skip to main content
10.1145/3371382.3378327acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Pilot Study for Dynamic Trust Estimation in Human-Robot Collaboration

Published: 01 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

This paper reports on a pilot study for investigating the relation between observable data from users and their trust estimation in Human Robot Collaboration. Two experiments have been set up that contain different situational risks (as one of the pre-requisites for trust investigation). Here we report on one of these. Preliminary results are promising and show a correlation between risk factors, observable behavior and subjective trust estimations.

References

[1]
Peter E Bull. 2016. Posture & gesture . Vol. 16. Elsevier.
[2]
Judith Bütepage and Danica Kragic. 2017. Human-robot collaboration: From psychology to social robotics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.10146 (2017).
[3]
George Charalambous, Sarah Fletcher, and Philip Webb. 2016. The Development of a Scale to Evaulate Trust in Industrial Human-Robot Collaboration. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 8, 2 (2016), 193--209.
[4]
Michael W. Floyd, Michael Drinkwater, and David W. Aha. 2016. Learning Trustworthy Behaviors Using an Inverse Trust Metric .Springer US, Boston, MA, 33--53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4899--7668-0_3
[5]
Marcel Heerink, Ben Kröse, Vanessa Evers, and Bob Wielinga. 2010. Relating conversational expressiveness to social presence and acceptance of an assistive social robot. Virtual reality, Vol. 14, 1 (2010), 77--84.
[6]
Wan-Lin Hu, Kumar Akash, Neera Jain, and Tahira Reid. 2016. Real-Time Sensing of Trust in Human-Machine Interactions. IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol. 49, 32 (2016), 48 -- 53.
[7]
Sarah A. Jessup, Tamera R. Schneider, Gene M. Alarcon, Tyler J. Ryan, and August Capiola. 2019. The Measurement of the Propensity to Trust Automation. In Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Applications and Case Studies, Jessie Y.C. Chen and Gino Fragomeni (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 476--489.
[8]
Gareth R. Jones and Jennifer M. George. 1998. The Experience and Evolution of Trust: Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, 3 (1998), 531--546.
[9]
John D. Lee and Katrina A. See. 2004. Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors, Vol. 46, 1 (2004), 50--80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
[10]
Albert Mehrabian. 1996. Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology, Vol. 14, 4 (1996), 261--292.
[11]
Clifford Nass, BJ Fogg, and Youngme Moon. 1996. Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 45, 6 (1996), 669--678.
[12]
Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of social issues, Vol. 56, 1 (2000), 81--103.
[13]
Clifford Nass, Youngme Moon, Brian J Fogg, Byron Reeves, and Chris Dryer. 1995. Can computer personalities be human personalities?. In Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 228--229.
[14]
Kristin Schaefer. 2013. The perception and measurement of human-robot trust. (2013).
[15]
Astrid Weiss, Regina Bernhaupt, Michael Lankes, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2009. The USUS evaluation framework for human-robot interaction. In AISB2009: proceedings of the symposium on new frontiers in human-robot interaction, Vol. 4. 11--26.
[16]
Anqi Xu and Gregory Dudek. 2015. OPTIMo: Online Probabilistic Trust Inference Model for Asymmetric Human-Robot Collaborations. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction . ACM, New York, NY, USA, 221--228. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696492
[17]
Rosemarie E Yagoda and Douglas J Gillan. 2012a. You want me to trust a ROBOT? The development of a human--robot interaction trust scale. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 4, 3 (2012), 235--248.
[18]
Rosemarie E. Yagoda and Douglas J. Gillan. 2012b. You Want Me to Trust a ROBOT? The Development of a Human--Robot Interaction Trust Scale. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 4, 3 (2012), 235--248.
[19]
James E Young, Richard Hawkins, Ehud Sharlin, and Takeo Igarashi. 2009. Toward acceptable domestic robots: Applying insights from social psychology. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 1, 1 (2009), 95.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)In Gaze We Trust: Comparing Eye Tracking, Self-report, and Physiological Indicators of Dynamic Trust during HRICompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640649(1188-1193)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Safe human-robot collaboration: a systematic review of risk assessment methods with AI integration and standardization considerationsThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology10.1007/s00170-024-13948-3133:9-10(4077-4110)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
  • (2022)Human Factors Considerations and Metrics in Shared Space Human-Robot Collaboration: A Systematic ReviewFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2022.7995229Online publication date: 3-Feb-2022

Index Terms

  1. Pilot Study for Dynamic Trust Estimation in Human-Robot Collaboration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HRI '20: Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
    March 2020
    702 pages
    ISBN:9781450370578
    DOI:10.1145/3371382
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 April 2020

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. human robot collaboration
    2. human robot trust estimation

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Conference

    HRI '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%

    Upcoming Conference

    HRI '25
    ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
    March 4 - 6, 2025
    Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)38
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)In Gaze We Trust: Comparing Eye Tracking, Self-report, and Physiological Indicators of Dynamic Trust during HRICompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640649(1188-1193)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Safe human-robot collaboration: a systematic review of risk assessment methods with AI integration and standardization considerationsThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology10.1007/s00170-024-13948-3133:9-10(4077-4110)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
    • (2022)Human Factors Considerations and Metrics in Shared Space Human-Robot Collaboration: A Systematic ReviewFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2022.7995229Online publication date: 3-Feb-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media