skip to main content
10.1145/3377571.3377579acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Technology-Enhanced Learning: Teaching Self-Monitoring and English Oral Presentation Skills in Graduate Program

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Effective oral presentation skills are essential in educational, social, and professional life. Although the advantages of the focused self-monitoring strategies on language learning are theoretically sound, the empirical evidence on EFL graduate students' oral presentation performance is limited. The study explored the effects of focused self-monitoring and general self-monitoring, actualized by videotaping and implementing e-Portfolio, on graduate students' English oral presentation performance. 48 students enrolled in the graduate program were randomly assigned into two self-monitoring conditions. English oral presentations were videotaped and uploaded to ePortfolio. Students in the focused self-monitoring group were asked to observe the video clips with a list of important criteria of the presentation, whereas students in the general self-monitoring group viewed the performances without the list. The findings showed that students in the focused self-monitoring group outperformed their counterparts in the general self-monitoring group on the English oral presentations of their thesis proposal defense rehearsals. In addition, self-monitoring enhanced students' self- efficacy and use of self-regulated learning strategies. With regard to the effects of self-monitoring on students' learning motivation, no significant difference was found and students in both groups showed positive attitudes toward the training process of self-monitoring and oral presentation.

References

  1. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbooks of self-regulation. Elsevier B.V.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Fallows, S. & Steven, C. (2000). Building Employability Skills into the Higher Education Curriculum: A University-wide Initiative. Education& Training, 42(2), 75--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Hsu, P. Y. (2008). Training college students to use self-monitoring strategies in English speech, Chaoyang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Huff, J. D., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2009). Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 161--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Delclos, V. R., & Harrington, C. (1991). Effects of strategy monitoring and proactive instruction on children's problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 35--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lan, W. Y., Repman, J., & Chyung, S. Y. (1998). Effects of practicing self-monitoring of mathematical problem-solving heuristics on impulsive and reflective college students' heuristics knowledge and problem-solving ability. Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 32--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Maag, J. W., Rutherford, R. B., & DiGangi, S. A. (1992). Effects of self-monitoring and contingent reinforcement on on-task behavior and academic productivity of learning disabled students. A social validation study. Psychology in the Schools, 29, 157--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ozturk, G. & Gurbuz, N. (2013). The impact of gender on foreign language speaking anxiety and motivation. Porcedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 654--665.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Patil, Z. N. (2006). Oral presentation skills for prospective business executives. Asian EFL Journal, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Sudre, D. L., & Kitsantas, A. (2004). An exploration of the psychology of the examinee: Can examinee self-regulation and test-taking motivation predict consequential and non-consequential test performance? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 6--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Tanveer, M. (2007). Investigation of the factors that cause language anxiety for ESL/EFL learners in learning speaking skills and the influence it casts on communication in the target language. Master's thesis, University of Glasgow, Scotland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 32, 73--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Seidner (Eds.), Self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 13--69). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis. In B.J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 1--65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Zhou, Y., & Wei, M. (2018). Strategies in technology-enhanced language learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8 (2), 471--495.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., & Roberts, E. D. (2011). Encouraging self-regulated learning in the classroom: A review of the literature. Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium (MERC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Technology-Enhanced Learning: Teaching Self-Monitoring and English Oral Presentation Skills in Graduate Program

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IC4E '20: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning
      January 2020
      441 pages
      ISBN:9781450372947
      DOI:10.1145/3377571

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 May 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader