skip to main content
10.1145/3377571.3377630acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Peer Ratings of Grade 11 Students Using Technology and Traditional Materials in Their Oral Presentations

Published: 03 May 2020 Publication History

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the peer ratings of 72 Grade 11 students in their report presentations in English for Academic and Professional Purposes (EAPP) where they used technology and traditional materials. Selected through purposive sampling, they were asked to submit the ratings given by their peers in the following categories: presentations using technology, presentations using traditional materials, and presentations using combined technology and traditional materials. Findings showed that regardless of the type of instructional materials used, males and females did not differ in their performance. However, a significant difference existed between using traditional materials and using a combination of technology and traditional materials, which indicates that there is a significant effect in the performance of students (F-value=6.642; p-value=.002). Students obtained the lowest performance with the use of traditional materials alone, but highest with the combination of technology and traditional materials. Focus group discussions with six students and eight teachers were conducted. Themes generated from both groups include delivery of report presentations, materials used, strengths and weaknesses of traditional and technology materials, and performance of students using technology. From the semi-structured questionnaire, 70 out of 72 students claimed that they performed better with the combination of technology and traditional materials. Thus, both technology and traditional materials still play an important role in a Filipino learning environment.

References

[1]
Baek, Y, Jung, J., and Kim, B. 2008. What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education. 50, 1 (Jan. 2008), 224--234.
[2]
Culatta, R. 2019. Constructivist theory (Jerome Bruner). Retrieved from https://www.instructionaldesign.org/ theories/constructivist/.
[3]
Devlin, T. J., Feldhaus, C.R., and Bentrem, K.M. 2013. The evolving classroom: a study of traditional and technology based instruction in a stem classroom. Journal of Technology Education. 25, 1(Sept. 2013), 342013), 34--54.
[4]
Dutta, S., & Bilbao-Osorio, B. 2012. Global information technology report 2012. Living in a hyper-connected world. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/Global_IT_ Report_2012.pdf.
[5]
Francis, J. 2017.The Effects of Technology on Student Motivation and Engagement in Classroom-Based Learning. Doctoral Dissertation. University of New England.
[6]
Granito, M. and Chernobilsky, E. 2012. The effect of technology on a student's motivation and knowledge retention. In NERA Conference Proceedings (2012.17). http://digitalcommons.uconn. edu/nera_2012/ 17.
[7]
Karsenti, T. and Fievez, A. 2013. The iPad in Education: Uses, Benefits, and Challenges - A Survey of 6,057 Students and 302 Teachers in Quebec, Canada. Montreal, QC: CRIFPE, p.4.
[8]
Krukru, K. 2015. Effects of instrumental materials on students' academic performance. Social Studies in selected secondary schools in Nigeria, Munich, GRIN VERLAG, http://www.grin.com/document/338942.
[9]
Lavin, A. M., Korte, L., and Davies, T. L. 2009. The impact of classroom technology on student behavior on student behavior. Journal of Technology Reseach. 2,1 (Jan. 2009)1.
[10]
Mills, G. E. 2010. Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher. New York, NY: Pearson Publishing.
[11]
Montrieux, H., Vanderlinde, R., Schellens, T., and De Marez, L. 2015.Teaching and learning with mobile technology: a qualitative explorative study about the introduction of tablet devices in secondary education. PLoS ONE. 10,12 (Dec. 2015). e0144008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0144008.
[12]
Morgan, D.L. and Krueger, R.A. 2000. The Focus Group Kit. CA, Sage: Thousand Oaks.
[13]
Ramey, K. 2013. The use of technology - in education and teaching process. Retrieved from https://www.use of technology.com/the-use-of-technology-in-education/.
[14]
Richmond, A.S. and Troisi, J.D. 2018. Technology in the classroom: what the research tells. Retrieved from https:// www. insidehighered.com/sites/default/server files/media/ I Stock.
[15]
Towne, T. N. 2018. Exploring the Phenomenon of Secondary Teachers Integrating the LMS Canvas in a Blended-Learning Course. Doctoral dissertation. Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA.
[16]
Young, R. 2008. Using Technology Tools in the Public School Classroom. Univ. of Wisconsin, Menomonie, Wi

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
IC4E '20: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning
January 2020
441 pages
ISBN:9781450372947
DOI:10.1145/3377571
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • Ritsumeikan University: Ritsumeikan University

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 May 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. learning environment
  2. ratings
  3. report presentations
  4. technology
  5. traditional materials

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

IC4E 2020

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 31
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media