skip to main content
10.1145/3377049.3377131acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Application of Neuro-GA Hybrids in Sensor Optimization for Structural Health Monitoring

Published:20 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an application of Neuro-GA methodology to tailor an Optimal Sensor Placement (OSP) strategy for effective Structural Health Monitoring. In recent years, OSP has become a prominent research topic for its capability to ensure effective experimental design with minimal resources. Literature suggests that Genetic Algorithms (GAs) have the potential to give promising results in OSP problem. However, in some cases, these results can be consequences of repeated computational effort in a large number of generations leading to a slower convergence. Generally, various operators in GAs were used to overcome these situations. But, the performance of those operators largely depends on the quality of the randomly generated population sets. Thus, to solve these problems, this paper illustrates an approach to improve GA with some populations of better fitness through Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and guide the GA in search of the global optimum. Two back-propagation neural networks with two fast converging training algorithms were used to individually combine with GA and later, both the hybrids were applied to determine the number and location of sensors in a benchmark bridge structure. The computational result demonstrated that proposed hybrid algorithms could sufficiently detect locations with better convergence.

References

  1. Randall J. Allemang and David L. Brown. 1982. A Correlation Coefficient for Modal Vector Analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC I). SEM Orlando, Orlando, FL, USA, 110--116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cem Ayyıldız, Huseyin Emre Erdem, Tamer Dirikgil, Oguz Dugenci, Taşkin Koçak, Fatih Altun, and Vehbi Çağrı Güngör. 2019. Structure Health Monitoring Using Wireless Sensor Networks on Structural Elements. Ad Hoc Networks 82 (Jan. 2019), 68--76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.06.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Munni Rani Banik and Tonmoy Das. 2019. An Integer-Constrained Genetic Algorithm for Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring. In 2019 International Conference on Computer, Communication, Chemical, Material and Electronic Engineering (IC4ME2). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1--5. in press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Imad A. Basheer and Maha N. Hajmeer. 2000. Artificial Neural Networks: Fundamentals, Computing, Design, and Application. Journal of Microbiological Methods 43, 1 (Dec. 2000), 3--31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00201-3 Neural Computting in Micrbiology.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Md Zakirul Alam Bhuiyan, Guojun Wang, Jiannong Cao, and Jie Wu. 2014. Sensor Placement with Multiple Objectives for Structural Health Monitoring. ACM Trans. Sen.Netw. 10, 4, Article 68 (June 2014), 45 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2533669Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shifei Ding, Hui Li, Chunyang Su, Junzhao Yu, and Fengxiang Jin. 2013. Evolutionary Artificial Neural Networks: A Review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 39, 3 (March 2013), 251--260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9270-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Shirley J. Dyke. 2011. Report on the Cable-stayed Bridge Control Problem - Phase I. Retrieved January 22, 2020 from https://datacenterhub.org/resources/2814Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shirley J. Dyke, Juan M. Caicedo, Gürsoy Turan, Lawrence A. Bergman, and Steve Hague. 2003. Phase I Benchmark Control Problem for Seismic Response of Cable-Stayed Bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering 129, 7 (July 2003), 857--872. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(857)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Akbar A. Javadi, Raziyeh Farmani, and Teng P. Tan. 2005. A Hybrid Intelligent Genetic Algorithm. Advanced Engineering Informatics 19, 4 (Oct. 2005), 255--262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2005.07.003 Computing in Civil Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kang Liu, Ren-Jun Yan, and Carlos Guedes Soares. 2018. Optimal Sensor Placement and Assessment for Modal Identification. Ocean Engineering 165 (Oct. 2018), 209--220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.07.034Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Wieslaw Ostachowicz, Rohan Soman, and Pawel Malinowski. 2019. Optimization of Sensor Placement for Structural Health Monitoring: A Review. Structural Health Monitoring 18, 3 (Jan. 2019), 963--988. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719825601Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Yi Tan and Limao Zhang. 2019. Computational Methodologies for Optimal Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring: A Review. Structural Health Monitoring 0, Online (Oct. 2019), 1475921719877579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719877579Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chen Yang, Ke Liang, Xuepan Zhang, and Xinyu Geng. 2019. Sensor Placement Algorithm for Structural Health Monitoring with Redundancy Elimination Model Based on Sub-clustering Strategy. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 124 (June 2019), 369--387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.01.057Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ting-Hua Yi, Hong-Nan Li, and Ming Gu. 2011. Optimal Sensor Placement for Structural Health Monitoring Based on Multiple Optimization Strategies. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 20, 7 (June 2011), 881--900. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.712Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kai Zhou, Zheng Yi Wu, Xiao Hua Yi, Da Peng Zhu, Rahul Narayan, and Ji Zhao. 2017. Generic Framework of Sensor Placement Optimization for Structural Health Modeling. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 31, 4 (Feb. 2017), 04017018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000662Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Application of Neuro-GA Hybrids in Sensor Optimization for Structural Health Monitoring

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              ICCA 2020: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements
              January 2020
              517 pages
              ISBN:9781450377782
              DOI:10.1145/3377049

              Copyright © 2020 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 20 March 2020

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader