skip to main content
10.1145/3377571.3377606acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What Are the Key Barriers for the Course Comprehension of Chinese Students in Lecture of French Higher Education?: A DANP Approach

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

France is the first non-English speaking host country with high-quality education system and multiple preferential policies offering for foreign students. Chinese students in increasing numbers take France as the first choice among those non-English speaking host countries in EU. The purpose of this article is to focus on assessing and improving the efficiency of the comprehension to reduce the gaps in studying in French class caused by the difference between French higher education system and the one of China among dimensions and criteria to achieve the aspiration level. We proposed a hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) model to solve these problems, the Analytic Network Process (ANP) is used to estimate the direct influence between strategic objectives, and the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) is used to obtain a matrix containing the full influences (direct and indirect) between dimensions and criteria. The results showed that teacher factor is the most influential one than others. This study related to interdisciplinary areas can provide governments and universities with a knowledge-based understanding of how to improve foreign students' comprehension that reduce the learning gaps.

References

  1. Campus France. 2019. Key Figures. CIAGraphic. https://www.campusfrance.org/fr/ressource/chiffres-cles-2019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alk-Hal, S. 2007. Foreign Students face to the French Academic Teaching Ways: the influence of Lectures and Laboratory classes on the rate of failure in first year on university studies, the case of the Economic and Management Sciences of the university Lumiere Lyon 2. Doctoral dissertation. University of Lyon 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Carras C. 2007. "Access to specialized French content: linguistic, pragmatic and cultural aspects. What preparation for foreign students following specialized courses?" Olivier Bertrand and Isabelle Schaffner (Eds). Learning specialized language: cultural and linguistic issues. Paris, Editions Ecole Polytechnique. (2007) 121--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Vignes, L. 2013. Testimony from Chinese students at the university in France: from teaching / learning culture to personal strategies. Synergies China. 8 (2013), 125--135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouvier, B. 2003. Chinese and French: when cultural habits of learning oppose each other. Ela. Études de linguistique appliquée. 4 (Apr. 2003), 399--414.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. 1974. DEMATEL, innovative methods, technical report no. 2, structural analysis of the world problematique. Battelle Geneva Research Institute. NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Saaty, T. L. 2000. Fundamentals of decision-making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. 6. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiu, W. Y., Tzeng, G. H., & Li, H. L. 2013. A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business. Knowledge-Based Systems. 37 (Jan. 2013), 48--61. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2012.06.017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ganji, S. S., Rassafi, A. A., & Kordani, A. A. 2018. Vehicle safety analysis based on a hybrid approach integrating DEMATEL, ANP and ER. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 22, 11 (Nov. 2018), 4580--4592. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-1720-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferris, D. 1998. Students' views of academic aural/oral skills: A comparative needs analysis. TESOL Quarterly. 32 (Jan. 2012), 289--318. DOI= https://doi.org/10.2307/3587585Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Devine, T. G. 1982. Listening skills schoolwide: Activities and programs. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Krashen, S.D., Terrell, T.D., Ehrman, M.E., & Herzog, M. 1984. A theoretical basis for teaching the receptive skills. Foreign Language Annals. 17, 4 (Sep. 1984), 261--275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Boyle, J. P. 1984. Factors affecting listening comprehension. ELT Journal. 38, 1 (Jan. 1984), 4--38. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/38.1.34Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Cavalla, C. 2010. Academic methodology: form and content. Recherches et Applications-FDLM. 47 (2010), 153--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Piolat, A. 2004. Note-taking: emergency writing. Ecriture: Approches en sciences cognitives. (2004), 205--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosenshine, B. 1986. Towards an effective teaching of structured subjects. An action model inspired by the assessment of process-product research. L'art et la science de l'enseignement. (1986), 81--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, H. I. 2016. Adaptation of students in a French Taiwanese university exchange program: how and why consider a program preparatory FLE for them. Doctoral dissertation. University of Lyon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. 1987. The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL quarterly. 21, 4 (Dec. 1987), 737--758. DOI= https://doi.org/10.2307/3586992Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Saaty, T. L. 1996. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process: The Organization and Prioritization of Complexity. RWS Publications. Pittsburgh, PA. (1996), 362--370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. 1972. World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. In Battelle Geneva Research Center. Geneva, Switzerland, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. 2000. Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Focus Your Organization on Strategy-with the Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business Review. 78, 5 (Sep. 2000), 167--176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. 2004. Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. What Are the Key Barriers for the Course Comprehension of Chinese Students in Lecture of French Higher Education?: A DANP Approach

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        IC4E '20: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning
        January 2020
        441 pages
        ISBN:9781450372947
        DOI:10.1145/3377571

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 May 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader