skip to main content
10.1145/3377571.3377594acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Moderating Effect of Artificial Intelligence Phobia on the Relationship between Trust and Product Promotion Effectiveness: An Exploratory Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This research aims to examine the moderating effect of artificial intelligence phobia (AI-phobia) on the relationship between perceived trust and product promotion effectiveness in a recommendation system. The perceived trust consists of three subtypes of trusts: competence trust, benevolence trust and integrity trust. The experimental result shows that the moderating effect is nonsignificant.

References

  1. Li, S.S. and E. Karahanna, Online recommendation systems in a B2C E-commerce context: a review and future directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2015. 16(2): p. 72--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Komiak and Benbasat, The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 2006: p. 941--960.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gomez-Uribe, C.A. and N. Hunt, The netflix recommender system: Algorithms, business value, and innovation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 2016. 6(4): p. 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Nguyen, T.T., et al., Multi-Label Classification via Incremental Clustering on Evolving Data Stream. Pattern Recognition, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Komiak, S.Y.X. and I. Benbasat, A two-process view of trust and distrust building in recommendation agents: A process-tracing study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2008. 9(12): p. 2--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Qiu, L. and I. Benbasat, Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2009. 25(4): p. 145--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Benbasat, I. and W. Wang, Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2005. 6(3): p. 4--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Komiak and Benbasat, A two-process view of trust and distrust building in recommendation agents: A process-tracing study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2008. 9(12): p. 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Sztompka, P., Trust: A sociological theory. 1999: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Reeves, B. and C.I. Nass, The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. 1996: Cambridge university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassell, J. and T. Bickmore, External manifestations of trustworthiness in the interface. Communications of the ACM, 2000. 43(12): p. 50--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jian, J.-Y., A.M. Bisantz, and C.G. Drury, Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 2000. 4(1): p. 53--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Xiao, S. and I. Benbasat, The impact of internalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. AIS SIG-HCI, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. McKnight, D.H., V. Choudhury, and C. Kacmar, Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 2002. 13(3): p. 334--359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayer, R.C., J.H. Davis, and F.D. Schoorman, An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 1995. 20(3): p. 709--734.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Komiak, S.X. and I. Benbasat, Understanding customer trust in agent-mediated electronic commerce, web-mediated electronic commerce, and traditional commerce. Information Technology and Management, 2004. 5(1-2): p. 181--207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Doney, P.M. and J.P. Cannon, An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 1997. 61(2): p. 35--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Chopra, K. and W.A. Wallace. Trust in electronic environments. in 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the. 2003. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Slonim, J., et al. An extensible, human-centric framework that promotes universal access to electronic commerce. in International Symposium on Electronic Commerce. 2001. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Hultink, E.J., et al., Industrial new product launch strategies and product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1997. 14(4): p. 243--257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hostler, R.E., et al., Assessing the impact of recommender agents on on-line consumer unplanned purchase behavior. Information & Management, 2011. 48(8): p. 336--343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu, X., Z. Lin, and H. Zhang, Trust promoting seals in electronic markets: an exploratory study of their effectiveness for online sales promotion. Journal of Promotion Management, 2002. 9(1-2): p. 163--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Luk, S.T. and L.S. Yip, The moderator effect of monetary sales promotion on the relationship between brand trust and purchase behaviour. Journal of Brand Management, 2008. 15(6): p. 452--464.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jay, T.B., Computerphobia: What to do about it. Educational Technology, 1981. 21(1): p. 47--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosen, L.D., D.C. Sears, and M.M. Weil, Computerphobia. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 1987. 19(2): p. 167--179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Osiceanu, M.-E., Psychological implications of modern technologies:"technofobia" versus "technophilia". Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015. 180: p. 1137--1144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Khasawneh, O.Y., Technophobia: Examining its hidden factors and defining it. Technology, 2018. 13: p. 60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lohmöller, J.-B., Predictive vs. structural modeling: PLS vs. ML, in Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. 1989, Springer. p. 199--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Hair Jr, J.F., et al., A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 2016: Sage publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Moderating Effect of Artificial Intelligence Phobia on the Relationship between Trust and Product Promotion Effectiveness: An Exploratory Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IC4E '20: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning
      January 2020
      441 pages
      ISBN:9781450372947
      DOI:10.1145/3377571

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 May 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader