skip to main content
10.1145/3371158.3371208acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescodsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Active Learning for Air Quality Station Location Recommendation

Published:15 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

No abstract available.

References

  1. Kalpana Balakrishnan, Sagnik Dey, Tarun Gupta, RS Dhaliwal, Michael Brauer, Aaron J Cohen, Jeffrey D Stanaway, Gufran Beig, Tushar K Joshi, Ashutosh N Aggarwal, et al. 2019. The impact of air pollution on deaths, disease burden, and life expectancy across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet Planetary Health 3, 1 (2019), e26--e39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Yuyu Chen, Avraham Ebenstein, Michael Greenstone, and Hongbin Li. 2013. Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China's Huai River policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 32 (2013), 12936--12941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Vitor Guizilini and Fabio Ramos. 2015. A Nonparametric Online Model for Air Quality Prediction. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'15). AAAI Press, 651--657. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2887007.2887098Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hsun-Ping Hsieh, Shou-De Lin, and Yu Zheng. 2015. Inferring air quality for station location recommendation based on urban big data. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 437--446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C Arden Pope III, Majid Ezzati, and Douglas W Dockery. 2009. Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 360, 4 (2009), 376--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Burr Settles. 2009. Active Learning Literature Survey. Computer Sciences Technical Report 1648. University of Wisconsin--Madison. http://axon.cs.byu.edu/~martinez/classes/778/Papers/settles.activelearning.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yu Zheng, Furui Liu, and Hsun-Ping Hsieh. 2013. U-air: When urban air quality inference meets big data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 1436--1444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yu Zheng, Xiuwen Yi, Ming Li, Ruiyuan Li, Zhangqing Shan, Eric Chang, and Tianrui Li. 2015. Forecasting Fine-Grained Air Quality Based on Big Data. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2267--2276. https://doi.org/10.1145/2783258.2788573Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CoDS COMAD 2020: Proceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD
    January 2020
    399 pages
    ISBN:9781450377386
    DOI:10.1145/3371158

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 January 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    CoDS COMAD 2020 Paper Acceptance Rate78of275submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate197of680submissions,29%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader