Abstract
Pedestrian motion modeling in mixed traffic scenarios is crucial to the development of autonomous systems in transportation related applications. This work investigated how pedestrian motion is affected by surrounding pedestrians and vehicles, i.e., vehicle-pedestrian interaction. A social force based pedestrian motion model was proposed, in which the effect of surrounding pedestrians was improved and the effect of vehicles was newly designed. Variable constraints dependent on vehicle influence as well as nearby pedestrian density were imposed on the velocity and acceleration of the pedestrian motion. This work focuses on fundamental patterns of multi-pedestrian interaction with a low speed vehicle (front, back, and lateral interaction in open space). In other words, the application of the model is not restricted to specific scenarios such as crosswalks. Parameters of the proposed model were calibrated by the genetic algorithm (GA) based on trajectory data of the same vehicle-pedestrian interaction patterns from controlled experiments. The proposed model is able to simulate complex self-designed vehicle-pedestrian interaction scenarios. The effectiveness of the proposed model was validated by comparing the simulated trajectories with ground truth trajectories under the same initial conditions, and by evaluating the pedestrian behavior of avoiding vehicle in the simulation of self-designed scenarios.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, A Social Force Based Pedestrian Motion Model Considering Multi-Pedestrian Interaction with a Vehicle
- Alexandre Alahi, Kratarth Goel, Vignesh Ramanathan, Alexandre Robicquet, Li Fei-Fei, and Silvio Savarese. 2016. Social LSTM: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 961--971.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gianluca Antonini, Michel Bierlaire, and Mats Weber. 2006. Discrete choice models of pedestrian walking behavior. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40, 8 (2006), 667--687.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bani Anvari, Michael G. H. Bell, Aruna Sivakumar, and Washington Y. Ochieng. 2015. Modelling shared space users via rule-based social force model. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 51 (2015), 83--103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gabriele Bernardini, Enrico Quagliarini, and D’Orazio. 2016. Towards creating a combined database for earthquake pedestrians’ evacuation models. Safety Science 82 (2016), 77--94.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Winnie Daamen and Serge Hoogendoorn. 2012. Calibration of pedestrian simulation model for emergency doors by pedestrian type. Transportation Research Record 2316, 1 (2012), 69--75.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rayan El Helou. 2016. Agent-Based Modelling of Pedestrian Microscopic Interactions. Master’s Thesis. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
- Claudio Feliciani, Luca Crociani, Andrea Gorrini, Giuseppe Vizzari, Stefania Bandini, and Katsuhiro Nishinari. 2017. A simulation model for non-signalized pedestrian crosswalks based on evidence from on field observation. Intelligenza Artificiale 11, 2 (2017), 117--138.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrea Gorrini, Luca Crociani, Giuseppe Vizzari, and Stefania Bandini. 2018. Observation results on pedestrian-vehicle interactions at non-signalized intersections towards simulation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 59 (2018), 269--285.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Agrim Gupta, Justin Johnson, Li Fei-Fei, Silvio Savarese, and Alexandre Alahi. 2018. Social GAN: Socially acceptable trajectories with generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2255--2264.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shlomi Hacohen, Nir Shvalb, and Shraga Shoval. 2018. Dynamic model for pedestrian crossing in congested traffic based on probabilistic navigation function. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 86 (2018), 78--96.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dirk Helbing, Illés Farkas, and Tamas Vicsek. 2000. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407, 6803 (2000), 487.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dirk Helbing and Peter Molnar. 1995. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E 51, 5 (1995), 4282.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Serge P. Hoogendoorn and Piet H. L. Bovy. 2004. Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 38, 2 (2004), 169--190.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anders Johansson, Dirk Helbing, and Pradyumn K. Shukla. 2007. Specification of the social force pedestrian model by evolutionary adjustment to video tracking data. Advances in Complex Systems 10, supp02 (2007), 271--288.Google Scholar
- Fatema T. Johora and Jörg P. Müller. 2018. Modeling interactions of multimodal road users in shared spaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC’18). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 3568--3574.Google Scholar
- Yoshiaki Kuwata, Justin Teo, Sertac Karaman, Gaston Fiore, Emilio Frazzoli, and Jonathan P. How. 2008. Motion planning in complex environments using closed-loop prediction. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibition.Google Scholar
