skip to main content
10.1145/3377290.3377319acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Learning analytics of CS0 students programming errors: the case of data science minor

Published: 06 February 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In this work, I report the preliminary results and further research design of the study on coding errors in the first year of Data Science Minor course. The larger aim of the project is the analysis of changes in the amount, type, and complexity of errors students get and the connection between the patterns of these changes, mathematical and CS background, as well as self-regulation, motivation, and previous academic successes.

References

[1]
Phillip Ackerman, Ruth Kanfer, and Charles Calderwood. 2013. High School Advanced Placement and Student Performance in College: STEM Majors, Non-STEM Majors, and Gender Differences. Teachers College Record 115 (10 2013).
[2]
Norazlina Ahmad, Zaidatun Tasir, Jamri Kasim, and Harun Sahat. 2013. Automatic Detection of Learning Styles in Learning Management Systems by Using Literature-based Method. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 103 (Nov. 2013), 181--189.
[3]
Brett A. Becker. 2016. An Effective Approach to Enhancing Compiler Error Messages. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education - SIGCSE '16. ACM Press, Memphis, Tennessee, USA, 126--131.
[4]
Moon-Heum Cho and Jin Soung Yoo. 2017. Exploring online students' self-regulated learning with self-reported surveys and log files: a data mining approach. Interactive Learning Environments 25, 8 (Nov. 2017), 970--982.
[5]
Analía Cicchinelli, Eduardo Veas, Abelardo Pardo, Viktoria Pammer-Schindler, Angela Fessl, Carla Barreiros, and Stefanie Lindstädt. 2018. Finding traces of self-regulated learning in activity streams. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge - LAK '18. ACM Press, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 191--200.
[6]
A. Forte and M. Guzdial. 2005. Motivation and Nonmajors in Computer Science: Identifying Discrete Audiences for Introductory Courses. IEEE Transactions on Education 48, 2 (May2005), 248--253.
[7]
Maria Hristova, Ananya Misra, Megan Rutter, and Rebecca Mercuri. 2003. Identifying and correcting Java programming errors for introductory computer science students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 35, 1 (Jan. 2003), 153.
[8]
Kris M.Y. Law, Victor C.S. Lee, and Y.T. Yu. 2010. Learning motivation in e-learning facilitated computer programming courses. Computers & Education 55, 1 (Aug. 2010), 218--228.
[9]
Griet Lust, Jan Elen, and Geraldine Clarebout. 2013. Regulation of tool-use within a blended course: Student differences and performance effects. Computers & Education 60, 1 (Jan. 2013), 385--395.
[10]
Davin McCall and Michael Kolling. 2014. Meaningful categorisation of novice programmer errors. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings. IEEE, Madrid, Spain, 1--8.
[11]
Ilya Musabirov and Alina Bakhitova. 2017. Trajectories of student interaction with learning resources in blended learning: the case of data science minor. In Proceedings of the 17th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research - Koli Calling '17. ACM Press, Koli, Finland, 191--192.
[12]
Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino, José A. Ruipérez Valiente, and Carlos Delgado Kloos. 2013. Inferring higher level learning information from low level data for the Khan Academy platform. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge - LAK '13. ACM Press, Leuven, Belgium, 112.
[13]
Abelardo Pardo, Feifei Han, and Robert A. Ellis. 2016. Exploring the relation between self-regulation, online activities, and academic performance: a case study. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge - LAK '16. ACM Press, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 422--429.
[14]
Anthony Picciano. 2014. Big Data and Learning Analytics in Blended Learning Environments: Benefits and Concerns. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 2, 7 (2014), 35.
[15]
Timothy Rafalski, P. Merlin Uesbeck, Cristina Panks-Meloney, Patrick Daleiden, William Allee, Amelia Mcnamara, and Andreas Stefik. 2019. A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Wild Wild West of Scientific Computing with Student Learners. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - ICER '19. ACM Press, Toronto ON, Canada, 239--247.
[16]
Kelly Rivers, Erik Harpstead, and Ken Koedinger.2016. Learning Curve Analysis for Programming: Which Concepts do Students Struggle With?. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - ICER '16. ACM Press, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 143--151.
[17]
Margaret Sue Scott and G. Richard Tucker. 1974. ERROR ANALYSIS AND ENGLISH-LANGUAGE STRATEGIES OF ARAB STUDENTS 1$. Language Learning 24, 1 (Jan. 1974), 69--97.
[18]
Allan Wigfield and Jacquelynne S. Eccles. 2000. Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 1 (Jan. 2000), 68--81.
[19]
Barry J. Zimmerman. 2008. Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects. American Educational Research Journal 45, 1 (March 2008), 166--183.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Retention Factors in STEM Education Identified Using Learning Analytics: A Systematic ReviewEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1211078112:11(781)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
AcademicMindtrek '20: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Academic Mindtrek
January 2020
182 pages
ISBN:9781450377744
DOI:10.1145/3377290
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 February 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. blended learning
  2. data science
  3. learning analytics
  4. logs

Qualifiers

  • Poster

Conference

AcademicMindtrek '20
AcademicMindtrek '20: Academic Mindtrek 2020
January 29 - 30, 2020
Tampere, Finland

Acceptance Rates

AcademicMindtrek '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 45 submissions, 53%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 110 of 207 submissions, 53%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Retention Factors in STEM Education Identified Using Learning Analytics: A Systematic ReviewEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1211078112:11(781)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media