skip to main content
10.1145/3369255.3369260acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicetcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessing the Effectiveness of Teaching Anatomy with Virtual Reality

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

When performing medical procedures, physicians must rely on their mental representations to understand complex internal structures that are not directly visible on the skin. In their training, this knowledge is acquired through the study of two-dimensional images. Currently, virtual reality (VR) is revolutionizing the teaching-learning process because it offers an experiential, low cost and easy to manage alternative for teaching anatomy. Especially if compared with performing cadaveric practices.

The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of virtual reality for teaching anatomy.

The design was quantitative and quasi-experimental. Three groups were defined for analysis: the self-directed practice of VR, an instructor lead practice of VR, and the control, no VR. The sample consisted of 120 medical students in their second year of the program. A descriptive research scope was defined.

The results indicate that VR had a positive impact on learning of the spatial location of anatomical structures. The students found innovation motivating and engaging.

It is necessary that medical educators establish and consolidate standards for the implementation and assessment of VR, in order to guarantee an educational experience that guarantees the achievement of learning objectives of trainees.

References

  1. López, M.V., Hernández, E., Mejía, G., Cerano, J.L. 2019. Factores que facilitan la adopción de tecnología educativa en escuelas de medicina. Educación Médica. 20(1), 3--9. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2017.07.006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilera, N. 2017. Development of spatial skills with virtual reality and augmented reality. IJIDM, 12(1), 133--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kong, X., Nive, L., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Ye, Q., Tang, L., Li, J., Huang, W. 2015. Do Three-dimensional Visualization and Three-dimensional Printing Improve Hepatic Segment Anatomy Teaching?. Journal of Surgical Education. 73(2), 264--270. DOI= 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.10.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Abreu, L.F., Cid, Á.N., Herrera, G., Lara, J.V.M., Laviada, R., Rodríguez, C., et al. 2008. Perfil por Competencias del Médico General Mexicano. México: AMFEM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Arráez-Aybar, L.A., Sánchez-Montesinos, I., Mirapeiz, R.M., Mompeo-Corrededra, B., Sañudo-Tejero, J.R. 2010. Relevance of human anatomy in daily clinical practice. Annals of Anatomy.192(2010), 341--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Older, J. 2004. Anatomy: A must for teaching the next generation, The Surgeon. 2(2), 79--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. McLachlan, J.C., Patten, D. 2006. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Medical Education. 40: 243--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Brenton, H., Hernandez, J., Bello, F., Strutton, P., Purkayastha, S., Firth, T., Darzi, A. 2007. Using multimedia and Web3D to enhance anatomy teaching. Computers & Education. 49(1), 32--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. García Tay, J.A.G., Avendaño Pradel, R., Martínez Anda, J.J. 2014. El uso de la tecnología en la enseñanza de la anatomía en México y su comparación con la enseñanza internacional. Revista de la facultad de medicina de la UNAM. 57(3):31--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hegarty, M., Keehner, M., Cohen, C.A. 2007. Role of Spatial Cognition in Medicine. In: G, Allen (Ed) Applied Spatial Cognition. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffman, H. 1997. Virtual reality: teaching tool of the twenty-first century? Academic Medicine. 72(12):1076--1081.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Choi, D., Dailey-Hebert, A., Estes, J.S. 2016. Emerging Tools and Applications of Virtual Reality in Education. PA: IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sherman, W.R, Craig, A.B. 2003. Understanding virtual reality. New York: The Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang, H.M., Rauch, U., Liaw, S.S. 2010. Investigation learners' attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computer & Education. 55(2010):1171--1182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hoffman, H. 1995. Virtual Reality Meets Medical Education. En K.Morgan, R.M. Satava, H.B. Sieburg, R. Matteus, y J.P. Christensen (Eds) en Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare. California: IOS Press and Ohmsha.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Harman, K.L., Humphrey, G.K., Goodale, M.A. 1999. Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition. Current Biology. 9(1): 1315--1318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. McMillan, J.J., Shumacher, S. 2006. Research in Education. Boston: Pearson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 3D Organon. 2018. Applications for anatomy education. http://www.3dorganon.com/applications/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tuominen, P., Moilanen, T., Passos, M., Puhakainen, E., Heikkinen, V., y Sievers, K. 2016. Exploring the Student's Perceptions to Virtual Reality Environment. http://www.thebox.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Exploring-the-Students_-Perceptions-to-Virtual-Reality-Environment_Tuominen-et-al-2016_revised.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicholson, D.T., Chalk, C., Funnell, W.R., Daniel, S.J. 2006. Can virtual reality improve anatomy education?. Medical Education. 40, 1081--1087.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Codd, A.M., Choudhury, B. 2011.Virtual reality anatomy: Is it comparable with traditional methods in the teaching of human forearm musculoskeletal anatomy?. Anat Sci Ed. 4, 119--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Assessing the Effectiveness of Teaching Anatomy with Virtual Reality

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICETC '19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers
      October 2019
      326 pages
      ISBN:9781450372541
      DOI:10.1145/3369255

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 January 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader