skip to main content
10.1145/3377049.3377104acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Innovative Model for Program Management

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

As the size and complexity of the software projects have been dramatically increased over the decade or so, it is problematic on part of the big software houses which run several projects concurrently. For this, the Program Director and respective project manager sometimes are in trouble to track the projects in proper ways. To resolve this problem, the present research formulates a model by providing essential information of the concurrent project(s) based on various matrices to the Program Director.

Based on this model a dashboard for the Program Director has been suggested. The current industrial practices do not consider the time elapsed for the meetings in assessing the progress of the project. This research has also emphasized on this and includes elapsed time for project tracking. In a nutshell, this research introduces an innovative model for the program management addressing the various natures of the complex projects in huge organization with a view to determining the project problems. The research has generated the idea of task estimation based on resource matrices considering the outcomes of associated meetings for precise and realistic plan.

For the validation of the model, we have implemented a graphical dashboard for the Program Director.

References

  1. Albert Ponsteen, Rob J. Kusters, October 2014. Classification of Human- and Automated Resource Allocation Approaches in Multi-Project Management. 28th IPMA World Congress, IPMA 2014. Rotterdam, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Amgad Badewi, 2016. The impact of project management (PM) and benefits management (BM) practices on project success: Towards developing a project benefits governance framework. International Journal of Project Management 34 (2016) 761--778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Christopher Biesenthal, Ralf Wilden, June 2014. Multi-level project governance: Trends and opportunities. International Journal of Project Management 32 (2014) 1291--1308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Darja Smite, Juris Borzovs, 2008. Managing Uncertainty in Globally Distributed Software Development Projects. Datorzinātne Un Informācijas Tehnoloģijas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E.G. Too, P. Weaver, 2014. The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management 32 (2014) 1382--1394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Fabio Q. B. da Silva, Catarina Costa, A. César C., 2010. Challenges and Solutions in Distributed Software Development Project Management: a Systematic Literature Review. International Conference on Global Software Engineering. Princeton, NJ, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H-Christian Estler, Martin Nordio, Carlo A. Furia and Bertrand Meyer, August 2014. Awareness and Merge Conflicts in Distributed Software Development. 9th International Conference on Global Software Engineering, Shanghai, 18--21. IEEE Computer Society Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Henning Femmer, Marco Kuhrmann, Jorg Stimmer, Jorg Junge, August 2014. Experiences from the Design of an Artifact Model for Distributed Agile Project Management. 9th International Conference on Global Software Engineering. Shanghai, China.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hertogh, M.J.C.M., Westerveld, E., 2010. Playing with complexity. Management and organisation of large infrastructure projects. PhD thesis Erasmus University, Rotterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu, Y., Chan, A., Le, Y., 2012. Conceptual framework of program organization for managing construction megaprojects---Chinese client's perspective. Engineering Project Organizations Conference, Rheden, Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeroen Rijke, Sebastiaan van Herk, Chris Zevenbergen, Richard Ashley, Marcel Hertogh, Ernst ten Heuvelhof, October 2014. Adaptive Programme Management Through A Balanced Performance/Strategy Oriented Focus. International Journal of Project Management, 32 (2014) 1197--1209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Krajewski, L. and Ritzman, L., 2002. Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis Sixth Edition Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Md. Anawarul Kabir, Md. Salahuddin Pasha, Mohammad Abdur Razzak, July 2011. Unified Software Development Model for Free/Open Source Software. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.2, No.3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Miguel Jiménez, Mario Piattini and Aurora Vizcaíno, March 2009. Challenges and Improvements in Distributed Software Development: A Systematic Review. Alarcos Research Group, Institute of Information Technologies & Systems, Escuela Superior de Informática, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Paseo de la Universidad 4, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Muller, R., 2009. Project Governance. Gower, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nielsen, B.B., 2010. Strategic fit, contractual, and procedural governance in alliances. Journal of Business Research. 63, 682--689.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Pellegrinelli, S., 2011. What's in a name: project or programme? International Journal of Project Management V-29, 232--240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. PMI, 2013. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide)---Fifth Edition. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Turner, J.R., 2009. The Handbook of Project-based Management. McGrawHill, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Valentine Casey, Ita Richardson, 2006. Project Management within Virtual Software Teams. International Conference on Global Software Engineering. Florianopolis, Brazil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zane Galviņa, Darja Šmite, 2011. Software Development Processes in Globally Distributed Environment. Scientific Papers, University of Latvia Vol. 770 Computer Science and Information Technologies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An Innovative Model for Program Management

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCA 2020: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements
      January 2020
      517 pages
      ISBN:9781450377782
      DOI:10.1145/3377049

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 March 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader