skip to main content
10.1145/3377049.3377059acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Blood Count Prediction for Disease Prognosis based on Combined Multi-modal Interaction Model with Related Attributes

Published:20 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many machine learning approaches have been applied in order to predict different types of diseases over last few years. Early diagnosis and prognosis depending on these predictions have become very necessary for further treatment policy in different sectors. Moreover, in order to predict something like these diseases or abnormality might need real-life data interaction. The importance of these predictions has led many researchers to study bioinformatics and machine learning. However, selecting correct attributes to design prediction models is also necessary. In this paper we have introduced an approach where several machine learning models will be fitted with the related attributes while performing the predictions from data interaction.

References

  1. Peter C Austin and Ewout W Steyerberg. 2015. The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses. Journal of clinical epidemiology 68, 6 (2015), 627--636.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Min Chen, Yixue Hao, Kai Hwang, Lu Wang, and Lin Wang. 2017. Disease predicttion by machine learning over big data from healthcare communities. Ieee Access 5 (2017), 8869--8879.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, and Albert-Georg Lang. 2009. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods 41, 4 (2009), 1149--1160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreas D Flouris, Konstantina P Poulianiti, Maria S Chorti, Athanasios Z Jamurtas, Dimitrios Kouretas, Emmanuel O Owolabi, Manolis N Tzatzarakis, Aristidis M Tsatsakis, and Yiannis Koutedakis. 2012. Acute effects of electronic and tobacco cigarette smoking on complete blood count. Food and chemical toxicology 50, 10 (2012), 3600--3603.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Beverly George-Gay and Katherine Parker. 2003. Understanding the complete blood count with differential. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 18, 2 (2003), 96--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gregor Gunčar, Matjaž Kukar, Mateja Notar, Miran Brvar, Peter Černelč, Manca Notar, and Marko Notar. 2018. An application of machine learning to haematological diagnosis. Scientific reports 8, 1 (2018), 411.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhasker Gupta. 2016. Interview questions in business analytics. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sunil Kumar and Ilyoung Chong. 2018. Correlation analysis to identify the effective data in machine learning: Prediction of depressive disorder and emotion states. International journal of environmental research and public health 15, 12 (2018), 2907.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Liam Li, Kevin Jamieson, Afshin Rostamizadeh, Ekaterina Gonina, Moritz Hardt, Benjamin Recht, and Ameet Talwalkar. 2018. Massively parallel hyperparameter tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.05934 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Andy Liaw, Matthew Wiener, et al. 2002. Classification and regression by random- Forest. R news 2, 3 (2002), 18--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. An-Nuo Liu, Lu-Lu Wang, Hui-Ping Li, Juan Gong, and Xiao-Hong Liu. 2017. Correlation between posttraumatic growth and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms based on Pearson correlation coefficient: A meta-analysis. The Journal of nervous and mental disease 205, 5 (2017), 380--389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Laura L Nathans, Frederick L Oswald, and Kim Nimon. 2012. Interpreting multiple linear regression: A guidebook of variable importance. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 17, 9 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Daniele Ravì, Charence Wong, Fani Deligianni, Melissa Berthelot, Javier Andreu- Perez, Benny Lo, and Guang-Zhong Yang. 2016. Deep learning for health informatics. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 21, 1 (2016), 4--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Alvin Rajkomar, Eyal Oren, Kai Chen, Andrew M Dai, Nissan Hajaj, Michaela Hardt, Peter J Liu, Xiaobing Liu, Jake Marcus, Mimi Sun, et al. 2018. Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records. NPJ Diggital Medicine 1, 1 (2018), 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. LV Rao, Björn A Ekberg, Diane Connor, Felice Jakubiak, Guy M Vallaro, and Michael Snyder. 2008. Evaluation of a new point of care automated complete blood count (CBC) analyzer in various clinical settings. Clinica Chimica Acta 389, 1--2 (2008), 120--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Yuan Luo, Peter Szolovits, Anand S Dighe, and Jason M Baron. 2016. Using machine learning to predict laboratory test results. American journal of clinical pathology 145, 6 (2016), 778--788.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. E O'Sullivan, E Callely, D O'Riordan, K Bennett, and B Silke. 2012. Predicting outcomes in emergency medical admissions - role of laboratory data and comorbidity. Acute Med 2 (2012), 59--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Derrick W Spell, Dennie V Jones Jr, William F Harper, and J David Bessman. 2004. The value of a complete blood count in predicting cancer of the colon. Cancer detection and prevention 28, 1 (2004), 37--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Vladimir Svetnik, Andy Liaw, Christopher Tong, J Christopher Culberson, Robert P Sheridan, and Bradley P Feuston. 2003. Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. Journal of chemical information and computer sciences 43, 6 (2003), 1947--1958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ayalew Tefferi, Curtis A Hanson, and David J Inwards. 2005. How to interpret and pursue an abnormal complete blood cell count in adults. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 80. Elsevier, 923--936.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mark C Walters and Herbert T Abelson. 1996. Interpretation of the complete blood count. Pediatric Clinics 43, 3 (1996), 599--622.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Stephen F Weng, Jenna Reps, Joe Kai, Jonathan M Garibaldi, and Nadeem Qureshi. 2017. Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data? PloS one 12, 4 (2017), e0174944.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Haomiao Zhou, Zhihong Deng, Yuanqing Xia, and Mengyin Fu. 2016. A new sampling method in particle filter based on Pearson correlation coefficient. Neuro-Computing 216 (2016), 208--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Blood Count Prediction for Disease Prognosis based on Combined Multi-modal Interaction Model with Related Attributes

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICCA 2020: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements
          January 2020
          517 pages
          ISBN:9781450377782
          DOI:10.1145/3377049

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 March 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader