skip to main content
10.1145/3374920.3374934acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

CoDa: Collaborative Data Interpretation Through an Interactive Tangible Scatterplot

Published: 09 February 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Tangibles can model abstract structures. One educational subject where this can be utilized is instruction on data visualization inter- pretation. Data physicalizations, tangible representations of data, offer graspable handles for the users to manipulate data visualiza- tions directly so that they can better understand what information they hold. However, investigations on the applicability of interac- tive data physicalizations in educational settings are still sparse. In this paper, we explore how students reason with an interactive tangible scatterplot through a collaborative data interpretation tool, CoDa. We report the design, development, and the user experiences in an exploratory study where 11 students, in groups of 2 to 4, completed a data analysis task with CoDa. The qualitative results show insights in the process of data interpretation, how interaction with the tangibles influenced these data interpretations, how the system aided collaboration and, overall user experience. We believe the results and implications offer a step towards nurturing future educational applications on interactive data physicalizations.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (teifp1064.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Shiroq Al-Megren and Roy A. Ruddle. 2016. Comparing Tangible and Multi-touch Interaction for Interactive Data Visualization Tasks. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 279--286. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839464
[2]
Jason Alexander, Yvonne Jansen, Kasper Hornbæk, Johan Kildal, and Abhijit Karnik. 2015. Exploring the Challenges of Making Data Physical. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15).ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2417--2420. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702659
[3]
Basak Alper, Nathalie Henry Riche, Fanny Chevalier, Jeremy Boy, and Metin Sezgin. 2017. Visualization Literacy at Elementary School. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5485--5497. https://doi. org/10.1145/3025453.3025877
[4]
Mark A Bickhard. 2013. Scaffolding and self-scaffolding: Central aspects of development. In Children's development within social context. Psychology Press, UK, 43--62.
[5]
Katy Börner, Adam Maltese, Russell Nelson Balliet, and Joe Heimlich. 2016. Investigating Aspects of Data Visualization Literacy Using 20 Information Visualizations and 273 Science Museum Visitors. Information Visualization 15, 3 (July 2016), 198--213. https: //doi.org/10.1177/1473871615594652
[6]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.
[7]
Wolfgang Büschel, Ulrike Kister, Mathias Frisch, and Raimund Dachselt. 2014. T4 - Transparent and Translucent Tangibles on Tabletops. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81--88. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598153.2598179
[8]
Alan Chong. 2012. Aligning trends in mainstream media and data visualization with teaching practice. In 2012 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. IEEE, IEEE, Orlando, FL, USA, 1--5.
[9]
Paul Dourish and Victoria Bellotti. 1992. Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '92). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 107--114. https://doi.org/10.1145/143457.143468
[10]
Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. inFORM: Dynamic Physical Affordances and Constraints Through Shape and Object Actuation. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 417--426. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502032
[11]
Nitesh Goyal, Gilly Leshed, and Susan R. Fussell. 2013. Effects of Visualization and Note-taking on Sensemaking and Analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2721--2724. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481376
[12]
Trevor Hogan, Eva Hornecker, Simon Stusak, Yvonne Jansen, Jason Alexander, AndrewVande Moere, Uta Hinrichs, and Kieran Nolan. 2016. Tangible Data, Explorations in Data Physicalization. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 753--756. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2854112
[13]
Michael S. Horn, Erin Treacy Solovey, and Robert J. K. Jacob. 2008. Tangible Programming and Informal Science Learning: Making TUIs Work for Museums. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 194--201. https://doi.org/10.1145/1463689.1463756
[14]
Samuel Huron, Sheelagh Carpendale, Jeremy Boy, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2016. Using VisKit: A Manual for Running a Constructive Visualization Workshop. In Pedagogy of Data Visualization Workshop at IEEE VIS 2016. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01384388
[15]
Samuel Huron, Sheelagh Carpendale, Alice Thudt, Anthony Tang, and Michael Mauerer. 2014. Constructive Visualization. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). ACM, NewYork, NY, USA, 433--442. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598566
[16]
Samuel Huron, Pauline Gourlet, Uta Hinrichs, Trevor Hogan, and Yvonne Jansen. 2017. Let's Get Physical: Promoting Data Physicalization in Workshop Formats. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1409--1422. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064798
[17]
Samuel Huron, Yvonne Jansen, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2014. Constructing visual representations: Investigating the use of tangible tokens. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 20, 12 (2014), 2102--2111.
[18]
Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces Between People, Bits and Atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '97). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 234--241. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549. 258715
[19]
Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Petra Isenberg, Jason Alexander, Abhijit Karnik, Johan Kildal, Sriram Subramanian, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Opportunities and Challenges for Data Physicalization. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3227--3236. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702180
[20]
Ana Jofre, Steve Szigeti, Stephen Tiefenbach Keller, Lan-Xi Dong, David Czarnowski, Frederico Tomé, and Sara Diamond. 2015. A Tangible User Interface for Interactive Data Visualization. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (CASCON '15). IBM Corp., Riverton, NJ, USA, 244--247. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2886444.2886484
[21]
Andreas Kerren, John T. Stasko, and Jason Dykes. 2008. Teaching Information Visualization. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 65--91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--540--70956--5_4
[22]
Gary Klein, Jennifer K Phillips, Erica L Rall, and Deborah A Peluso. 2007. A data--frame theory of sensemaking. In Expertise out of context. Psychology Press, UK, 118--160.
[23]
Elida V Laski, Jamilah R Jordan, Carolyn Daoust, and Angela K Murray. 2015. What makes mathematics manipulatives effective? Lessons from cognitive science and Montessori education. SAGE Open 5, 2 (2015), 2158244015589588.
[24]
Mathieu Le Goc, Lawrence H. Kim, Ali Parsaei, Jean-Daniel Fekete, Pierre Dragicevic, and Sean Follmer. 2016. Zooids: Building Blocks for Swarm User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 97--109. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984547
[25]
Rong-Hao Liang, Kai-Yin Cheng, Chao-Huai Su, Chien-Ting Weng, Bing-Yu Chen, and De-Nian Yang. 2012. GaussSense: Attachable Stylus Sensing Using Magnetic Sensor Grid. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 319--326. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380116. 2380157
[26]
Rong-Hao Liang, Han-Chih Kuo, Liwei Chan, De-Nian Yang, and Bing- Yu Chen. 2014. GaussStones: Shielded Magnetic Tangibles for Multitoken Interactions on Portable Displays. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 365--372. https://doi.org/10. 1145/2642918.2647384
[27]
Joyce Ma, Lisa Sindorf, Isaac Liao, and Jennifer Frazier. 2015. Using a Tangible Versus a Multi-touch Graphical User Interface to Support Data Exploration at a Museum Exhibit. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 33--40. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680555
[28]
Paul Marshall. 2007. Do Tangible Interfaces Enhance Learning?. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 163--170. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1227004
[29]
Paul Marshall, Sara Price, and Yvonne Rogers. 2003. Conceptualising Tangibles to Support Learning. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 101--109. https://doi.org/10.1145/953536.953551
[30]
Gonzalo Gabriel Méndez, Uta Hinrichs, and Miguel A. Nacenta. 2017. Bottom-up vs. Top-down: Trade-offs in Efficiency, Understanding, Freedom and Creativity with InfoVis Tools. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 841--852. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453. 3025942
[31]
Maria Montessori. 2013. The montessori method. Transaction publishers, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
[32]
Miguel A. Nacenta and Gonzalo Gabriel Méndez. 2017. iVoLVER: A Visual Language for Constructing Visualizations from In-the-Wild Data. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 438--441. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132272.3132299
[33]
Sharon Oviatt. 2006. Human-centered Design Meets Cognitive Load Theory: Designing Interfaces That Help People Think. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '06). ACM, NewYork, NY, USA, 871--880. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180639.1180831
[34]
James Patten and Hiroshi Ishii. 2007. Mechanical Constraints As Computational Constraints in Tabletop Tangible Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 809--818. https: //doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240746
[35]
James Patten, Hiroshi Ishii, Jim Hines, and Gian Pangaro. 2001. Sensetable: A Wireless Object Tracking Platform for Tangible User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 253--260. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365112
[36]
Robert Pienta, James Abello, Minsuk Kahng, and Duen H. Chau. 2015. Scalable graph exploration and visualization: Sensemaking challenges and opportunities. In 2015 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BIGCOMP). IEEE, Jeju Island, Korea, 271--278. https: //doi.org/10.1109/35021BIGCOMP.2015.7072812
[37]
Marta Pinto, Rui Raposo, and Fernando Ramos. 2012. Comparison of Emerging Information Visualization Tools for Higher Education. In Proceedings of the 2012 16th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV '12). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 100--105. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2012.27
[38]
Peter Pirolli and Stuart Card. 2005. The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. In Proceedings of international conference on intelligence analysis, Vol. 5. McLean, VA, USA, 2--4.
[39]
Sara Price, Yvonne Rogers, Michael Scaife, Danae Stanton, and Helen Neale. 2003. Using 'tangibles' to promote novel forms of playful learning. Interacting with computers 15, 2 (2003), 169--185.
[40]
David N. Rapp. 2005. Mental Models: Theoretical Issues for Visualizations in Science Education. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 43--60. https: //doi.org/10.1007/1--4020--3613--2_4
[41]
Martina A. Rau. 2017. Conditions for the Effectiveness of Multiple Visual Representations in Enhancing STEM Learning. Educational Psychology Review 29, 4 (01 Dec 2017), 717--761. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10648-016--9365--3
[42]
Oliver Roeder. 2015. tarantino. https://github.com/fivethirtyeight/ data/tree/master/tarantino.
[43]
Andee Rubin, James K. L. Hammerman, and Cliff Konold. 2006. Exploring informal inference with interactive visualization software. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. International Association for Statistics Education, Cape Town, South Africa, 1--6.
[44]
Daniel M. Russell, Mark J. Stefik, Peter Pirolli, and Stuart K. Card. 1993. The Cost Structure of Sensemaking. In Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '93). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 269--276. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 169059.169209
[45]
Bertrand Schneider, Patrick Jermann, Guillaume Zufferey, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2010. Benefits of a tangible interface for collaborative learning and interaction. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 4, 3 (2010), 222--232.
[46]
Daniel L Schwartz and Taylor Martin. 2004. Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction 22, 2 (2004), 129--184.
[47]
Priti Shah and James Hoeffner. 2002. Review of Graph Comprehension Research: Implications for Instruction. Educational Psychology Review 14, 1 (01 Mar 2002), 47--69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013180410169
[48]
Simon Stusak. 2015. Exploring the Potential of Physical Visualizations. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 437--440. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2691604
[49]
Ryo Suzuki, Clement Zheng, Yasuaki Kakehi, Tom Yeh, Ellen Yi-Luen Do, Mark D. Gross, and Daniel Leithinger. 2019. ShapeBots; Shapechanging Swarm Robots. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 493--505. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347911
[50]
Faisal Taher, John Hardy, Abhijit Karnik, Christian Weichel, Yvonne Jansen, Kasper Hornbæk, and Jason Alexander. 2015. Exploring Interactions with Physically Dynamic Bar Charts. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3237--3246. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702604
[51]
Alice Thudt, Uta Hinrichs, Samuel Huron, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2018. Self-Reflection and Personal Physicalization Construction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 154, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173728
[52]
Brygg Ullmer and Hiroshi Ishii. 1997. The metaDESK: Models and Prototypes for Tangible User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '97). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 223--232. https://doi.org/10. 1145/263407.263551
[53]
Brygg Ullmer and Hiroshi Ishii. 2000. Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM systems journal 39, 3.4 (2000), 915--931.
[54]
Brygg Ullmer, Hiroshi Ishii, and Robert J. K. Jacob. 2005. Token+ Constraint Systems for Tangible Interaction with Digital Information. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 1 (March 2005), 81--118. https://doi.org/10.1145/1057237.1057242
[55]
Karthikeyan Umapathy. 2010. Requirements to support collaborative sensemaking. In CSCW CIS Workshop.
[56]
John Underkoffler and Hiroshi Ishii. 1999. Urp: A Luminous-tangible Workbench for Urban Planning and Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 386--393. https://doi.org/10.1145/302979. 303114
[57]
Andrew Vande Moere and Stephanie Patel. 2010. The Physical Visualization of Information: Designing Data Sculptures in an Educational Context. In Visual Information Communication. 1--23.
[58]
Keisha Varma. 2010. Using Interactive Models to Support Content Learning Through Scientific Reasoning. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - Volume 2 (ICLS '10). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 232--233. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1854509.1854625
[59]
Jagoda Walny, Samuel Huron, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2015. An Exploratory Study of Data Sketching for Visual Representation. Computer Graphics Forum 34, 3 (2015), 231--240. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12635 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.12635
[60]
Malte Weiss, Julie Wagner, Yvonne Jansen, Roger Jennings, Ramsin Khoshabeh, James D. Hollan, and Jan Borchers. 2009. SLAP Widgets: Bridging the Gap Between Virtual and Physical Controls on Tabletops. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 481--490. https://doi. org/10.1145/1518701.1518779
[61]
Michelle Hoda Wilkerson and Vasiliki Laina. 2017. Youth Reasoning With Interactive Data Visualizations: A Preliminary Study. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 411--416. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072. 3084302
[62]
Ben Williamson. 2016. Digital education governance: data visualization, predictive analytics, and 'real-time'policy instruments. Journal of Education Policy 31, 2 (2016), 123--141.
[63]
Xiuming Zhang, Tali Dekel, Tianfan Xue, Andrew Owens, Qiurui He, Jiajun Wu, Stefanie Mueller, and William T. Freeman. 2018. MoSculp: Interactive Visualization of Shape and Time. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 275--285. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3242587.3242592
[64]
Oren Zuckerman, Saeed Arida, and Mitchel Resnick. 2005. Extending Tangible Interfaces for Education: Digital Montessori-inspired Manipulatives. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 859--868. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055093

