skip to main content
10.1145/3372938.3373008acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbdiotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Robust Control based on Fuzzy Logic Approach of a Single-Stage Grid-Connected PV System

Published:07 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Due to the large penetration of photovoltaic systems into the grid, improving the power quality and ensuring better grid interconnection became a major issue. Controlling the inverter currents and extracting the PV generator maximum power with intelligent methods are the most important aspects to overcome this issue in the single-stage three-phase grid-connected PV system. For that, we employed the intelligent controllers of fuzzy logic for controlling the inverter currents as well as for maintaining constant the DC-link voltage. Then, we applied a Fuzzy logic algorithm for tracking the PV generator maximum power point and generating simultaneously the reference value of DC-link voltage.

Matlab/Simulink simulations were carried out to evaluate the performances of the intelligent fuzzy logic controller compared to those of classical proportional-integral controller (PI). The simulations results prove that the efficiency of the PV system control strategy using fuzzy logic controllers has been improved in term of reducing the current harmonics as well as the response time of the PV system.

References

  1. Hannan, M. A., Ghani, Z. A., Mohamed, A., & Uddin, M. N. (2015). Real-time testing of a fuzzy-logic-controller-based grid-connected photovoltaic inverter system. IEEE transactions on Industry applications, 51(6), 4775--4784.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. El Filali, A., Laadissi, E. M., & Zazi, M. (2018, October). Tracking maximum power point in photovoltaic systems by calculating the apex of PV characteristic. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Smart Digital Environment (pp. 76--80). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Soufi, Y., Bechouat, M., & Kahla, S. (2017). Fuzzy-PSO controller design for maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic system. International Journal of hydrogen energy, 42(13), 8680--8688.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Atia, Y., Salem, M., Abu-Zaher, M., El-Zohri, E., & Elyousr, F. A. (2019, March). Novel DC voltage controller for single-stage grid connected PV system. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Informatics, Environment, Energy and Applications (pp. 133--138). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Heydari, E., & Varjani, A. Y. (2018, February). Combined modified P&O algorithm with improved direct power control method applied to single-stage three-phase grid-connected PV system. In 2018 9th Annual Power Electronics, Drives Systems and Technologies Conference (PEDSTC) (pp. 347--351). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bahri, H., Aboulfatah, M., Abdelmounim, E., & Adekanle, O. S. (2017, November). Three-Phase Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System with Active and Reactive Power Control using Backstepping Method. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing and Wireless Communication Systems (p. 36). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sarhan, M. A., Ding, M., Chen, X., & Wu, M. (2017, December). Performance Study of Neural Network and ANFIS Based MPPT Methods For Grid Connected PV System. In Proceedings of the 2017 VI International Conference on Network, Communication and Computing (pp. 227--234). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Pereira, M., de la Peña, D. M., & Limón, D. (2017). Robust economic model predictive control of a community microgrid. Renewable Energy, 100, 3--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Wang, X., Li, Q., Chen, W., Wang, W., Pu, Y., & Yu, J. (2019). Parallel interaction influence of single-stage photovoltaic grid-connected/hydrogen production multi-inverter system based on modal analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(11), 5143--5152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Patra, S., Kishor, N., Mohanty, S. R., & Ray, P. K. (2016). Power quality assessment in 3--Φ grid connected PV system with single and dual stage circuits. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 75, 275--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dhar, S., & Dash, P. K. (2016). A new backstepping finite time sliding mode control of grid connected PV system using multivariable dynamic VSC model. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 82, 314--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Özbay, H., Öncü, S., & Kesler, M. (2017). SMC-DPC based active and reactive power control of grid-tied three phase inverter for PV systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(28), 17713--17722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nassar-Eddine, I., Obbadi, A., Et-Torabi, & et al. (2019, July). A new Fuzzy Logic architecture to control the DC-bus voltage in grid connected photovoltaic system. In 2019 International Conference of Computer Science and Renewable Energies (ICCSRE) (pp. 1--7). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Fannakh, M., Elhafyani, M. L., & Zouggar, S. (2018, December). Fuzzy Logic Approach to Improve the Performances of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Power System. In 2018 6th International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC) (pp. 1--6). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Nassar-Eddine, I., Obbadi, A., Errami, Y., & Agunaou, M. (2016). Parameter estimation of photovoltaic modules using iterative method and the Lambert W function: A comparative study. Energy Conversion and Management, 119, 37--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Et-Torabi, K., Nassar-eddine, I., Obbadi, A., Errami, Y., Rmaily, R., Sahnoun, S., & Agunaou, M. (2017). Parameters estimation of the single and double diode photovoltaic models using a Gauss--Seidel algorithm and analytical method: A comparative study. Energy Conversion and Management, 148, 1041--1054.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Nassar-eddine, I., Et-torabi, K., Rmaily, R., Obbadi, A., Errami, Y., Sahnoun, S., & Agunaou, M. (2018, December). Parameter Identification of Multicrystalline Modules Using Two Methods and Five Improved Mathematical Models. In 2018 6th International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC) (pp. 1--6). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Errami Y, Obbadi A, Sahnoun S, Benhmida M, Ouassaid M, Maaroufi M. Design of a nonlinear backstepping control strategy of grid interconnected wind power system based PMSG. InAIP Conference Proceedings 2016 Jul 25 (Vol. 1758, No. 1, p. 030053).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    BDIoT '19: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things
    October 2019
    476 pages
    ISBN:9781450372404
    DOI:10.1145/3372938

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 January 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    BDIoT '19 Paper Acceptance Rate75of136submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate75of136submissions,55%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader