skip to main content
10.1145/3373718.3394753acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslicsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Complexity of controlled bad sequences over finite sets of Nd

Published:08 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

We provide upper and lower bounds for the length of controlled bad sequences over the majoring and the minoring orderings of finite sets of Nd. The results are obtained by bounding the length of such sequences by functions from the Cichon hierarchy. This allows us to translate these results to bounds over the fast-growing complexity classes.

The obtained bounds are proven to be tight for the majoring ordering, which solves a problem left open by Abriola, Figueira and Senno (Theor. Comp. Sci, Vol. 603). Finally, we use the results on controlled bad sequences to prove upper bounds for the emptiness problem of some classes of automata.

References

  1. Parosh Aziz Abdulla, Karlis Cerans, Bengt Jonsson, and Yih-Kuen Tsay. 1996. General Decidability Theorems for Infinite-State Systems. In Proceedings, 11th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science. 313--321. https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.1996.561359Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Parosh Aziz Abdulla and Bengt Jonsson. 2001. Ensuring completeness of symbolic verification methods for infinite-state systems. Theor. Comput. Sci. 256, 1-2 (2001), 145--167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(00)00105-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sergio Abriola and Santiago Figueira. 2014. A note on the order type of minoring orderings and some algebraic properties of ω2-well quasi-orderings. In XL Latin American Computing Conference, CLEI 2014. 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI.2014.6965188Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sergio Abriola, Santiago Figueira, and Gabriel Senno. 2015. Linearizing well quasi-orders and bounding the length of bad sequences. Theor. Comput. Sci. 603 (2015), 3--22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2015.07.012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Joseph B Kruskal. 1972. The Theory of Well-Quasi-Ordering: A Frequently Discovered Concept. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 13 (11 1972), 297--305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0097-3165(72)90063-5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Pierre Chambart and Philippe Schnoebelen. 2008. The Ordinal Recursive Complexity of Lossy Channel Systems. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2008, 24--27 June 2008, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 205--216. https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2008.47Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E.A. Cichon and E.Tahhan Bittar. 1998. Ordinal recursive bounds for Higman's theorem. Theoretical Computer Science 201, 1 (1998), 63--84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(97)00009-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nachum Dershowitz and Zohar Manna. 1979. Proving Termination with Multiset Orderings. Commun. ACM 22, 8 (1979), 465--476. https://doi.org/10.1145/359138.359142Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Michael R. Fellows and Michael A. Langston. 1988. Nonconstructive tools for proving polynomial-time decidability. J. ACM 35, 3 (1988), 727--739. https://doi.org/10.1145/44483.44491Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Diego Figueira. 2010. Reasoning on words and trees with data. Ph.D. Dissertation. École normale supérieure de Cachan, France. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00718605Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Diego Figueira, Santiago Figueira, Sylvain Schmitz, and Philippe Schnoebelen. 2011. Ackermannian and Primitive-Recursive Bounds with Dickson's Lemma. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science. 269--278. https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2011.39Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Alain Finkel and Philippe Schnoebelen. 2001. Well-structured transition systems everywhere! Theor. Comput. Sci. 256, 1-2 (2001), 63--92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(00)00102-XGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Graham Higman. 1952. Ordering by Divisibility in Abstract Algebras. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s3-2, 1 (1952), 326--336. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s3-2.1.326Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Marcin Jurdzinski and Ranko Lazic. 2011. Alternating automata on data trees and XPath satisfiability. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 12, 3 (2011), 19:1--19:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929954.1929956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. H. Löb and S. S. Wainer. 1970. Hierarchies of number-theoretic functions. I. Archiv für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen forschung 13, 1 (Mar 1970), 39--51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01967649Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Bojan Mohar. 1996. Embedding Graphs in an Arbitrary Surface in Linear Time. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing. 392--397. https://doi.org/10.1145/237814.237986Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Fernando Rosa-Velardo. 2017. Ordinal recursive complexity of Unordered Data Nets. Information and Computation 254 (2017), 41--58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2017.02.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sylvain Schmitz. 2014. Complexity Bounds for Ordinal-Based Termination - (Invited Talk). In Reachability Problems - 8th International Workshop, RP 2014. 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11439-2_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sylvain Schmitz. 2016. Complexity Hierarchies beyond Elementary. TOCT 8, 1 (2016), 3:1--3:36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858784Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sylvain Schmitz and Philippe Schnoebelen. 2011. Multiply-Recursive Upper Bounds with Higman's Lemma. In Automata, Languages and Programming - 38th International Colloquium, ICALP 2011. 441--452. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22012-8_35Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Complexity of controlled bad sequences over finite sets of Nd

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        LICS '20: Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
        July 2020
        986 pages
        ISBN:9781450371049
        DOI:10.1145/3373718

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 July 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        LICS '20 Paper Acceptance Rate69of174submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate143of386submissions,37%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader