skip to main content
10.1145/3375258.3375276acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsercConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Project Tomo: automated feedback service in teaching programming in Slovenian high schools

Published:07 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Good and immediate feedback is one of the key components in learning programming. Therefore a tool enabling quick feedback can be very useful in the teaching process. As most such services already available had feedback possibilities more or less limited, we developed a new web service called Project Tomo. It is completely open and already has more than 4000 programming exercises that can be adapted and re-used in new courses. At the moment the service is used by over 30 educational establishments, most of which are high schools.

The poster briefly describes the options available in the service and presents its use. Opinions of the teachers using this tool in their teaching are given as well.

References

  1. Higgins, C. A., Gray, G., Symeonidis, P., Tsintsifas, A. (2005). Automated assessment and experiences of teaching programming. J. Educ. Resour. Comput.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ihantola, P., Ahoniemi, T., Karavirta, V., Seppälä, O. (2010). Review of recent systems for automatic assessment of programming assignments. Proceedings of the 10th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling '10). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Pieterse, V., Liebenberg, J. (2017). Automatic vs manual assessment of programming tasks. Proceedings of the 17th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling '17) (pg. 193--194). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Poon, C. K., Wong, T.-L., Yu, Y.-T., Lee, V. C., Tang, C. M. (2016). Toward More Robust Automatic Analysis of Student Program Outputs for Assessment and Learning. IEEE 40th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), (pg. 780--785).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Pretnar, M., Lokar, M. (2015). A Low Overhead Automated Service for teaching Programming. Proceedings of the 15th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. Koli, Finland: Proceedings of the 15th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2828959.2828964Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Rajala, T., Kaila, E., Lindèn, R., Kurvinen, E., Lokkila, E., Laakso, M.-J., Salakoski, T. (2016). Automatically assessed electronic exams in programming courses. Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference (ACSW '16). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Project Tomo: automated feedback service in teaching programming in Slovenian high schools

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CSERC '19: Proceedings of the 8th Computer Science Education Research Conference
          November 2019
          133 pages
          ISBN:9781450377171
          DOI:10.1145/3375258

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 March 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate24of60submissions,40%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader