skip to main content
10.1145/3373509.3373543acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Cutting Tools based on Deep Adversarial Transfer Learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Condition-based maintenance and the prediction of the remaining useful life (RUL) of cutting tools are of crucial importance to reduce unexpected downtime and ensure quality. Our paper proposes a deep adversarial transfer learning based approach for RUL prediction of cutting tools. It mainly includes three parts: source domain pre-training, adversarial domain adaption and target domain prediction. Firstly, we pre-train a source long short-term memory (LSTM) network and a nonlinear regression model by using the labeled source cutting tool examples. Secondly, we perform adversarial domain adaption by learning a target LSTM model that minimize the distance between the source domain and target domain under their respective mapping, thus making it impossible for the discriminator to distinguish between the target and source cutting tools. Finally, the RUL of target cutting tools can be predicted. Our proposed method is applied to the data obtained the data obtained from a turbine factory's slotting cutter machining process. The result shows that the effectiveness and practicability of our proposed method.

References

  1. Javed K, Gouriveau R, Zerhouni N. 2017. State of the art and taxonomy of prognostics approaches, trends of prognostics applications and open issues towards maturity at different technology readiness levels. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 94, (March 2017), 214--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Benkedjouh T, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N, Rechak S. 2013. Health assessment and life prediction of cutting tools based on support vector regression. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 26 (April 2013), 213--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Drouillet C, Karandikar J, Nath C, Journeaux A-C, El Mansori M, Kurfess T. 2016. Tool life predictions in milling using spindle power with the neural network technique. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 22(March 2016), 161--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tobon-Mejia DA, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N. 2012. CNC machine tool's wear diagnostic and prognostic by using dynamic Bayesian networks. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.28 (December 2012), 167--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Z, Li Y, Xia T, Pan E. 2017. Hidden Markov model with auto-correlated observations for remaining useful life prediction and optimal maintenance policy. Reliability Engineering & System Safety.28 (September 2017), 19--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jia F, Lei Y, Lin J, Zhou X, Lu N. 2016. Deep neural networks: A promising tool for fault characteristic mining and intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery with massive data. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.72--73(November 2015), 303--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Shi C, Panoutsos G, Luo B, Liu H, Li B, Lin X.2019. Using Multiple-Feature-Spaces-Based Deep Learning for Tool Condition Monitoring in Ultraprecision Manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 66, 5(June 2018), 3794--803.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Young T, Hazarika D, Poria S, Cambria E. Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing. IEEE Computational intelligenCe magazine.13, 3 (August 2018), 55--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. 2015. Deep learning. Nature.521, 7553 (May 2015), 436--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Zheng S, Ristovski K, Farahat A, Gupta C.2017. Long short-term memory network for remaining useful life estimation. IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (Dallas, TX, USA, June 19--21, 2017). ICPHM'17, 88--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Zhang J.2017. Particle Learning and Gated Recurrent Neural Network for Online Tool Wear Diagnosis and Prognosis. 2017. North Carolina State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhao R, Yan R, Wang J, Mao K.2017. Learning to Monitor Machine Health with Convolutional Bi-Directional LSTM Networks. Sensors. 17, 2(January 2017), 273--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen Y, Jin Y, Jiri G.2018. Predicting tool wear with multi-sensor data using deep belief networks. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 99 (August 2018), 1917--1926.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gouarir A, Martínez-Arellano G, Terrazas G, Benardos P, Ratchev S.2018. In-Process Tool Wear Prediction System Based on Machine Learning Techniques and Force Analysis. Procedia CIRP. 77 (June 2018), 501--504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pan S. J., Yang Q. 2010. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering. 22 (October 2010), 1345--1359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Wan G, Yu A, Yu X, Liu B. 2018. Deep convolutional recurrent neural network with transfer learning for hyperspectral image classification. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing. 12 (June 2018), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bislick L. P., Weir P. C., Spencer K, Kendall D, Yorkston KM. 2012. Do principles of motor learning enhance retention and transfer of speech skills? A systematic review. Aphasiology. 26 (May 2012), 709--728.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Meng J, Lin H, Li Y. 2011. Knowledge transfer based on feature representation mapping for text classification. Expert Systems with Applications. 38 (2011), 10562--10567. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Wen L, Gao L, Li X. 2019. A New Deep Transfer Learning Based on Sparse Auto-Encoder for Fault Diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. 49, 1 (January 2019)136--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Bengio Y, Simard P, Frasconi P.1994. Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE transactions on neural networks.5, 2 (March 1994), 157--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hochreiter S, Bengio Y, Frasconi P, Schmidhuber J. 2001. Gradient flow in recurrent nets: the difficulty of learning long-term dependencies. A field guide to dynamical recurrent neural networks. IEEE Press; 2001. University of FlorenceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lipton ZC, Berkowitz J, Elkan C.2015. A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:150600019. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu Y, Hu X, Zhang W.2019. Remaining useful life prediction based on health index similarity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 185 (February 2019), 502--510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu Y, Yuan M, Dong S, Lin L, Liu Y. 2018. Remaining useful life estimation of engineered systems using vanilla LSTM neural networks. Neurocomputing. 275 (May 2018), 167--179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Cutting Tools based on Deep Adversarial Transfer Learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICCPR '19: Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Computing and Pattern Recognition
        October 2019
        522 pages
        ISBN:9781450376570
        DOI:10.1145/3373509

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 March 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader