skip to main content
10.1145/3372454.3372485acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdrConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pressure Vessel Design Simulation Using Hybrid Harmony Search Algorithm

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recently the development of optimization algorithm is rapidly increased. Among several optimization algorithms, Harmony Search (HS) has been recently proposed for solving engineering optimization problems. The HS has some weaknesses such as parameters selection and falling in local optima. Many variants proposed to solve these problems. This paper presents successful hybrid algorithms with high performance to solve the pressure vessel design simulation. The hybrid algorithms consist of well-known variants of HS and an opposition-based learning technique. The hybrid algorithm improved the HS exploration and avoiding falling in local optima, which lead the algorithm to provide significant results.

References

  1. Alaa A. Alomoush, A.A.A., et al., Hybrid Harmony Search Algorithm with Grey Wolf Optimizer and Modified Opposition-based Learning. IEEE Access, 2019: p. 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sörensen, K., Metaheuristics--the metaphor exposed. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2015. 22(1): p. 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sörensen, K. and F.W. Glover, Metaheuristics. Encyclopedia of operations research and management science, 2013: p. 960--970.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Salih, S.Q., A.A. Alsewari, and Z.M. Yaseen. Pressure Vessel Design Simulation: Implementing of Multi-Swarm Particle Swarm Optimization. in Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications. 2019. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chiong, R., Nature-inspired algorithms for optimisation. Vol. 193. 2009: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Yang, X.-S., Engineering optimization: an introduction with metaheuristic applications. 2010: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Eiben, A.E. and C.A. Schippers, On evolutionary exploration and exploitation. Fundamenta Informaticae, 1998. 35(1-4): p. 35--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cao, H., et al., Applicability of Subspace Harmony Search Hybrid with Improved Deb Rule in Optimizing Trusses. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2018. 32(4): p. 04018021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Nazari-Heris, M., et al., Large-Scale Combined Heat and Power Economic Dispatch Using a Novel Multi-Player Harmony Search Method. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mikaeil, R., et al., Application of harmony search algorithm to evaluate performance of diamond wire saw. Journal of Mining and Environment, 2019. 10(1): p. 27--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ala'a, A., et al., Comprehensive review of the development of the harmony search algorithm and its applications. IEEE Access, 7 (2019): 14233--14245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Manjarres, D., et al., A survey on applications of the harmony search algorithm. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2013. 26(8): p. 1818--1831.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Alsewari, A., K. Zamli, and B. Al-Kazemi, Generating t-way test suite in the presence of constraints. Journal of Engineering and Technology (JET), 2015. 6(2): p. 52--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, K.S. and Z.W. Geem, A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2005. 194(36): p. 3902--3933.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Geem, Z.W., J.H. Kim, and G. Loganathan, A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. simulation, 2001. 76(2): p. 60--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Das, S., et al., Exploratory power of the harmony search algorithm: analysis and improvements for global numerical optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 2011. 41(1): p. 89--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Abedinpourshotorban, H., et al., A differential-based harmony search algorithm for the optimization of continuous problems. Expert Systems with Applications, 2016. 62: p. 317--332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Storn, R. and K. Price, Differential evolution--a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of global optimization, 1997. 11(4): p. 341--359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Assad, A. and K. Deep, A Hybrid Harmony search and Simulated Annealing algorithm for continuous optimization. Information Sciences, 2018. 450: p. 246--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kirkpatrick, S., C.D. Gelatt, and M.P. Vecchi, Optimization by simulated annealing. science, 1983. 220(4598): p. 671--680.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tizhoosh, H.R. Opposition-based learning: a new scheme for machine intelligence. in Computational intelligence for modelling, control and automation, 2005 and international conference on intelligent agents, web technologies and internet commerce, international conference on. 2005. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Xu, Q., et al., A review of opposition-based learning from 2005 to 2012. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2014. 29: p. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Gao, X., et al., A hybrid optimization method of harmony search and opposition-based learning. Engineering Optimization, 2012. 44(8): p. 895--914.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Xiang, W.-l., et al., An improved global-best harmony search algorithm for faster optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014. 41(13): p. 5788--5803.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Guo, Z., et al., Global harmony search with generalized opposition-based learning. Soft Computing, 2017. 21(8): p. 2129--2137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Pressure Vessel Design Simulation Using Hybrid Harmony Search Algorithm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICBDR '19: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Big Data Research
      November 2019
      192 pages
      ISBN:9781450372015
      DOI:10.1145/3372454

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 January 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader