skip to main content
10.1145/3374549.3374551acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicsebConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Impact of Blockchain on the Auditor's Audit Approach

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The current standard in accounting practice is the double-entry approach. Basis of the double-entry approach is that every financial event brings two equal and offsetting entries. Since these financial events are not automatically confirmed by both parties, the accounting quality can be improved. The blockchain mechanism possibly offers a different take on accounting. Based on an experimentation approach, data was collected to compare the double-entry method with the blockchain-based triple-entry method. The results show that the main difference concerns determining the completeness of the financial statement items. In the situation of double-entry accounting, segregation of duties is applied to do so. In the blockchain situation, the underlying mechanism of the blockchain already ensures this.

References

  1. A. Arens, E. Randal, and M. S. Beasley, Auditing and Assurance Services: An integrated Approach. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. O. S. Ajao, J. O. Olamide, and A. Ayodejitemitope, "Evolution and development of auditing," Unique J. Bus. Manag. Res., 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Nakamoto, "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System," 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Sangster, "The genesis of double entry bookkeeping," Accounting Review. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Dai and M. A. Vasarhelyi, "Toward Blockchain-Based Accounting and Assurance," J. Inf. Syst. Am. Account. Assoc., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 5--21, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Chedrawi and P. Howayeck, "Audit in the Blockchain era within a principal-agent approach," Inf. Commun. Technol. Organ. Soc., 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Mahbod and D. Hinton, "Blockchain: The Future of the Auditing and Assurance Profession.," Armed Forces Comptrol., 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. J. Abdolmohammadi, "The effect of using diagnostic decision aids for analytical procedures on judges' liability judgments," Behav. Res. Account., 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E. Sweet, "Information Systems Auditing: Tools and Techniques Creating Audit Programs," 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Defond et al., "A Review of Archival Auditing Research Acknowledgement: We thank Karen Ton for her excellent research assistance A Review of Archival Auditing Research," 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Steckel, D. Manry, and J. Tritschler, Audit quality: Association between published reporting errors and audit firm characteristics. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. N. Tschakert, J. Kokina, S. Kozlowski, and M. Vasarhelyi, "The next frontier in data analytics - Journal of Accountancy," J. Account., vol. August, pp. 1--9, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C. Zhang, J. Dai, and M. A. Vasarhelyi, "The Impact of Disruptive Technologies on Accounting and Auditing Education.," CPA J., 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. W. Wang et al., "A Survey on Consensus Mechanisms and Mining Strategy Management in Blockchain Networks," IEEE Access, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. C. Cachin and M. Vukolićvukolić, "Blockchain Consensus Protocols in the Wild," 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. V. Gramoli, "From blockchain consensus back to Byzantine consensus," Future Generation Computer Systems, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Gerring and R. McDermott, "An experimental template for case study research," Am. J. Pol. Sci., 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Freddi and M. Salmon, "Design of experiment," in Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. O. Dalle, "On reproducibility and traceability of simulations," in Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. Wang, Z. Zhang, R. Bai, and Y. Mao, "A hybrid system with filter approach and multiple population genetic algorithm for feature selection in credit scoring," J. Comput. Appl. Math., vol. 329, pp. 307--321, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. J. E. Taylor et al., "Open science: Approaches and benefits for modeling & simulation," in Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. T. Monks et al., "A framework to accelerate simulation studies of hyperacute stroke systems," Oper. Res. Heal. Care, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. H. Rahmandad and J. D. Sterman, "Reporting guidelines for simulation-based research in social sciences," Syst. Dyn. Rev., 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. M. Cucculelli, V. Peruzzi, and A. Zazzaro, "Relational capital in lending relationships: evidence from European family firms."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Impact of Blockchain on the Auditor's Audit Approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICSEB '19: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Software and e-Business
      December 2019
      215 pages
      ISBN:9781450376495
      DOI:10.1145/3374549

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 January 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader