skip to main content
10.1145/3368756.3368963acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmartcityappConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Vertical flow constructed wetland a green technology to improve sanitation in future smart cities of Morocco

Published:02 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

1In order to improve the quality of smart city environment, health and well-being of their residents, the choice of a sustainable, economical and efficient technique adapted to the area conditions, becomes a necessity. To do this in Moroccan conditions, a pilot scale of Subsurface-vertical flow constructed wetland system (VFCW) was designed to treat domestic wastewater and his performance was investigated. This filter was planted by Chrosopogon zizanioides L. with a density of 4 plants/m2. Several water quality parameters including BOD5, COD, TSS, NH4+, NO3- and PO43- were monitored. The main treatment performance results showed the following average removal rates: BOD5 (79±13%), COD (80±11%), TSS (83±10%), NH4+(47±23%), PO43- (68±9%). The quality of the treated wastewaters was evaluated according to Moroccan Reject Limit Value (RLV).

References

  1. Corcoran, E.; Nellemann, C.; Baker, E.; Bos, R.; Osborn, D.; Savelli, H. 2010. Sick Water? The central role of wastewater management in sustainable development. A Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), UN-HABITAT, GRID-ArendalGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Vymazal, J. 2011. Plants used in constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow: a review. Hydrobiologia 674, 133--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Wu, S., Kuschk, P., Brix, H., Vymazal, J., Dong, R. 2014. Development of constructed wetlands in performance intensifications for wastewater treatment: a nitrogen and organic matter targeted review. Water Res. 57C, 40--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. High Commissioner of Planning (HCP), 2015. The Morocco between Millennium Goals for the Development and objectives of Sustainable development Achievements and challenges; National Report August.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouhlal, A. 2018. Etude de la valorization du lagunage d'épuration des eaux uses d'Ain Taoujdate (Région Fès - Meknès Maroc) par des traitements complémentaires de phytoremediation, physic-chimique et bactériologique. Thèse NP : 174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Taouraout A., Chahlaoui A., Belghyti D., Najy M., Taha I., and Kharroubi A. 2019. Perceptions and Attitudes of the Rural Population of Morocco Towards EcoSan Latrines UDDTs. The Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Smart City Applications © Springer Nature Switzerland AG.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Watson RT, Zakri AH. 2008. Living beyond our means. Natural assets and human well-being. Statement from the Board. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sutton et al.; Sutton MA, Howard CM, Willem Erisman J, Billen G, Bleeker A, Grennfelt P, vanGrinsven H, Grizzetti B (Eds). 2011. European Nitrogen Assessment: Sources, Effects and Policy Perspectives. University of Cambridge Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. United Nations. 2016. Agenda items 5, 6 and 18 (a) High-level segment High-level political forum on sustainable development, convened under the auspices of the Economic and Social Council Economic and environmental questions: sustainable development Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals Report of the Secretary-General.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Vymazal, J., Brix, H., Cooper, P.F., Green, M.B., Haberl, R. (Eds.). 1998. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment in Europe. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, P. 1999. A review of the design and performance of vertical-flow and hybrid reed bed treatment systems. Water Science and Technology 40 (3), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Laber, J., Perfler, R., Haberl, R. 1997. Two strategies for advanced nitrogen elimination in vertical flow constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology 35 (5), 71--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Arias, C.A., Brix, H., Marti, E. 2005. Recycling of treated effluents enhances removal of total nitrogen in vertical flow constructed wetlands. J. Environ. Sci. Health 40, 1431--1443.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sklarz, M.Y., Gross, A., Yakirevich, A., Soares, M.I.M. 2009. A recirculating vertical flow constructed wetland for the treatment of domestic wastewater. Desalination 246, 617--624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Zapater, M., Gross, A., Soares, M.I.M. 2011. Capacity of an on-site recirculating vertical flow constructed wetlands to withstand disturbances and highly variable influent quality. Ecological Engineering 37, 1572--1577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Porst-Boucle, S., Molle, P. 2012. Recirculation on a single stage of vertical flow constructed wetland: treatment limits and operation modes. Ecological Engineering 43, 81--84Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Boutin, C., Liénard, A., Esser, D., 1997. Development of a new generation of reed-bed filters in France: first results. Water Science and Technology 35 (5), 315--322Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Molle, P., Liénard, A., Boutin, C., Merlin, G., Iwema, A., 2005. How to treat raw sewage with constructed wetlands: an overview of the French systems. Water Science and Technology 51 (9), 11--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Rodier 2009. Analyse de l'eau (eaux naturelles, eaux résiduaires, eau de mer) : physico-chimie, microbiologie, biologie, interprétation des résultats, 9ème édition, Dunod, Paris, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang, D., Gersberg, R.M., Keat, T.S., 2009. Review constructed wetlands in China. Ecol. Eng. 35, 1367--1378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Kadlec, R.H., 2003. Status of treatment wetlands in North America. In: Dias, V., Vymazal, J. (Eds.), Proceeding Conference of the Use of Aquatic Macrophytes for Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands. ICN and INAG, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 363--401.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Molle, P., S. Prost-Boucle, and A. Lienard. 2008. Potential for total nitrogen removal by combining vertical flow and horizontal flow constructed wetlands: A full-scale experiment study: Ecological Engineering, v. 34, p. 23--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Morvannou, A., N. Forquet, S. Michel, S. Troesch, and P. Molle. 2015. Treatment performances of French constructed wetlands: Results from a database collected over the last 30 years: Water Science and Technology, v. 71, p. 1333--1339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Paing, J., A. Guilbert, V. Gagnon, and F. Chazarenc, 2015, Effect of climate, wastewater composition, loading rates, system age and design on performances of French vertical flow constructed wetlands: A survey based on 169 full scale systems: Ecological Engineering, v. 80, p. 46--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Brix, H. 1997. Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Science and Technology 35 (5), 11--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Stefanakis, A. I., and V. A. Tsihrintzis, 2012, Effects of loading, resting period, temperature, porous media, vegetation and aeration on performance of pilot-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands: Chemical Engineering Journal, v. 181 182, p.416--430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Abou-Elela, S.I., Hellal, M.S., 2012. Municipal wastewater treatment using vertical flow constructed wetlands planted with Canna, Phragmites and Cyperus. Ecol.Eng. 47, 209--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Zurita, F., De Anda, J., Belmont, M.A., 2009. Treatment of domestic wastewater and production of commercial flowers in vertical and horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 35, 861--869.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Guan, Y., Zhang, Y., Huang, X., & Fu, J. 2015. Effect of operating factors on the contaminants removal of a soil filter: multi-soil-layering system. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74(3), 2679--2686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SCA '19: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart City Applications
    October 2019
    788 pages
    ISBN:9781450362894
    DOI:10.1145/3368756

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 2 October 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader