skip to main content
research-article

Multisensor Adaptive Control System for IoT-Empowered Smart Lighting with Oblivious Mobile Sensors

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 December 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The Internet-of-Things (IoT) has engendered a new paradigm of integrated sensing and actuation systems for intelligent monitoring and control of smart homes and buildings. One viable manifestation is that of IoT-empowered smart lighting systems, which rely on the interplay between smart light bulbs (equipped with controllable LED devices and wireless connectivity) and mobile sensors (possibly embedded in users’ wearable devices such as smart watches, spectacles, and gadgets) to provide automated illuminance control functions tailored to users’ preferences (e.g., of brightness, color intensity, or color temperature). Typically, practical deployment of these systems precludes the adoption of sophisticated but costly location-aware sensors capable of accurately mapping out the details of a dynamic operational environment. Instead, cheap oblivious mobile sensors are often utilized, which are plagued with uncertainty in their relative locations to sensors and light bulbs. The imposed volatility, in turn, impedes the design of effective smart lighting systems for uncertain indoor environments with multiple sensors and light bulbs. With this in view, the present article sheds light on the adaptive control algorithms and modeling of such systems. First, a general model formulation of an oblivious multisensor illuminance control problem is proposed, yielding a robust framework agnostic to a dynamic surrounding environment and time-varying background light sources. Under this model, we devise efficient algorithms inducing continuous adaptive lighting control that minimizes energy consumption of light bulbs while meeting users’ preferences. The algorithms are then studied under extensive empirical evaluations in a proof-of-concept smart lighting testbed featuring LIFX programmable bulbs and smartphones (deployed as light sensing units). Lastly, we conclude by discussing the potential improvements in hardware development and highlighting promising directions for future work.

References

  1. Muhammad Aftab, Chien Chen, Chi-Kin Chau, and Talal Rahwan. 2017. Automatic HVAC control with real-time occupancy recognition and simulation-guided model predictive control in low-cost embedded system. Energy and Buildings 154 (2017), 141--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Simon H. A. Begemann, Ariadne D. Tenner, and Gerrit J. Van Den Beld. 1998. Lighting System for Controlling the Color Temperature of Artificial Light under the Influence of the Daylight Level. US Patent 5,721,471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dimitris Bertsimas and Santosh Vempala. 2004. Solving convex programs by random walks. Journal of the ACM 51, 4 (2004), 540--556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Peter Robert Boyce. 2014. Human Factors in Lighting. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Caicedo, S. Li, and A. Pandharipande. 2017. Smart lighting control with workspace and ceiling sensors. Lighting Research 8 Technology 49, 4 (2017), 446--460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Meghan Clark. 2018. Python Library for Accessing LIFX Devices Locally Using the Official LIFX LAN Protocol. Retrieved from https://github.com/mclarkk/lifxlan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. D. Grigoriadis, L. G. Khachiyan, L. Porkolab, and J. Villavicencio. 2001. Approximate max-min resource sharing for structured concave optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization 11, 4 (2001), 1081--1091.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Adam Kalai and Santosh Vempala. 2006. Simulated annealing for convex optimization. Mathematics of Operations Research 31, 2 (2006), 253--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Areg Karapetyan, Sid Chi-Kin Chau, Khaled Elbassioni, Majid Khonji, and Emad Dababseh. 2018. Smart lighting control using oblivious mobile sensors. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Systems for Built Environments (BuildSys’18). ACM, New York, NY, 158--167. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3276774.3276788Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. T. Koroglu and K. M. Passino. 2014. Illumination balancing algorithm for smart lights. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 22, 2 (March 2014), 557--567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. László Lovász and Santosh Vempala. 2004. Hit-and-run from a corner. In ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’04). 310--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. László Lovász and Santosh Vempala. 2006. Fast algorithms for logconcave functions: Sampling, rounding, integration and optimization. In IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’06). 57--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. László Lovász and Santosh Vempala. 2006. Hit-and-run from a corner. SIAM Journal on Computing 35, 4 (2006), 985--1005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Miki, A. Amamiya, and T. Hiroyasu. 2007. Distributed optimal control of lighting based on stochastic hill climbing method with variable neighborhood. In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 1676--1680. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2007.4413957Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Dennis E. Phillips, Rui Tan, Mohammad-Mahdi Moazzami, Guoliang Xing, Jinzhu Chen, and David K. Y. Yau. 2013. Supero: A sensor system for unsupervised residential power usage monitoring. In IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom’13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Vipul Singhvi, Andreas Krause, Carlos Guestrin, James H. Garrett Jr., and H. Scott Matthews. 2005. Intelligent light control using sensor networks. In ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’05).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Noah A. Smith and Roy W. Tromble. 2004. Sampling uniformly from the unit simplex. Johns Hopkins University, Technical Rep 29 (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Niels van de Meugheuvel, Ashish Pandharipande, David Caicedo, and P. P. J. Van Den Hof. 2014. Distributed lighting control with daylight and occupancy adaptation. Energy and Buildings 75 (2014), 321--329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Yao-Jung Wen and A. M. Agogino. 2008. Wireless networked lighting systems for optimizing energy savings and user satisfaction. In IEEE Wireless Hive Networks Conference. 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Y-J. Wen and A. M. Agogino. 2011. Control of wireless-networked lighting in open-plan offices. Lighting Research 8 Technology 43, 2 (2011), 235--248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lun-Wu Yeh, Che-Yen Lu, Chi-Wai Kou, Yu-Chee Tseng, and Chih-Wei Yi. 2010. Autonomous light control by wireless sensor and actuator networks. IEEE Sensors Journal 10, 6 (2010), 1029--1041.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. S. A. R. Zaidi, A. Imran, D. C. McLernon, and M. Ghogho. 2014. Enabling IoT empowered smart lighting solutions: A communication theoretic perspective. In 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW’14). 140--144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNCW.2014.6934875Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Nan Zhao, Matthew Aldrich, Christoph F. Reinhart, and Joseph A. Paradiso. 2015. A multidimensional continuous contextual lighting control system using google glass. In ACM International Conference on Embedded Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments (BuildSys’15). 235--244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multisensor Adaptive Control System for IoT-Empowered Smart Lighting with Oblivious Mobile Sensors

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
                  ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 16, Issue 1
                  February 2020
                  351 pages
                  ISSN:1550-4859
                  EISSN:1550-4867
                  DOI:10.1145/3368392
                  Issue’s Table of Contents

                  Copyright © 2019 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 19 December 2019
                  • Revised: 1 October 2019
                  • Accepted: 1 October 2019
                  • Received: 1 March 2019
                  Published in tosn Volume 16, Issue 1

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article
                  • Research
                  • Refereed

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader

                HTML Format

                View this article in HTML Format .

                View HTML Format