- Alon Lerner, Yiorgos Chrysanthou, and Dani Lischinski. 2007. Crowds by example. Computer Graphics Forum 26, 3, 655--664.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert V. Levine and Ara Norenzayan. 1999. The pace of life in 31 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 30, 2 (1999), 178--205.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peng Lin, Jian Ma, and Siuming Lo. 2016. Discrete element crowd model for pedestrian evacuation through an exit. Chinese Physics B 25, 3 (2016), 034501.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Melanie Mitchell. 1998. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Betty J. Mohler, William B. Thompson, Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, Herbert L. Pick, and William H. Warren. 2007. Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed. Experimental Brain Research 181, 2 (2007), 221--228.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mehdi Moussaïd, Dirk Helbing, and Guy Theraulaz. 2011. How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 17 (2011), 6884--6888.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Umit Ozguner, Tankut Acarman, and Keith Alan Redmill. 2011. Autonomous Ground Vehicles. Artech House.Google Scholar
- F. Pascucci, N. Rinke, C. Schiermeyer, B. Friedrich, and V. Berkhahn. 2015. Modeling of shared space with multi-modal traffic using a multi-layer social force approach. Transportation Research Procedia 10 (2015), 316--326.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stefano Pellegrini, Andreas Ess, Konrad Schindler, and Luc Van Gool. 2009. You’ll never walk alone: Modeling social behavior for multi-target tracking. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 261--268.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Rinke, C. Schiermeyer, F. Pascucci, V. Berkhahn, and B. Friedrich. 2017. A multi-layer social force approach to model interactions in shared spaces using collision prediction. Transportation Research Procedia 25 (2017), 1249--1267.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andreas Schadschneider, Wolfram Klingsch, Hubert Klüpfel, Tobias Kretz, Christian Rogsch, and Armin Seyfried. 2009. Evacuation dynamics: Empirical results, modeling and applications. In Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer, 3142--3176.Google Scholar
- Robert Schönauer, Martin Stubenschrott, Weinan Huang, Christian Rudloff, and Martin Fellendorf. 2012. Modeling concepts for mixed traffic: Steps toward a microscopic simulation tool for shared space zones. Transportation Research Record 2316, 1 (2012), 114--121.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Valeria Vignali, Federico Cuppi, Ennia Acerra, Arianna Bichicchi, Claudio Lantieri, Andrea Simone, and Marco Costa. 2019. Effects of median refuge island and flashing vertical sign on conspicuity and safety of unsignalized crosswalks. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 60 (2019), 427--439.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yao Xiao, Ziyou Gao, Yunchao Qu, and Xingang Li. 2016. A pedestrian flow model considering the impact of local density: Voronoi diagram based heuristics approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 68 (2016), 566--580.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hao Xue, Du Q. Huynh, and Mark Reynolds. 2018. SS-LSTM: A hierarchical LSTM model for pedestrian trajectory prediction. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV’18). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1186--1194.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dongfang Yang, Linhui Li, Keith Redmill, and Ümit Özgüner. 2019. Top-view trajectories: A pedestrian dataset of vehicle-crowd interaction from controlled experiments and crowded campus. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV’19). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 899--904.Google Scholar
- Dongfang Yang, Ümit Özgüner, and Keith Redmill. 2018. Social force based microscopic modeling of vehicle-crowd interaction. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV’18). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1537--1542.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Francesco Zanlungo, Tetsushi Ikeda, and Takayuki Kanda. 2011. Social force model with explicit collision prediction. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 93, 6 (2011), 68005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weiliang Zeng, Peng Chen, Guizhen Yu, and Yunpeng Wang. 2017. Specification and calibration of a microscopic model for pedestrian dynamic simulation at signalized intersections: A hybrid approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 80 (2017), 37--70.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weiliang Zeng, Hideki Nakamura, and Peng Chen. 2014. A modified social force model for pedestrian behavior simulation at signalized crosswalks. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 138 (2014), 521--530.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- A Social Force Based Pedestrian Motion Model Considering Multi-Pedestrian Interaction with a Vehicle
Recommendations
The Impact of Vehicle Appearance and Vehicle Behavior on Pedestrian Interaction with Autonomous Vehicles
AutomotiveUI '17: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications AdjunctIn this paper, we present the preliminary results of a study that aims to investigate the role of an approaching vehicle's behavior and outer appearance in determining pedestrians' decisions while crossing a street. Concerning appearance, some vehicles ...
Gaze Patterns in Pedestrian Interaction with Vehicles: Towards Effective Design of External Human-Machine Interfaces for Automated Vehicles
AutomotiveUI '19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsIn road-crossing situations involving negotiation with approaching vehicles, pedestrians need to take into account the behavior of the car before making a decision. To investigate the kind of information about the car that pedestrians seek, and the ...
Vehicle-pedestrian interaction for mixed traffic simulation
Simulation of real-world traffic scenarios is widely needed in virtual environments. Different from many previous works on simulating vehicles or pedestrians separately, our approach aims to capture the realistic process of vehicle-pedestrian ...
Comments