skip to main content
10.1145/3373625.3418020acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Exploring Low-Cost Materials to Make Pattern-Based Lock-Screens Accessible for Users with Visual Impairments or Deafblindness

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, the wide majority of Europeans uses smartphones. However, touch displays are still not accessible by everyone. Individuals with deafblindness, for example, often face difficulties in accessing vision-based touchscreens. Moreover, they typically have few financial resources which increases the need for customizable, low-cost assistive devices. In this work-in-progress, we present four prototypes made from low-cost, every-day materials, that make modern pattern lock mechanisms more accessible to individuals with vision impairments or even with deafblindness. Two out of four prototypes turned out to be functional tactile overlays for accessing digital 4-by-4 grids that are regularly used to encode dynamic dot patterns. In future work, we will conduct a user study investigating whether these two prototypes can make dot-based pattern lock mechanisms more accessible for individuals with visual impairments or deafblindness.

References

  1. Daniella Briotto Faustino and Audrey Girouard. 2018. Bend Passwords on BendyPass: A User Authentication Method for People with Vision Impairment. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ACM, Galway Ireland, 435–437. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3241032Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Daniella Briotto Faustino and Audrey Girouard. 2018. Understanding Authentication Method Use on Mobile Devices by People with Vision Impairment. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ACM, Galway Ireland, 217–228. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236342Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sándor Darányi, Nasrine Olson, Marina Riga, Efstratios Kontopoulos, and Ioannis Kompatsiaris. 2019. Static and Dynamic Haptograms to Communicate Semantic Content - Towards Enabling Face-to-Face Communication for People with Deafblindness. In SEMAPRO 2019, Porto, Prtugal, 16–20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mattias Ehn, Moa Wahlqvist, Berth Danermark, Örjan Dahlström, and Claes Möller. Health, work, social trust, and financial situation in persons with Usher syndrome type 1. Work Read. Mass 60, 2 , 209–220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182731Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Shaun K. Kane, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2013. Touchplates: low-cost tactile overlays for visually impaired touch screen users. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’13), Association for Computing Machinery, Bellevue, Washington, 1–8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2513383.2513442Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nic Lane and Xia Zhou. THE ANATOMY OF SMARTPHONE UNLOCKING. 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Arthur Theil, Lea Buchweitz, Mauricio Fuentes, and Oliver Korn. 2020. Co-Designing Assistive Tools to Support Social Interactions by Individuals Living with Deafblindness. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’ 20 Companion), Association for Computing Machinery, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 79–83. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395869Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Guixin Ye, Zhanyong Tang, Dingyi Fang, Xiaojiang Chen, Kwang In Kim, Ben Taylor, and Zheng Wang. 2017. Cracking Android Pattern Lock in Five Attempts. In Proceedings 2017 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, Internet Society, San Diego, CA. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2017.23130Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Xiaoyi Zhang, Tracy Tran, Yuqian Sun, Ian Culhane, Shobhit Jain, James Fogarty, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2018. Interactiles: 3D Printed Tactile Interfaces to Enhance Mobile Touchscreen Accessibility. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, Galway, Ireland, 131–142. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236349Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. The Mobile Economy Europe 2018. The Mobile Economy. Retrieved June 25, 2020 from https://www.gsma.com/mobileeconomy/europe/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Low-Cost Materials to Make Pattern-Based Lock-Screens Accessible for Users with Visual Impairments or Deafblindness
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASSETS '20: Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
        October 2020
        764 pages
        ISBN:9781450371032
        DOI:10.1145/3373625

        Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 October 2020

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        ASSETS '20 Paper Acceptance Rate46of167submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format