ABSTRACT
Over the past decade, algorithmic accountability has become an important concern for social scientists, computer scientists, journalists, and lawyers [1]. Exposés have sparked vibrant debates about algorithmic sentencing. Researchers have exposed tech giants showing women ads for lower-paying jobs, discriminating against the aged, deploying deceptive dark patterns to trick consumers into buying things, and manipulating users toward rabbit holes of extremist content. Public-spirited regulators have begun to address algorithmic transparency and online fairness, building on the work of legal scholars who have called for technological due process, platform neutrality, and nondiscrimination principles.
This policy work is just beginning, as experts translate academic research and activist demands into statutes and regulations. Lawmakers are proposing bills requiring basic standards of algorithmic transparency and auditing. We are starting down on a long road toward ensuring that AI-based hiring practices and financial underwriting are not used if they have a disparate impact on historically marginalized communities. And just as this "first wave" of algorithmic accountability research and activism has targeted existing systems, an emerging "second wave" of algorithmic accountability has begun to address more structural concerns. Both waves will be essential to ensure a fairer, and more genuinely emancipatory, political economy of technology. Second wave work is particularly important when it comes to illuminating the promise & perils of formalizing evaluative criteria.
- Frank Pasquale, The Second Wave of Algorithmic Accountability, LPE Blog, Nov. 25, 2019, at https://lpeblog.org/2019/11/25/the-second-wave-of-algorithmic-accountability/Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Machines Judging Humans: The Promise and Perils of Formalizing Evaluative Criteria
Recommendations
Healthy tensions?: assessing FOI uptake in the voluntary sector in Scotland
Special issue on Freedom of InformationThe devolved political settlement in Scotland has been profoundly shaped by the principles of openness, accountability and transparency and by the important role played by Scottish civic society in campaigning for the new Scottish Parliament. The coming ...
Trustworthy AI and the Logics of Intersectional Resistance
FAccT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and TransparencyGrowing awareness of the capacity of AI to inflict harm has inspired efforts to delineate principles for ‘trustworthy AI’ and, from these, objective indicators of ‘trustworthiness’ for auditors and regulators. Such efforts run the risk of formalizing a ...
Shielding or Silencing?: An Investigation into Content Moderation during the Sheikh Jarrah Crisis
GROUPSocial media technologies have been empowering to some human rights activists, providing a platform for exercising free speech and mobilization. However, many activists have voiced concerns and shared experiences they understand as considerable ...
Comments