Aleksandr Poliakov
ABSTRACT
In this work is presented a new design of a rehabilitation exoskeleton intended for the rehabilitation of disabled people and patients with impaired motor functions. A distinctive feature of this design is that the auxiliary legs used in it, in addition to rotational motion drives that simulate the work of the hip joints, are equipped with controlled artificial knee joints, providing biologically natural kinematics of patient during the rehabilitation process. In addition, to solve the problem of motor redundancy in the algorithms of the exoskeleton control system, synergistic quality criteria are used, which also contribute to the realization of biologically natural movements, and, consequently, the quality of rehabilitation effects. The drive control of joints is carried out using commands generated by a hierarchical control system operating based on information from inertial and resistor sensors mounted directly on the exoskeleton elements.
- Gillis, L. 1948. Recent advances in the treatment of arm amputations, kineplastic surgery and arm prostheses. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 3, 227--247. PMID 18099756.Google Scholar
- Poliakov, A., Pakhaliuk, V., Kolesova, M., Shtanko, P. and Ovchinnikova, M. Transfemoral prostheses control in a frame of intellectual-synergetic concept. In Proc. of the 2017-2nd Int. Conf. on Autom., Mech. and Elec. Eng. (AMEE 2017). (Shenzhen, China, 2017). 245--253. DOI=https://doi.org/10.2991/amee-17.2017.51Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morasso, P. 1981. Spatial control of arm movements. Exp. Brain Res. 42, 223--227. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236911Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sanguineti, V., Morasso, P., Baratto, L., Brichetto, G., Mancardi, G.L. and Solaro, C. 2003. Cerebellar ataxia: quantitative assessment and cybernetic interpretations. Hum. Mov. Sci. 22, 189--195. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(02)00159-8Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohan, V. and Morasso, P. 2011. Passive motion paradigm: an alternative to optimal control. Front. Neurorobot., 5, 1--28. DOI=https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2011.00004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Flash, T. and Hogan, N. 1985. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J. Neurosci. 5, 1688--1703. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-07-01688Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morasso, P. 1981. Spatial control of arm movements. Exp. Brain Res. 42, 223--227. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236911Google ScholarCross Ref
- Uno, Y., Kawato, M. and Suzuki, R. 1989. Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Minimum torque-change model. Biol. Cybern. 61, 89--101. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204593Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ben-Itzhak, K.S. and Karniel, A. 2008. Minimum acceleration criterion with constraints implies bang-bang control as an underlying principle for optimal trajectories of arm reaching movements. Neural. Comput. 20, 779--812. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2007.12-05-077Google ScholarDigital Library
- Todorov, E. 2009. Efficient computation of optimal actions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 11478--11483. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710743106Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gottlieb, G.L., Song, Q.L., Hong, D.A. and Corcos, D.M. 1996. Coordinating two degrees of freedom during human arm movement: load and speed invariance of relative joint torques. J. of Neurophys. 76(5), 3196--3206. PMID: 8930266Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gottlieb, G.L., Song, Q.L., Almeida, G.L., Hong, D.A. and Corcos, D.M. 1997. Directional control of planar human arm movement. J. of Neurophys. 78(6), 2985--2998. PMID: 9405518Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fomin, S.V. and Berkinblit, M.B. 1973. Mathematical problems in biology. Moscow, Science. 200.Google Scholar
- Liu, D. and Todorov, E. 2007. Evidence for the flexible sensorimotor strategies predicted by optimal feedback control. J. Neurosci. 27, 9354--9368. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1110-06.2007Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guigon, E., Baraduc, P. and Desmurget, M. 2008. Computational motor control: feedback and accuracy. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27, 1003--1016. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06028.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Kutch, J.J., Kuo, A.D., Bloch, A.M. and Rymer, W.Z. 2008. Endpoint force fluctuations reveal flexible rather than synergistic patterns of muscle cooperation. J. Neurophysiol. 100, 2455--2471. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.90274.2008Google ScholarCross Ref
- Esquenazi, A. and Talaty, M. 2019. Robotics for Lower Limb Rehabilitation. Phy. Med. and Rehab. Clin. of North Am. 30(2), 385--397. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2018.12.012Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhang, L., Chen, W.H., Wang, J.H. and Zhang, J.B. 2018. Adaptive robust slide mode trajectory tracking controller for lower extremity rehabilitation exoskeleton. Proc. of the 2018-13th IEEE Conf. on Indust. Elect. and Appl. (ICIEA 2018). 992--997. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA.2018.8397856Google Scholar
- Vantilt, J., Tanghe, K., Afschrift, M., Bruijnes, A., Junius, K., Geeroms, J. Aertbelien, E., De Groote, F., Lefeber, D., Jonkers, I. and De Schutter, J. 2019. Model-based control for exoskeletons with series elastic actuators evaluated on sit-to-stand movements. J. of Neuroeng. and Rehab.16(1), 65. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0526-8Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shi, L., Fu, L. and Liu, Z. 2018. Model-based active impedance controller development of the exoskeleton rehabilitation robot (ERRobot) for lower extremity. 2018 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiq. Intel. & Comp., Adv. & Trust. Comp., Scal. Comp. & Com., Cloud & Big Data Comp., Int. of People and Smart City Innov. 150--155. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartWorld.2018.00061Google Scholar
- Sanchez-Villamanan, M.D., Gonzalez-Vargas, J., Torricelli, D., Moreno, J.C. and Pons, J.L. 2019. Compliant lower limb exoskeletons: a comprehensive review on mechanical design principles. J. of Neuroeng. and Rehab. 16. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0517-9Google Scholar
- Aliman, N., Ramli, R. and Haris, S.M. 2017. Design and development of lower limb exoskeletons: A survey. Rob. and Autonom. Sys. 95, 102--116. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.05.013Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kolesova, M., Polyakov, A. and Kalinin, M. 2007. Qantitative and qualitative estimations of the manipulator end-effector trajectory planning by synergetic criterion. Facta Universitatis. Ser: Mech., Autom., Cont. and Robot. 6(Special Issues), 53--70. URL= http://facta.junis.ni.ac.rs/macar/macar2007s/macar2007s05.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Poliakov, A., Olinichenko, G., Pashkov, Y., Kalinin, M., Kramar, V. and Burkov, D. 2012. A new design of a unipolar hip endoprosthesis focused on the best quality of life of the patients during the postoperative period. IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICoBE 2012). 22--27. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoBE.2012.6178948Google ScholarCross Ref
- Taha, Z., Abdul Majeed, A., Abidin, A., Ali, M., Khairuddin, I., Deboucha, A. and Wong, M. 2017. A hybrid active force control of a lower limb exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation. Biomed. Eng.-Biomed. Tech. 63(4). DOI= https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2016-0039Google Scholar
- Seraji, H. 1987. A new approach to adaptive control of manipulators. J. of Dyn. Sys., Measure., and Cont. 109, 193--202. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3143844Google Scholar
- Poliakov, A., Pakhaliuk, V., Lozinskiy, N., Kolesova, M., Bugayov, P. and Shtanko, P. 2016. Biosimilar artificial knee for transfemoral prostheses and exoskeletons. Facta Universitatis. Ser. Mech. Eng. 14(3), 321--328. DOI= https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME1603321PGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Moreno, J.S., De Lima, E.R., Ruiz, A.F., Brunetti, F.J. and Pons, J.L. 2006. Design and implementation of an inertial measurement unit for control of artificial limbs: Application on leg orthoses. Sensors and Actuators. B 118, 333--337. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2006.04.039Google ScholarCross Ref
- Poliakov, A. 2018. Motor activity phase recognition of a disabled person at the walking on transfemoral prosthesis. Fundam. and Appl. Prob. of Eng. and Tech. 19(1-4), 58--72 (In Russian).Google Scholar
- Fleming, M.K., Theologis, T., Buckingham, M. and Johansen-Berg, H. 2018. Transcranial direct current stimulation for promoting motor function in cerebral palsy: a review. J. of NeuroEng. and Rehab. 5, 121. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0476-6Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Synthesis of Lower Limbs Exoskeleton for the Rehabilitation of Patients with Disorders of Motor and Proprioceptive Systems
Recommendations
A simulation-based framework with a proprioceptive musculoskeletal model for evaluating the rehabilitation exoskeleton system
Highlights- A simulation-based method with a proprioceptive musculoskeletal model was established to evaluate the rehabilitation exoskeleton.
Abstract Background and objectiveVarious rehabilitation exoskeletons have been designed to help people regain normal gait from stroke effects. However, the evaluation and further optimization of these exoskeletons are not convenient ...
Lower Limb Exoskeleton Using Recumbent Cycling Modality for Post-stroke Rehabilitation
ICIRA 2013: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications - Volume 8102This paper presents a compact exoskeleton robot for post-stroke patients at the early stage of lower limb rehabilitation as soon as they become stable. Unlike the usual walking gait, a new training modality mimicking the popular exercise named recumbent ...
A Novel Lower Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Combined with Wheelchair
Intelligent Robotics and ApplicationsAbstractTo help people with lower limb weakness or disability rehabilitation, this paper develops a novel system of lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton combined with wheelchair. The lower limb exoskeleton is set with 6 degrees of freedom including hip ...
Comments