Leah Findlater
Lotus Zhang
ABSTRACT
Age and motor ability are well-known to impact input performance. Past work examining these factors, however, has tended to focus on samples of 20-40 participants and has binned participants into a small set of age groups (e.g., “younger” vs. “older”). To foster a more nuanced understanding of how age and motor ability impact input performance, this short paper contributes: (1) a dataset from a large-scale study that captures input performance with a mouse and/or touchscreen from over 700 participants, as well as (2) summary analysis of a subset of 318 participants who range in age from 18 to 83 years old and of whom 53% reported a motor impairment. The analysis demonstrates the continuous relationship between age and input performance for users with and without motor impairments, but also illustrates that knowing a user's age and self-reported motor ability should not lead to assumptions about their input performance. The dataset, which contains mouse and touchscreen input traces, should allow for further exploration by other researchers.
- Chaparro, A., Bohan, M., Fernandez, J., Choi, S.D. and Kattel, B. 1999. The impact of age on computer input device use: Psychophysical and physiological measures. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 24, (1999), 503–513.Google Scholar
- Czaja, S.J., Boot, W.R., Charness, N. and Rogers, W.A. 2019. Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC press.Google Scholar
- Devore, J.L. 2015. Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Findlater, L., Froehlich, J.E., Fattal, K., Wobbrock, J.O. and Dastyar, T. 2013. Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13) (New York, New York, USA, 2013), 343–346.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Findlater, L., Moffatt, K., Froehlich, J.E., Malu, M. and Zhang, J. 2017. Comparing Touchscreen and Mouse Input Performance by People With and Without Upper Body Motor Impairments. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2017), 6056–6061.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Findlater, L., Zhang, J., Froehlich, J.E. and Moffatt, K. 2017. Differences in Crowdsourced vs. Lab-based Mobile and Desktop Input Performance Data. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2017), 6813–6824.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Franz, R.L., Wobbrock, J.O., Cheng, Y. and Findlater, L. 2019. Perception and Adoption of Mobile Accessibility Features by Older Adults Experiencing Ability Changes. The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (2019), 267–278.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hertzum, M. and Hornbæk, K. 2010. How Age Affects Pointing With Mouse and Touchpad: A Comparison of Young, Adult, and Elderly Users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 26, 7 (Jun. 2010), 703–734. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2010.487198.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hourcade, J. and Berkel, T. 2008. Simple pen interaction performance of young and older adults using handheld computers. Interacting with Computers. 20, 1 (Jan. 2008), 166–183. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2007.10.002.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hwang, F., Hollinworth, N. and Williams, N. 2013. Effects of Target Expansion on Selection Performance in Older Computer Users. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS). 5, 1 (2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2514848.Google ScholarDigital Library
- International Organization for Standardization 2002. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Requirements for non-keyboard input devices.Google Scholar
- Keates, S. and Trewin, S. 2005. Effect of age and Parkinson's disease on cursor positioning using a mouse. Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’05) (New York, New York, USA, 2005), 68–75.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ketcham, C.J., Seidler, R.D., Van Gemmert, A.W.A. and Stelmach, G.E. 2002. Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. Journal of Gerontology. 57, 1 (Jan. 2002), 54–64.Google Scholar
- Li, E.K., Lee, S., Patel, S.S. and Sereno, A.B. 2018. Age-dependent Performance on Pro-point and Anti-point Tasks. Frontiers in psychology. 9, (2018), 2519.Google Scholar
- MacKenzie, I.S. and Isokoski, P. 2008. Fitts’ throughput and the speed-accuracy tradeoff. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08) (New York, New York, USA, 2008), 1633–1636.Google ScholarDigital Library
- MacKenzie, I.S., Sellen, A. and Buxton, W.A.S. 1991. A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasks. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (1991), 161–166.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Moffatt, K. and Mcgrenere, J. 2007. Slipping and Drifting: Using Older Users to Uncover Pen-based Target Acquisition Difficulties. (2007), 11–18.Google Scholar
- Motti, L.G., Vigouroux, N. and Gorce, P. 2013. Interaction techniques for older adults using touchscreen devices: a literature review. Proceedings of the 25th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine (2013), 125–134.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicolau, H., Guerreiro, T., Jorge, J. and Gonçalves, D. 2014. Mobile touchscreen user interfaces: Bridging the gap between motor-impaired and able-bodied users. Universal Access in the Information Society. 13, (2014), 303–313. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0320-5.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Riviere, C.N. and Thakor, N. V 1996. Effects of age and disability on tracking tasks with a computer mouse: accuracy and linearity. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 33, 1 (1996), 6–15.Google Scholar
- Salivia, G. and Hourcade, J.P. 2013. PointAssist: assisting Iindividuals with motor impairments. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13) (2013), 1213–1222.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, M.W., Sharit, J. and Czaja, S.J. 1999. Aging, motor control, and the performance of computer mouse tasks. Human Factors. 41, 3 (Sep. 1999), 389–396. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779611102.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smith, M.W., Sharit, J. and Czaja, S.J. 1999. Aging, Motor Control, and the Performance of Computer Mouse Tasks. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 41, 3 (Sep. 1999), 389–396. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779611102.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Soukoreff, R.W. and MacKenzie, I.S. 2004. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts’ law research in HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 61, 6 (Dec. 2004), 751–789. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.001.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sultana, A. and Moffatt, K. 2019. Effects of Aging on Small Target Selection with Touch Input. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS). 12, 1 (2019), 1–35.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Teeken, J.C., Adam, J.J., Paas, F.G.W.C., Van Boxtel, M.P.J., Houx, P.J. and Jolles, J. 1996. Effects of age and gender on discrete and reciprocal aiming movements. Psychology and aging. 11, 2 (1996), 195.Google Scholar
- Vines, J., Pritchard, G., Wright, P., Olivier, P. and Brittain, K. 2015. An age-old problem: Examining the discourses of ageing in HCI and strategies for future research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI). 22, 1 (2015), 1–27.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wacharamanotham, C., Hurtmanns, J., Mertens, A., Kronenbuerger, M., Schlick, C. and Borchers, J. 2011. Evaluating Swabbing: a touchscreen input method for elderly users with tremor. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11) (2011), 623–626.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walker, N., Philbin, D.A. and Fisk, A.D. 1997. Age-related differences in movement control: adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. Journal of Gerontology. 52B, 1 (Jan. 1997), 40–52.Google Scholar
- Wobbrock, J.O. and Gajos, K.Z. 2008. Goal crossing with mice and trackballs for people with motor impairments: Performance, submovements, and design directions. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS). 1, 1 (2008), 1–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1361203.1361207.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Input Accessibility: A Large Dataset and Summary Analysis of Age, Motor Ability and Input Performance
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Comparing Touchscreen and Mouse Input Performance by People With and Without Upper Body Motor Impairments
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsControlled studies of touchscreen input performance for users with upper body motor impairments remain relatively sparse. To address this gap, we present a controlled lab study of mouse vs. touchscreen performance with 32 participants (16 with upper ...
Trends in the Decline in Gait and Motor Ability of Older Adults: A Case Study Based on SHARE Data
Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Social Media, Games and Assistive EnvironmentsAbstractThis study analyzed data from the SHARE study to compare the gait speed of older adults in European countries and China and to explore the association of gait speed with other physical abilities. Given that the motor development of children ...
Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input
CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDespite the apparent popularity of touchscreens for older adults, little is known about the psychomotor performance of these devices. We compared performance between older adults and younger adults on four desktop and touchscreen tasks: pointing, ...
Comments