skip to main content
10.1145/3377049.3377066acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Electronic Opinion Analysis System for Library (E-OASL)

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper demonstrates a new algorithm for Electronic Opinion Analysis System (E-OASL) for university library where it can analyze the user opinion on library and categorized it in different classification such as positive, negative, neutral and suggestions. The system also shows the percentage of each classification as system output. Our proposed algorithm is based on hybrid approach of sentiment analysis where machine learning's rule-based classifier and lexicon approach's corpus datastore are utilized. We needed to collect around 1200 raw data from the different types of user who are using university library to build our algorithm. The system integrates MySQL database for faster and better data processing. The paper also shows the evaluation of the E-OASL which showed satisfactory result of effectiveness and efficiency of EOASL compare to manual opinion analysis approach.

References

  1. P. aila, Marisha, V. K. Singh and M. K. Singh, "Evaluating Machine Learning and Unsupervised Semantic Orientation approaches for sentiment analysis of textual reviews," 2012 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, Coimbatore, 2012, pp. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. V. K. Singh, R. Piryani, A. Uddin, P. Waila and Marisha, "Sentiment analysis of textual reviews; Evaluating machine learning, unsupervised and SentiWordNet approaches," 2013 5th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST), Chonburi, Thailand, 2013, pp. 122127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. N. Cao, C. Shi, S. Lin, J. Lu, Y. Lin, C. Lin, "TargetVue: Visual Analysis of Anomalous User Behaviors in Online Communication Systems", IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, vol. 22, no. 1, january 2016, pp-280--289Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. Cambria, B. Schuller, Y. ng Xi a, C. Havasi, "New Avenues in Mining and Sentiment analysis", IEEE Computer Society, March- April 2013, www.computer.org/intelligentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. D. Wu, L. Zheng, and D. L. Olson, "A Decision Support Approach for Online Stock Forum Sentiment Analysis", IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics: systems, vol. 44, no. 8, august 2014, pp-1077--1084Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Moon, R. 1998. Fixed expressions and Idiom in English: a Corpusbased Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Altenberg, B. 2001. On the Phraseology of Spoken English: The Evidence of Recurrent Word-Combinations. ln A. P. Cowie (Ed.) Phraseology. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. K. Shivaprasad and J. Shetty, "Sentiment Analysis of Product Reviews: A review," 2017 International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT), Coimbatore, 2017, pp. 298301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. X. Fang and J. Zhan, "Sentiment Analysis using Product Review Data," Springer: Journal of Big data, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, USA, 2015..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Waila, Marisha, V. K. Singh and M. K. Singh, "Evaluating Machine Learning and Unsupervised Semantic Orientation approaches for sentiment analysis of textual reviews," 2012 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, Coimbatore, 2012, pp. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. V. K. Singh, R. Piryani, A. Uddin, P. Waila and Marisha, "Sentiment analysis of textual reviews; Evaluating machine learning, unsupervised and SentiWordNet approaches," 2013 5th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST), Chonburi, Thailand, 2013, pp. 122--127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. V. K. Singh, R. Piryani, A. Uddin and P. Waila, "Sentiment analysis of Movie reviews and Blog posts," 2013 3rd IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (IACC), Ghaziabad, 2013, pp. 893--898.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. H. Kang, S. Joon, and Y. D. Han., "Senti-lexicon and improved Naïve Bayes algorithms for sentiment analysis of restaurant reviews," Expert Syst Appl, 39:600010, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Moraes, J. F. Valiati, W. P. G. Neto. "Document-level sentiment classification: An empirical comparison between SVM and ANN." Expert Systems with Applications 40.2 (2013): 621--633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A.A.Rahman, S.Sahibuddin, S. Ibrahim, "A Study of Process Improvement Best Practices", IEEE(2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S Trudel, J. M. Lavoie, M. Pare, W. Suryn,"PEM: The Small Company Dedicated Software Process Quality Evaluation Method combining CMMI & ISO/IEC 14598, Springer,2006"Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Felder, "Achieving CMMi compliance with Scrum focusing on ML2 Project management", Business Information systems, University of Applied Sciences & Arts, Northwestern Switzerland, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Lekh and M. Pooja," Exhaustive study of SDLC Phases and their Best Praxctices to create CDP Model for Process Improvement" International Conference on Advances in Computer Engineering and Applications (ICACEA), India,2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Electronic Opinion Analysis System for Library (E-OASL)

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCA 2020: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements
      January 2020
      517 pages
      ISBN:9781450377782
      DOI:10.1145/3377049

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 March 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader