Mischelle A. Esguerra
ABSTRACT
The rapid growth of the Internet had brought several transformations in today's teaching and learning process. The use of Web 2.0 technologies and e-learning platforms are becoming popular in higher education particularly in graduate school. Educators used these tools to foster student engagement and strengthen their learning experiences. However, not all faculty members are using Web 2.0 tools. This study sought to identify the issues and concerns in the implementation of Web 2.0 on the teaching and learning process and proposes strategies to properly deploy Web 2.0 technologies. The findings of this study provide valuable insights and strategies for integrating Web 2.0 that will serve as a reference by faculty members teaching the graduate school.
- Berlanga, A. J., Peñalvo, F. G., and Sloep, P. B. 2010. Towards eLearning 2.0 University. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(3), 199--201. doi:10.1080/10494820.2010. 500498Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Brown, L. (2008, March 6). Student faces Facebook consequences. Toronto Star. Accessed February 23, 2016 from: http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/309855Google Scholar
- Cavanaugh, C., Hargis, J., Kamali, T. and Soto, M. 2013. Substitution to augmentation: faculty adoption of iPad mobile learning in higher education. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 10(4), 270--284Google ScholarCross Ref
- Churchill, D. (2007). Web 2.0 and possibilities for educational applications. Educational Technology.Google Scholar
- Churchill, D. 2011. Web 2.0 in education: a study of the explorative use of blogs with a postgraduate class. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(2), 149--158. doi:10.1080/14703297.2011.564009Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cifuentes, L., Sharp, A., Bulu, S., Benz, M., and Stough, L. M. 2009. Developing a Web 2.0-based system with user- authored content for community use and teacher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 377--398. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9141-xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Collis, B., and Moonen, J. 2008. Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: quality perspectives. Educational Media International, 45(2), 93--106. doi:10.1080/09523980802107179Google ScholarCross Ref
- Creighton, P. M. (2012). The Secret Reasons why Teachers are Not Using Web 2.0 Tools and what School Librarians Can Do about it. ABC-CLIOGoogle Scholar
- Grosseck, G. 2009. To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 478--482. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.087Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hall, R. (2008). The impact of the read/write web on learner agency. E-Learning and Digital Media, 5(3), 284--296Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hargadon, S. (2008). Web 2.0 is the future of education. Education Technology: Web 2.0, Educational Networking, Free and Open Source Software, and the Future of EducationGoogle Scholar
- Harris, A. L., & Rea, A. (2009). Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies: A growing impact on IS education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 137.Google Scholar
- Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47--64.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Holmes, K.L.and Dubinsky, E.K.2009.Integration of Web 2.0 technologies in the translational research environment. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 28(4), 309--335. doi:10.1080/02763860903249027Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. NYU press.Google Scholar
- Karunasena, A., Deng, H., and Zhang, X. 2012. A Web 2.0 based e-learning success model in higher education.Google Scholar
- Kesim, E., and Agaoglu, E. 2007. A paradigm shift in distance education: Web 2.0 and social software. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(3), 66--75.Google Scholar
- Koshi, L. 2013. Web based education. University News, 51(29), 14--16.Google Scholar
- Lawson, M. (2005). Berners-Lee on the read/write web. BBC News, 9.Google Scholar
- Mabuan, R., & Ebron Jr, G. (2017, November). Facebook Integration into University Classes: Opportunities and Challenges. In Proceedings of the 31st Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (pp. 265--273).Google Scholar
- Majhi, S., & Maharana, B. (2011). Familiarity of Web2. 0 and its application in learning: A case study of two Indian Universities. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(6), 120--129.Google Scholar
- Majid, N. A. A. (2014). Integration of web 2.0 tools in learning a programming course. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(4).Google Scholar
- Maleko Munguatosha, G., Birevu Muyinda, P., & Thaddeus Lubega, J. (2011). A social networked learning adoption model for higher education institutions in developing countries. On the Horizon, 19(4), 307--320.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mijares, T. S., Bustamante, R. A., Ayo, E. B., Anacio, M. L., & Jotic, R. N. (2017). THE ROLE OF OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES (OERS) AND WEB 2.0 IN TRANSFORMING PEDAGOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION--IMPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE. Asian Journal of Educational Research Vol, 5(1).Google Scholar
- Mohamed H.K. and Sumitha, E. 2011. Perception and use of social networking sites by the students of Calicut University. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 31(4), 295--301.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O'Reilly, T. (2005). O'Reilly Spreading the Knowledge of Innovators. What is web, 2.Google Scholar
- Prensky, M. R. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Corwin Press.Google Scholar
- Rosen, D., and Nelson, C. 2008. Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25(3-4), 211--225. doi:10.1080/07380560802370997Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tolisano, S. R. (2008). Web 2.0 tools can promote literacy and global awareness. Leadership Compass, 5(4), 7--9.Google Scholar
- Safran,C.,Helic,D.,andGütl,C.2007.E-Learningpractices and Web 2.0. In Proceedings of the International Conference of 'Interactive computer aided learning'ICL2007: E-Portofolio and Quality in e-Learning. Available at: http:// halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00197260/Google Scholar
- Salac, R. A., & Kim, Y. S. (n.d.). Internet Connectivity in the Philippines. Retrieved from http://koreascience.or.kr/article/ArticleFullRecord.jsp?cn=KHDHB8_2016_v1n1_67Google Scholar
- Simões, L.,and Borges Gouveia,L.2011.Web2.0 and higher education: pedagogical implications. Available at: http://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2099/5736Google Scholar
- Strawbridge, F. 2010. Is there a case for Web 2.0 in higher education? Do the benefits outweigh the risks? Available at: http://online.education.ed.ac.uk/gallery/strawbridge_web_2. pdfGoogle Scholar
- Stuart, D. (October/November, 2009). Web 2.0 fails to ex- cite today's researchers. Research Information. Retrieved August 15, 2014, from http://www.researchinformation.info/ features/feature.php?feature_id=236Google Scholar
- Tagg, J. (2003). The learning paradigm college. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Thompson, J. (2007). Is Education 1.0 ready for Web 2.0 students?. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4).Google Scholar
- Tyagi, S., & Kumar, K. (2011). Web 2.0 for teaching, learning and assessment in higher education: A case study of universities in Western Uttar Pradesh (India). International Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(11), 230--241.Google Scholar
- Ullrich, C., Borau, K., Luo, H., Tan, X., Shen, L., and Shen, R. 2008. Why web 2.0 is good for learning and for research: principles and prototypes. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 705--714). Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1367593Google Scholar
- Usman, S. H., & Oyefolahan, I. O. (2014). Encouraging knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.7437.Google Scholar
- Wankel, L. A., and Blessinger, P. 2012. New vistas in higher education: an introduction to using social technologies. In Laura A. Wankel, Patrick Blessinger (ed.) Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Social Technologies (Cutting-edge Technologies in Higher Education, Volume 6), Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 3--16. doi:10.1108/ S2044-9968(2012)000006B003Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Educational Applications of Web 2.0: Strategies to Enrich the Teaching and Learning in the Graduate School
Recommendations
Usability and Educational Affordance of Web 2.0 tools from Teachers’ Perspectives
PCI '20: Proceedings of the 24th Pan-Hellenic Conference on InformaticsThe emergence of Web 2.0 technologies has provided new opportunities for creating and sharing content and interacting with peers. In education, Web 2.0 can be used by instructors as a tool to promote distance and collaborative learning without requiring ...
Exploring pre-service teachers' beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom
This qualitative study explored pre-service teachers' behavioral, normative, and control beliefs regarding their intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies in their future classrooms. The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) was used as the theoretical ...
Teaching style, ICT experience and teachers' attitudes toward teaching with Web 2.0
Emphasis on 21st Century Skills development has increased expectations on teachers to take advantages of emerging technologies to support student learning. Yet it is not clear whether teachers are well equipped with the necessary skills, support, and ...
Comments