Ather Sharif
Jacob O. Wobbrock
ABSTRACT
For over six decades, Fitts’s law (1954) has been utilized by researchers to quantify human pointing performance in terms of “throughput,” a combined speed-accuracy measure of aimed movement efficiency. Throughput measurements are commonly used to evaluate pointing techniques and devices, helping to inform software and hardware developments. Although Fitts’s law has been used extensively in HCI and beyond, its test-retest reliability, both in terms of throughput and model fit, from one session to the next, is still unexplored. Additionally, despite the fact that prior work has shown that Fitts’s law provides good model fits, with Pearson correlation coefficients commonly at r=.90 or above, the model fitness of Fitts’s law has not been thoroughly investigated for people who exhibit limited fine motor function in their dominant hand. To fill these gaps, we conducted a study with 21 participants with limited fine motor function and 34 participants without such limitations. Each participant performed a classic reciprocal pointing task comprising vertical ribbons in a 1-D layout in two sessions, which were at least four hours and at most 48 hours apart. Our findings indicate that the throughput values between the two sessions were statistically significantly different, both for people with and without limited fine motor function, suggesting that Fitts’s law provides low test-retest reliability. Importantly, the test-retest reliability of Fitts’s throughput metric was 4.7% lower for people with limited fine motor function. Additionally, we found that the model fitness of Fitts’s law as measured by Pearson correlation coefficient, r, was .89 (SD=0.08) for people without limited fine motor function, and .81 (SD=0.09) for people with limited fine motor function. Taken together, these results indicate that Fitts’s law should be used with caution and, if possible, over multiple sessions, especially when used in assistive technology evaluations.
- Theodore W Anderson and Donald A Darling. 1954. A test of goodness of fit. Journal of the American statistical association 49, 268(1954), 765–769.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Anil Ufuk Batmaz, Aunnoy K Mutasim, Morteza Malekmakan, Elham Sadr, and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2020. Touch the wall: Comparison of virtual and augmented reality with conventional 2D screen eye-hand coordination training systems. In The IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (IEEE VR).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Donald A Berry. 1987. Logarithmic transformations in ANOVA. Biometrics (1987), 439–456.Google Scholar
- M Bertucco, P Cesari, and ML Latash. 2013. Fitts’ Law in early postural adjustments. Neuroscience 231(2013), 61–69.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barbara Bied Sperling and Thomas S Tullis. 1988. Are you a better” mouser” or” trackballer”? A comparison of cursor-positioning performance. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 19, 3 (1988), 77–81.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Renaud Blanch and Michael Ortega. 2011. Benchmarking pointing techniques with distractors: adding a density factor to Fitts’ pointing paradigm. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1629–1638.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reinoud J Bootsma, Laure Fernandez, and Denis Mottet. 2004. Behind Fitts’ law: kinematic patterns in goal-directed movements. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 6 (2004), 811–821.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pedro E Bravo, Miriam LeGare, Albert M Cook, and Susan Hussey. 1993. A study of the application of Fitts’ law to selected cerebral palsied adults. Perceptual and motor skills 77, 3_suppl (1993), 1107–1117.Google Scholar
- George Erich Brogmus. 1991. Effects of age and sex on speed and accuracy of hand movements: And the refinements they suggest for Fitts’ Law. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 35. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 208–212.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jesse Burstyn, Juan Pablo Carrascal, and Roel Vertegaal. 2016. Fitts’ Law and the Effects of Input Mapping and Stiffness on Flexible Display Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3649–3658.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stuart K Card, William K English, and Betty J Burr. 1978. Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21, 8 (1978), 601–613.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Logan D Clark, Aakash B Bhagat, and Sara L Riggs. 2020. Extending Fitts’ law in three-dimensional virtual environments with current low-cost virtual reality technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 139 (2020), 102413.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andy Cockburn and Andrew Firth. 2004. Improving the acquisition of small targets. In People and Computers XVII—Designing for Society. Springer, 181–196.Google Scholar
- Jacob Cohen. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the social sciences. (1988).Google Scholar
- ERFW Crossman. 1957. The speed and accuracy of simple hand movements. The nature and acquisition of industrial skills (1957).Google Scholar
- David Jud Dixon. 1985. Underwater movement and Fitts’ law. Ph.D. Dissertation. Texas Tech University.Google Scholar
- Paul M Fitts. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.Journal of experimental psychology 47, 6 (1954), 381.Google Scholar
- Paul M Fitts and James R Peterson. 1964. Information capacity of discrete motor responses.Journal of experimental psychology 67, 2 (1964), 103.Google Scholar
- Tamar Flash and Neville Hogan. 1985. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of neuroscience 5, 7 (1985), 1688–1703.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brigitte N Frederick. 1999. Fixed-, Random-, and Mixed-Effects ANOVA Models: A User-Friendly Guide for Increasing the Generalizability of ANOVA Results.(1999).Google Scholar
- Naomi Friedlander, Kevin Schlueter, and Marilyn Mantei. 1998. Bullseye! when Fitts’ law doesn’t fit. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 257–264.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krzysztof Z Gajos, Jacob O Wobbrock, and Daniel S Weld. 2007. Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users’ motor and vision capabilities. In Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 231–240.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krzysztof Z Gajos, Jacob O Wobbrock, and Daniel S Weld. 2008. Improving the performance of motor-impaired users with automatically-generated, ability-based interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1257–1266.Google ScholarDigital Library
- AR Gilmour, RD Anderson, and AL Rae. 1985. The analysis of binomial data by a generalized linear mixed model. Biometrika 72, 3 (1985), 593–599.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julien Gori, Olivier Rioul, Yves Guiard, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2018. The Perils of Confounding Factors: How Fitts’ Law Experiments can Lead to False Conclusions. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–10.Google Scholar
- Yves Guiard. 2009. The problem of consistency in the design of Fitts’ law experiments: Consider either target distance and width or movement form and scale. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1809–1818.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alison Gump, Miriam Legare, and Deborah L Hunt. 2002. Application of Fitts’ law to individuals with cerebral palsy. Perceptual and motor skills 94, 3 (2002), 883–895.Google Scholar
- Walton M Hancock, Gary Langolf, and Daniel O Clark. 1973. Development of standard data for stereoscopic microscope work. AIIE Transactions 5, 2 (1973), 113–118.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susumu Harada, Jacob O Wobbrock, Jonathan Malkin, Jeff A Bilmes, and James A Landay. 2009. Longitudinal study of people learning to use continuous voice-based cursor control. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 347–356.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morten Hertzum and Kasper Hornbæk. 2010. How age affects pointing with mouse and touchpad: A comparison of young, adult, and elderly users. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 26, 7(2010), 703–734.Google Scholar
- MH Hoyle. 1973. Transformations: An introduction and a bibliography. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique (1973), 203–223.Google Scholar
- Gary W Hrezo. 2001. Measuring pointing times of a non-visual haptic interface. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 45. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 654–656.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ISO ISO. [n.d.]. 9241-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices (FDIS-Final Draft International Standard), 2000. International Organization for Standardization ([n. d.]).Google Scholar
- Poika Isokoski and Roope Raisamo. 2002. Speed-accuracy measures in a population of six mice. In Proc. APCHI2002: 5th Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction. Science Press, 765–777.Google Scholar
- Robert Kerr. 1973. Movement time in an underwater environment. Journal of Motor Behavior 5, 3 (1973), 175–178.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caroline J Ketcham, Rachael D Seidler, Arend WA Van Gemmert, and George E Stelmach. 2002. Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 57, 1 (2002), P54–P64.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexander Kulik, André Kunert, and Bernd Froehlich. 2020. On Motor Performance in Virtual 3D Object Manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 5(2020), 2041–2050.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gary Langolf and Walton M Hancock. 1975. Human performance times in microscope work. AIIE Transactions 7, 2 (1975), 110–117.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eckhard Limpert, Werner A Stahel, and Markus Abbt. 2001. Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues: on the charms of statistics, and how mechanical models resembling gambling machines offer a link to a handy way to characterize log-normal distributions, which can provide deeper insight into variability and probability—normal or log-normal: that is the question. BioScience 51, 5 (2001), 341–352.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ramon C Littell, PR Henry, and Clarence B Ammerman. 1998. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of animal science 76, 4 (1998), 1216–1231.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julian Looser, Andy Cockburn, Joshua Savage, and N Christchurch. 2005. On the validity of using First-Person Shooters for Fitts’ law studies. People and Computers XIX 2 (2005), 33–36.Google Scholar
- I Scott MacKenzie. 1989. A note on the information-theoretic basis for Fitts’ law. Journal of motor behavior 21, 3 (1989), 323–330.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I Scott MacKenzie. 1992. Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-computer interaction 7, 1 (1992), 91–139.Google ScholarDigital Library
- I Scott MacKenzie and William Buxton. 1992. Extending Fitts’ law to two-dimensional tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 219–226.Google ScholarDigital Library
- I Scott MacKenzie and Poika Isokoski. 2008. Fitts’ throughput and the speed-accuracy tradeoff. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1633–1636.Google ScholarDigital Library