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Multimodal GAI in Arts-Based MultiliteraciesArts-Based Multiliteracies for Teaching and Learning10.4018/979-8-3693-3184-2.ch008(209-244)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Physicalization from Theory to Practice: Exploring Contemporary Challenges for Physicalization DesignCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3658381(368-371)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)VISMOCK: A Programmable Smocking Technique for Creating Interactive Data PhysicalizationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660749(2341-2356)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
TEI '20: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
February 2020
978 pages
ISBN:9781450361071
DOI:10.1145/3374920
  • General Chairs:
  • Elise van den Hoven,
  • Lian Loke,
  • Program Chairs:
  • Orit Shaer,
  • Jelle van Dijk,
  • Andrew Kun
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 February 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. collaborative analysis
  2. data physicalization
  3. education
  4. information visualization
  5. tangible interaction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

TEI '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

TEI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 37 of 132 submissions, 28%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

Upcoming Conference

TEI '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)105
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Multimodal GAI in Arts-Based MultiliteraciesArts-Based Multiliteracies for Teaching and Learning10.4018/979-8-3693-3184-2.ch008(209-244)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Physicalization from Theory to Practice: Exploring Contemporary Challenges for Physicalization DesignCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3658381(368-371)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)VISMOCK: A Programmable Smocking Technique for Creating Interactive Data PhysicalizationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660749(2341-2356)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Enhancing Color Scales for Active Data PhysicalizationsApplied Sciences10.3390/app1401016614:1(166)Online publication date: 24-Dec-2023
  • (2023)The interface is on the table: Systematic Literature Review about interaction design to applications for tangible tabletops.Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3638067.3638091(1-12)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Physicalization from Theory to Practice: Exploring Physicalization Design across DomainsExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3573824(1-7)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)DataLev: Mid-air Data Physicalisation Using Acoustic LevitationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581016(1-14)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)An Accuracy Assessment for Active Data Physicalization2023 27th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV)10.1109/IV60283.2023.00027(103-108)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Adding Visual Data and Interactions for Dynamic Data Physicalization with Augmented Reality2023 27th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV)10.1109/IV60283.2023.00022(71-76)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Remote Laboratory Using Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine as Distance Learning Support2023 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics, Intelligent Manufacture and Industrial Automation (ICAMIMIA)10.1109/ICAMIMIA60881.2023.10427927(1-6)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media