skip to main content
10.1145/3377571.3377626acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Inference of the Us and Chinese Stock Markets Using Statistical and Computational Methods

Published: 03 May 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In the contemporary era, people have strong incentives to explore the underlying principles of stock markets and China and the US are the 2 largest economies across the world. So, it is the stock markets in these two countries that we need to explore and study in this paper. In order to test whether the trends of the US and Chinese stock market are predictable and identify the difference between these two markets, we employed various models to study the S&P 500 and CSI 300 indexes' trends. Specifically, in this paper, we included the Markov chain, hidden Markov model (HMM), logistical regression with lasso, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and support vector machine (SVM) to achieve our target.Therefore, we obtained several interesting key findings in our paper. We found that the Chinese stock market is more likely to be affected by technical indicators instead of historical information, as logistical regression with lasso selected most of the technical indicators and the estimated order of the Markov chain is zero when modelling the CSI 300 trends, which is different from the US stock market. Also, the AUC value of SVM outperformed other models used in the US stock market, at 0.731, while ARIMA model resulted in high AUC values in both markets, at 0.606 and 0.622 for the US and Chinese stock markets respectively. So, we confirmed that the Chinese stock market is less efficient than the US stock market. What's more, to predict the future trends in the US stock market, SVM could be the best choice, while ARIMA model works effectively for both markets.

References

[1]
Acero, A., Deng, L., Kristjansson, T., and Zhang, J. (2000). Hmm adaptation using vector taylor series for noisy speech recognition. In Sixth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.
[2]
Akaikei, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of maximum likelihood principle. In Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on Information Theory, pages 267--281.
[3]
Alam, I. M. S. and Sickles, R. C. (1998). The relationship between stock market returns and technical efficiency innovations: evidence from the us airline industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9(1):35--51.
[4]
Asadi, S., Hadavandi, E., Mehmanpazir, F., and Nakhostin, M. M. (2012). Hybridization of evolutionary levenberg-marquardt neural networks and data pre-processing for stock market prediction. Knowledge-Based Systems, 35:245--258.
[5]
Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of econometrics, 31(3):307--327.
[6]
Di, X. (2014). Stock trend prediction with technical indicators using svm. Independent Work Report, Stanford Univ. Fama, E. F. (1995). Random walks in stock market prices. Financial analysts journal, 51(1):75--80.
[7]
Forbes, K. J. and Rigobon, R. (2010). No contagion, only interdependence: Measuring stock market comovements. Journal of Finance, 57(5):2223--2261.
[8]
French, K. R., Schwert, G. W., and Stambaugh, R. F. (1987). Expected stock returns and volatility. Journal of financial Economics, 19(1):3--29.
[9]
Girdzijauskas, S. and Štreimikiene, D. (2009). Application of logistic models for stock market bubbles analysis. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(1):45--51.
[10]
Hassan, M. R. and Nath, B. (2005). Stock market forecasting using hidden markov model: a new approach. In 5th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA'05), pages 192--196. IEEE.
[11]
Hassan, M. R., Nath, B., and Kirley, M. (2007). A fusion model of hmm, ann and ga for stock market forecasting. Expert systems with Applications, 33(1):171--180.
[12]
Hu, J., Brown, M. K., and Turin, W. (1996). Hmm based online handwriting recognition. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 18(10):1039--1045.
[13]
Huang, B.-N., Yang, C.-W., and Hu, J. W.-S. (2000). Causality and cointegration of stock markets among the united states, japan and the south china growth triangle. International Review of Financial Analysis, 9(3):281--297.
[14]
Hyndman, R. J., Khandakar, Y., et al. (2007). Automatic time series for forecasting: the forecast package for R. Number 6/07. Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
[15]
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning, volume 112. Springer.
[16]
Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. Journal of economic perspectives, 17(1):59--82.
[17]
Norris, J. R. (1998). Markov chains. Number 2. Cambridge university press.
[18]
Oliver, N. M., Rosario, B., and Pentland, A. P. (2000). A bayesian computer vision system for modeling human interactions. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 22(8):831--843.
[19]
Patel, J., Shah, S., Thakkar, P., and Kotecha, K. (2015). Predicting stock market index using fusion of machine learning techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(4):2162--2172.
[20]
Platt, J. et al. (1999). Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. Advances in large margin classifiers, 10(3):61--74.
[21]
Schwarz, G. et al. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The annals of statistics, 6(2):461--464.
[22]
Setiawan, B. (2018). Lasso technique application in stock market modelling: An empirical evidence in indonesia. Sriwijaya International Journal of Dynamic Economics and Business, 2(1):51--62.
[23]
Stratonovich, R. L. (1965). Conditional markov processes. In Non-linear transformations of stochastic processes, pages 427--453. Elsevier.
[24]
Su, R., Zhao, Y., Yi, R., and Dutta, A. (2012). Persistence in mutual fund returns: Evidence from china. International
[25]
Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(13).
[26]
Welch, L. R. (2003). Hidden markov models and the baum-welch algorithm. IEEE Information Theory Society Newsletter, 53(4):10--13.
[27]
Zamowitz, V. and Boschan, C. (1975). Cyclical indicators: An evaluation and new leading indexes. Business Conditions Digest, 5:5--22.
[28]
Zou, H. and Hastie, T. (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the royal statistical society: series B (statistical methodology), 67(2):301--320.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Kirli ve Temiz Tanker Endeksi Volatiliteleri ile BRIC Borsaları Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisiAnkara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi10.26745/ahbvuibfd.147058926:3(915-936)Online publication date: 25-Dec-2024

Index Terms

  1. Inference of the Us and Chinese Stock Markets Using Statistical and Computational Methods

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IC4E '20: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning
    January 2020
    441 pages
    ISBN:9781450372947
    DOI:10.1145/3377571
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    In-Cooperation

    • Ritsumeikan University: Ritsumeikan University

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 May 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. CSI 300
    2. Efficient market hypothesis
    3. S&P 500
    4. Statistical and computational methods

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    IC4E 2020

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Kirli ve Temiz Tanker Endeksi Volatiliteleri ile BRIC Borsaları Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisiAnkara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi10.26745/ahbvuibfd.147058926:3(915-936)Online publication date: 25-Dec-2024

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media