- I Scott MacKenzie and Shaidah Jusoh. 2001. An evaluation of two input devices for remote pointing. In IFIP International Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 235–250.Google ScholarDigital Library
- I Scott MacKenzie, Tatu Kauppinen, and Miika Silfverberg. 2001. Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 9–16.Google ScholarDigital Library
- I Scott MacKenzie and Aleks Oniszczak. 1998. A comparison of three selection techniques for touchpads. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 336–343.Google ScholarDigital Library
- I Scott MacKenzie and Shawn X Zhang. 1999. The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 25–31.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ji-Young Oh and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2002. Laser pointers as collaborative pointing devices. In Graphics Interface, Vol. 2002. 141–149.Google Scholar
- Kyudong Park, Dohyeon Kim, and Sung H Han. 2020. Usability of the size, spacing, and operation method of virtual buttons with virtual hand on head-mounted displays. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 76 (2020), 102939.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Réjean Plamondon and Adel M Alimi. 1997. Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements. Behavioral and brain sciences 20, 2 (1997), 279–303.Google Scholar
- Paul C Price, Rajiv Jhangiani, I-Chant A Chiang, 2015. Research methods in psychology. BCCampus.Google Scholar
- Raghavendra S Rao, Rami Seliktar, and Tariq Rahman. 2000. Evaluation of an isometric and a position joystick in a target acquisition task for individuals with cerebral palsy. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 8, 1(2000), 118–125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maria Francesca Roig-Maimó, I Scott MacKenzie, Cristina Manresa-Yee, and Javier Varona. 2018. Head-tracking interfaces on mobile devices: Evaluation using Fitts’ law and a new multi-directional corner task for small displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 112 (2018), 1–15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael W Smith, Joseph Sharit, and Sara J Czaja. 1999. Aging, motor control, and the performance of computer mouse tasks. Human factors 41, 3 (1999), 389–396.Google Scholar
- BCM Smits-Engelsman, EAA Rameckers, and Jaak Duysens. 2007. Children with congenital spastic hemiplegia obey Fitts’ Law in a visually guided tapping task. Experimental Brain Research 177, 4 (2007), 431–439.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R William Soukoreff and I Scott MacKenzie. 2004. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts’ law research in HCI. International journal of human-computer studies 61, 6 (2004), 751–789.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christine Sutter and Martina Ziefle. 2004. Psychomotor efficiency in users of notebook input devices: Confirmation and restrictions of Fitts’ law as an evaluative tool for user-friendly design. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 48. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 773–777.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zachary C Thumser, Andrew B Slifkin, Dylan T Beckler, and Paul D Marasco. 2018. Fitts’ law in the control of isometric grip force with naturalistic targets. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 560.Google Scholar
- Paolo Viviani and Tamar Flash. 1995. Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, 1(1995), 32.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Neff Walker, Jeff Millians, and Aileen Worden. 1996. Mouse accelerations and performance of older computer users. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 40. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 151–154.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Neff Walker, David A Philbin, and Arthur D Fisk. 1997. Age-related differences in movement control: Adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 52, 1 (1997), P40–P53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph P Weir. 2005. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 19, 1 (2005), 231–240.Google Scholar
- Alan Traviss Welford. 1968. Fundamentals of skill.(1968).Google Scholar
- Jacob O Wobbrock, James Fogarty, Shih-Yen Liu, Shunichi Kimuro, and Susumu Harada. 2009. The angle mouse: target-agnostic dynamic gain adjustment based on angular deviation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1401–1410.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob O Wobbrock and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2007. A comparison of area pointing and goal crossing for people with and without motor impairments. In Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. 3–10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob O Wobbrock, Kristen Shinohara, and Alex Jansen. 2011. The effects of task dimensionality, endpoint deviation, throughput calculation, and experiment design on pointing measures and models. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1639–1648.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shumin Zhai. 2004. Characterizing computer input with Fitts’ law parameters—the information and non-information aspects of pointing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 6 (2004), 791–809.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The Reliability of Fitts’s Law as a Movement Model for People with and without Limited Fine Motor Function
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Estimation of psychomotor delay from the Fitts’ law coefficients
An intrinsic property of human motor behavior is a trade-off between speed and accuracy. This is classically described by Fitts’ law, a model derived by assuming that the human body has a limited capacity to transmit information in organizing motor ...
Comments