skip to main content
10.1145/3374587.3375879acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessing the usability of the Saudi Digital Library from the perspective of Saudi scholarship students

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study aims to assess the usability of the Saudi Digital Library from the perspective of Saudi scholarship students. To this end, it uses a global tool for measuring the usability of computer application interfaces, namely the Software Usability Measurement Inventory (SUMI). It includes five criteria for measuring usability from the user's perspective: effect, efficiency, learnability, helpfulness and control. In general, the participating Saudi scholarship students were neutral about the level of usability in the Saudi Digital Library interface, there was a good level of satisfaction among them, also, there a positive relationship between the usability criteria of the interface of the Saudi Digital Library and user satisfaction. Gender played a role in the, statistical differences in the responses of the participants about the usability of the Saudi Digital Library interface based on in these criteria; these differences were in favor of the male sample. There were also statistical differences in the responses of the participants due to differences in Internet skills, these differences were in favor of participants who had Internet skills.

References

  1. Ferreira, S. and Pithan, D. 2005. Usability of digital libraries: A study based on the areas of information science and human-computer-interaction. OCLC Sysm. Serv. 21, 4 (Dec. 2015), 311--323 http://libproxy.udayton.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lih&AN=43915435&login.asp&site=ehost-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballar d, J. K. 2010. A case study of student perceptions of educational web sites. Dissertation. University of Minnesota, Minnesota, MN. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/91797/Ballard_umn_0130E_11150.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, D. A. and Yannotta, L. 2013. Modeling a Library Website Redesign Process: Developing a User-Centered Website Through Usability Testing. Inform. Technol. Libr.32, 1 (Mar. 2013), 6--22. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=89093592&site=ehost-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Nielsen, J. 2012. Usability 101: Introduction to Usability. Retrieved from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mariner, V. (2002). Logging Usability. School Libr. J. 48, 2 (Feb 2005), 30--31. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=6045454&site=ehost-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Thong, J. Y., Hong, W., and Tam, K. Y. 2004. What leads to user acceptance of digital libraries? Comm. ACM 47, 11 (Nov. 2004), 79--83 at:http://libproxy.udayton.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lih&AN=14958429&login.asp&site=ehost-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Mvungi, S. H., De Jager, K., andUnderwood, P. G. 2008. An evaluation of the information architecture of the UCT Library web site. S. Afr. J. Libr. S.Inf. Sci. 74, 2 (Jan 2008), 171--182 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=40835693&site=ehost-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Koohang, A. and Ondracek, J. 2005. Users' views about the usability of digital libraries. Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 36, 3 (Apr. 2005), 407423. DOI =doi:10.1111/j.14678535.2005.00472.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jeng, J. 2006. Usability of the digital library: An evaluation model. Coll. Res. Libr. News 67, 2 (Feb. 2006), 76--79. http://search.proquest.com/docview/305275273?accountid=142908Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zimmerman, D. and Paschal, D. 2009. An exploratory usability evaluation of Colorado State University Libraries' digital collections and the Western Waters Digital Library Web sites. J. Acad. Libr. 35, 3 (May 2009), 227--240. http://libproxy.udayton.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lih&AN=41788786&login.asp&site=ehost-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Joo, S., Lin, S., and Lu, K. 2011. Usability Evaluation Model for Academic Library Websites: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Learnability. J. Libr. Inf. St. 9, 2 (Dec. 2011), 11--26.http://jlis.lis.ntu.edu.tw/article/v9-2-2.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shaker, A.2008. Measuring the usability of the Arabic First Search database platform. Arab Studies in Libraries and Information Science 13, 1, 79--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Alasem, A. N. 2013. Evaluating the Usability of Saudi Digital Library's Interface (SDL). In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science Science. WCECS, San Francisco, CA,178--181. http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/96451331/evaluating-usability-saudi-digital-librarys-interface-sdlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hong, X. and Wolfram, D. 2002. State Digital Library Usability: Contributing Organizational Factors. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol.53, 13 (Sep. 2002), 1085--1097. http://libproxy.udayton.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lih&AN=8603996&login.asp&site=ehost-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Assessing the usability of the Saudi Digital Library from the perspective of Saudi scholarship students

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CSAI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
      December 2019
      370 pages
      ISBN:9781450376273
      DOI:10.1145/3374587

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 March 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader