skip to main content
10.1145/3368756.3369011acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmartcityappConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Establishment of diagnostic reference level of abdominopelvic CT procedure of university hospital center Mohammed VI, Oujda

Published:02 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Background: Everyday, physicians daily use different X- ray's technologies to diagnose cancer in order to save thousands of lives. The use of CT in medical diagnosis, administers radiation doses to patients that are higher than those from other radiological procedures. It has been estimated that Computed Tomography examinations make up around 20% of radiologic procedures and contribute by approximately 80% to the radiation medical exposure doses. Purpose: The goal of this study is to estimate the doses delivered during abdominopelvic Computed Tomography (CT) procedures in order to establish local diagnostic reference level (DRL) of University Hospital Center Mohamed VI of Oujda. Materials and methods: All CT examinations are performed with a scanner GENERAL ELECTRIC (GE) Optima CT 540. A total of 30 patients were examined in emergency radiology department. The data was collected from Abdomen- pelvic examinations. For each examination, CT acquisition parameters were reported, including number of series, use of contrast medium, tube kV, tube current and rotation time, slice thickness, the displayed CT dose index (CTDIvol) and the Dose Length Product (DLP). Effective dose and DRL were estimated using the International Commission on Radiological Protection conversion factors (ICRP 2007).

Results: The average weight and age of patients who have benefited from the abdominopelvic CT scan are equal respectively to (59.27 ± 10.21) Kg and (25.10 ± 4.75) years. Tube voltage (kV), tube current and rotation time were 120 (kV), 275 (mA) and 1,75 (s) respectively. The average displayed CT dose index

CTDIvol were (8.37± 2.52) mGy. The average dose length product (DLP) was (416.48 ± 153.53) mGy cm. The average effective dose received by patient during an abdominopelvic CT scan was (6.41 ± 2.36) mSv.

Conclusion: The dose values of this study were comparable to the international reference levels of this CT examination. CT dose Optimization protocol is not implemented in the Moroccan hospitals. These values could be used as our hospital's Dose Reference Levels (DRL) until a more extensive detailed study survey is organized in Morocco for the establishment of the country's reference level.

References

  1. Suetens, Paul. Fundamentals of medical imaging. Cambridge university press, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Tortora, Gerard J., and Bryan Derrickson. Principles of anatomy & physiology. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Weissleder, Ralph. "Molecular imaging in cancer." Science 312.5777 (2006): 1168--1171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Stone, Samantha. "Communicating With Patients Undergoing Abdominopelvic CT Imaging." (2018): 76--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Giannitto, Caterina, et al. "Unindicated multiphase CT scans in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies for women of reproductive age: a significant source of unnecessary exposure." La radiologia medica 123.3 (2018): 185--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Brenner, D. J., & Hall, E. J. (2007). Computed Tomography --- An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(22), 2277--2284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Data for protection against ionizing radiation from external sources. Bethesda, MD. ICRP Report 21: Publication 60; 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological protection and safety in medicine. Bethesda, MD. ICRP Report 26; Publication 73; 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. http://www.icrp.org/docs/DRL_for_web.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement Diagnostic. Reference levels and achievable doses in medical and dental imaging: recommendations for the United States. Bethesda, MD. NCRP Report-172; 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ma S, Kong B, Liu B, Liu X. Biological effects of low-dose radiation from computed tomography scanning. Int J Radiat Biol. 2013 May;89(5):326--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Elgazzar A.H., Kazem N. (2006) Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation. In: Elgazzar A.H. (eds) The Pathophysiologic Basis of Nuclear Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Harrison, J. D., et al. "Use of effective dose." Annals of the ICRP 45.1_suppl (2016): 215--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. AMSSNuR, Société Marocaine de radiologie - Samedi 10 décembre, 2016, Rabat. https://amssnur.org.ma/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/AMSSNuR-actua.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Semghouli S, Amaoui B, A. El Kharras, K. Bouyakhlef, O K. Hakam, A. Choukri (2017): Establishment of A Diagnostic Reference Level For Brain CT Procedures In Moroccan Hospitals. International Journal of Advanced Research 5(5) 319--324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Semghouli S, Amaoui B, Hakam O.K and Choukri A. (2018). Radiation exposure during pelvimetry CT procedures in Ibn Sina Children's Hospital of Rabat. Radiation Physics and Chemistry (in press). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Semghouli. S, Amaoui. B, El Kharras. A, Bouykhlaf. K, Hakam O. K, Choukri. A. (2019). Evaluation of Radiation Risks during CT Brain Procedures for Adults. Perspectives in Science Journal (in press). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. ICRP, 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37 (2--4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. K M. Kanal, P F. Butler, D. Sengupta, M Bhargavan-Chatfield, L P. Coombs, RL. Morin: U.S. Diagnostic reference levels and achievable Doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology: Volume 284: Number 1--July 2017 pp 120--133. radiology.rsna.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Public Health England. Guidance, National Diagnostic Reference Levels: 22 January 2016 to 14 November 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diagnostic-radiology-national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls/national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls#national-drls-for-ct-examinations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Canadian Computed Tomography Survey. National Diagnostic Reference Levels. Health Canada, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Japan Diagnostic Reference Levels Based on Latest Surveys in Japan. Available from http://www.radher.jp/J-RIME/report/DRLhoukokusyoEng.pdf ; 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Australian National Adult Diagnostic Reference Levels for MDCT. http://www.arpansa.gov.au/services/ndrl/adult.cfm ; 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Roch P, Aubert B. French diagnostic reference levels in diagnostic radiology, computed tomography and nuclear medicine: 2004--2008 review. Radiat Prot Dosim 2013;154(1):52--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Salama DH, Vassileva J, Mahdaly G, Shawki M, Salama A, Gilley D, Rehani MM. Establishing national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for computed tomography in Egypt. Phys Med. 2017 Jul; 39:16--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SCA '19: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart City Applications
    October 2019
    788 pages
    ISBN:9781450362894
    DOI:10.1145/3368756

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 2 October 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader