Aris Pafitis, Nikos Antoniou, and Stavros Stavrou. 2019. On the Realistic Radio and Network Planning of IoT Sensor Networks. Sensors 19, 15 (2019). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. D. Rojas and J. Barrett. 2016. Experimental Analysis of a Wireless Sensor Network in a Multi-Chamber Metal Environment. In European Wireless 2016; 22th European Wireless Conference. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Weisheng Tang, Xiaoyuan Ma, Jianming Wei, and Zhi Wang. 2019. Measurement and Analysis of Near-Ground Propagation Models under Different Terrains for Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors 19, 8 (2019). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Y. M. Yusof, A. K. M. M. Islam, and S. Baharun. 2015. An experimental study of WSN transmission power optimisation using MICAz motes. In 2015 International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering (ICAEE). 182--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. An experimental study of IoT transmission power, in outdoor environment, using Crossbow TelosB nodes

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PCI '19: Proceedings of the 23rd Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
      November 2019
      165 pages
      ISBN:9781450372923
      DOI:10.1145/3368640

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 November 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      PCI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate18of35submissions,51%Overall Acceptance Rate190of390submissions,49%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader