skip to main content
10.1145/3377290.3377317acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

AI for all: defining the what, why, and how of inclusive AI

Published:06 February 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

There has been a growing awareness of Artificial Intelligence's (AI) inherent biases, limitations, and the challenges in overcoming them. As AI is integrated into to all things technical, there is a valid concern over its diversity, inclusiveness, and accessibility. However, questions such as what does it mean for AI to be inclusive, why is inclusive AI required, and how can it be achieved, largely remain unanswered. In this paper, we highlight these issues to initiate discussions on what it means for AI to be inclusive.

References

  1. Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine bias. ProPublica, May 23 (2016), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Laszlo Boack and Brian Welle. 2014. You don't know what you don't know: How our unconscious minds undermine the workplace. https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/you-dont-know-what-you-dont-know-how.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anupam Chander. 2017. THE RACIST ALGORITHM? Michigan Law Review 115, 6 (2017), 1023--1045.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kate Crawford, Roel Dobbe, Theodora Dryer, Genevieve Fried, Ben Green, Elizabeth Kaziunas, Amba Kak, Varoon Mathur, Erin McElroy, Andrea Nill Sánchez, Deborah Raji, Joy Lisi Rankin, Rashida Richardson, Jason Schultz, Sarah Myers West, and Meredith Whittaker. 2019. AI Now 2019 Report. AI Now Institute, New York. https://ainowinstitute.org/AI{_}Now{_}2019{_}Report.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kate Crawford, Meredith Whittaker, Madeleine Clare Elish, Solon Barocas, Aaron Plasek, and Kadija Ferryman. 2016. The AI Now report: The social and economic implications of artificial intelligence technologies in the near-term. In AI Now public symposium, hosted by the White House and New York University's Information Law Institute, July 7th. AI Now Institute, New York. https://ainowinstitute.org/AI{_}Now{_}2016{_}Report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jeffrey Dastin. 2018. Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. San Fransico, CA: Reuters. Retrieved on October 9 (2018), 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Luciano Floridi, Josh Cowls, Monica Beltrametti, Raja Chatila, Patrice Chazerand, Virginia Dignum, Christoph Luetge, Robert Madelin, Ugo Pagallo, Francesca Rossi, et al. 2018. AI4People-An ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines 28, 4 (2018), 689--707.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Raymond Fok, Harmanpreet Kaur, Skanda Palani, Martez E. Mott, and Walter S. Lasecki. 2018. Towards More Robust Speech Interactions for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Users. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 57--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jessica Guynn. 2015. Google Photos labeled black people `gorillas'. https://eu.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/07/01/google-apologizes-after-photos-identify-black-people-as-gorillas/29567465/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Matthew Guzdial, Nicholas Liao, Jonathan Chen, Shao-Yu Chen, Shukan Shah, Vishwa Shah, Joshua Reno, Gillian Smith, and Mark O Riedl. 2019. Friend, Collaborator, Student, Manager: How Design of an AI-Driven Game Level Editor Affects Creators. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, Vol. 14. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Michael Haenlein and Andreas Kaplan. 2019. A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: On the Past, Present, and Future of Artificial Intelligence. California Management Review 61, 4 (aug 2019), 5--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Rob High. 2012. The era of cognitive systems: An inside look at IBM Watson and how it works. Technical Report. http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpapers/pdfs/redp4955.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Migle Laukyte. 2017. Artificial agents among us: Should we recognize them as agents proper? Ethics and Information Technology 19, 1 (mar 2017), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Vincent C. Müller and Nick Bostrom. 2014. Future progress in artificial intelligence. AI Matters 1, 1 (sep 2014), 9--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Changhoon Oh, Jungwoo Song, Jinhan Choi, Seonghyeon Kim, Sungwoo Lee, and Bongwon Suh. 2018. I Lead, You Help but Only with Enough Details. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, Vol. 2018-April. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Reema Patel. 2019. Public deliberation could help address AI's legitimacy problem in 2019. https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/public-deliberation-could-help-address-ais-legitimacy-problem-in-2019/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Luiz Pessoa. 2017. Do Intelligent Robots Need Emotion? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21, 11 (nov 2017), 817--819.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Tom Simonite. 2018. When it comes to gorillas, google photos remains blind. Wired, January 13 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Konstantinos Stathoulopoulos and Juan C Mateos-Garcia. 2019. Gender Diversity in AI Research. SSRN Electronic Journal (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mariarosaria Taddeo and Luciano Floridi. 2018. How AI can be a force for good. Science 361, 6404 (aug 2018), 751--752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Jin Wei. 2018. Research Progress and Application of Computer Artificial Intelligence Technology. MATEC Web of Conferences 176 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. James Zou and Londa Schiebinger. 2018. AI can be sexist and racist - it's time to make it fair. Nature 559, 7714 (jul 2018), 324--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. AI for all: defining the what, why, and how of inclusive AI

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AcademicMindtrek '20: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Academic Mindtrek
        January 2020
        182 pages
        ISBN:9781450377744
        DOI:10.1145/3377290

        Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 February 2020

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        AcademicMindtrek '20 Paper Acceptance Rate24of45submissions,53%Overall Acceptance Rate110of207submissions,53%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader