research-article

Development and Validation of Next Generation Blended Learning Environment Questionnaire for Senior High School Students

Authors:

Salvador John M. Magalong,

Maricar S. PrudenteAuthors Info & Claims

IC4E '20: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning

Pages 213 - 217

https://doi.org/10.1145/3377571.3379434

Published: 03 May 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In the past years, the use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) has been regarded as an advantageous means for handling administrative duties in classroom instructions rather than being successful in facilitating learning. Although several studies have reported that the utilization of certain LMSs have resulted to positive effects on students' achievement and perceptions, the LMS's capabilities and limitations make it limited for teachers to develop new pedagogical approaches in maximizing its use in promoting effective and efficient teaching-learning processes. This study aimed to develop and validate a scale for evaluating a digital environment when using LMSs in supporting learning directly. The developed Next Generation Blended Learning Environment Questionnaire (NxGBLEQ) is a four-point Likert scale and originally had 52 questions. For further validation, 4 Science Education experts validated the questionnaire, and it was administered to 326 senior high school students. Consistent with the adopted theoretical framework, the 35-item NxGBLEQ comprised 5 factors: (1) interoperability and integration; (2) personalization; (3) analytics, advising, and learning assessment; (4) collaboration, and (5) accessibility and universal design. The entire scale and factors demonstrated a satisfactory level of internal reliability, and senior high school students could use it.

References

[1]

Calamlam, J. 2018. 21st century learning module assessment tool (21STCELMAT). Manuscript submitted for publication.

[2]

Duman, G., Kural Baykan, A., Koroglu, G. N., Yilmaz, S., & Erdogan, M. (2014). An Investigation of Prospective Teachers' Attitudes toward Educational Reforms in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(2), 622--628. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270689088

[3]

Sahrir, M. S., Zainuddin, N., & Nasir, M. S. (2016). Learning Preference among Arabic Language Learners via Mobile Learning Management System Platform (Mobile LMS) Using I-Taleem. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Muhammad_Sahrir/publication/283349320

[4]

Mehta, N. B., Hull, A. L., Young, J. B., & Stoller, J. K. (2013). Just imagine: new paradigms for medical education. Academic Medicine, 88(10), 1418--1423.

[5]

Shute, V. J., & Becker, B. J. (2010). Innovative assessment for the 21st century. New York: Springer.

[6]

Zhao, Y. (2015). A world at risk: An imperative for a paradigm shift to cultivate 21st century learners. Society, 52(2), 129--135.

[7]

Wedlock, B. C., & Growe, R. (2017). The technology driven student: How to apply Bloom's revised taxonomy to the digital generations. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 7(1), 25--34.

[8]

Cheong, C., Filippou, J., Cheong, F., Pirker, J., & Gütl, C. (2016, September). Using Persuasive System Design Principles to Evaluate Two Next Generation Digital Learning Environments. In International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (pp. 255--268). Springer, Cham.

[9]

Ossiannilsson, E., Eriksen, N. E., & Rung-Hoch, N. (2017). Inspired Learning-The Next Generation Digital Learning Environment (NGDLE). In CSEDU (2) (pp. 263--267).

[10]

Kabassi, K., Dragonas, I., Ntouzevits, A., Pomonis, T., Papastathopoulos, G., and Vozaitis, Y. (2016). Evaluating a learning management system for blended learning in Greek higher education. Springer Plus, 5(1), 1.

[11]

Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433--441.

[12]

Sarmiento, C. P. (2017). Student perceptions of online homework in mathematics of accounting and finance. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 1122--1125.

[13]

Trestini, M. (2018). Modeling of Next Generation Digital Learning Environments: Complex Systems Theory. John Wiley & Sons.

[14]

Cook, R., & Obexer, R. (2014). A time for everything: reviewing an institution's virtual learning environment. In B. Hegarty, J. McDonald, & S.-K. Loke (Eds.), Rhetoric and Reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology. Proceedings ascilite Dunedin 2014 (pp. 69--76).

[15]

Brown, M., Dehoney, J., and Millichap, N. (2015). The next generation digital learning environment: A report on research. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative paper.

[16]

"7 Things You Should Know About NGDLE." (2015). EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. Retrieved from: https://library.educause.edu/resources/2015/12/7-things-you-should-know-about-ngdle

[17]

Maas, B., Abel, R., Suess, J., & O'Brien, J. (2016). Next-Generation Digital Learning Environments: Closer Than You Think. Communication présentée au Croosroads where the past meets the future, Thessalo-niki, Grèce. Recuperado de: http://www. eunis. org/eunis2016/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2016/03/EUNIS2016_paper_4. pdf.

[18]

Long, P. D., & Mott, J. (2017). The N2GDLE Vision. Next" Next Generation Digital Learning Environment." EDUCAUSE.

[19]

Panagiotidis, P. (2018). Technologies and Language Learning: Towards Next Generation Digital Learning Environments. 11th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. November 2018 (pp. 1068--1617)

[20]

Jakimoski, K. (2016). Challenges of interoperability and integration in education information systems. International Journal of Database and Theory and Application, 9(2), 33--46.

[21]

Reigeluth, C. M., Aslan, S., Chen, Z., Dutta, P., Huh, Y., Lee, D., ... & Watson, S. L. (2015). Personalized integrated educational system: Technology functions for the learner-centered paradigm of education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(3), 459--496.

[22]

Queirós, R., Leal, J. P., & Paiva, J. C. (2016). Integrating rich learning applications in lms. In State-of-the-art and future directions of smart learning (pp. 381--386). Springer, Singapore.

[23]

Jacobs, J. (2016). High school of the future: Cutting-edge model capitalizes on blended learning to take personalization further. Education Next, 16(3), 44--51.

[24]

Farrell, G. F. (2018). Using a blended learning model to facilitate personalization of reading instruction for primary students.

[25]

Bavonese, J. L., Connor, C., Wheat, V., Beard, L., & Owens, L. A. (2017). Collaboration Opportunities within University Teacher Education Programs. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 4(2), 72--79.

[26]

Barber, W., King, S., & Buchanan, S. (2015). Problem Based Learning and Authentic Assessment in Digital Pedagogy: Embracing the Role of Collaborative Communities. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(2), 59--67.

[27]

Ellis, R. A., Pardo, A., & Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments-Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers & Education, 102, 90--102.

Digital Library

[28]

Dalton, E. M. (2017). Beyond Universal Design for Learning: Guiding Principles to Reduce Barriers to Digital & Media Literacy Competence. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 9(2), 17--29.

[29]

Basham, J. D., Smith, S. J., & Satter, A. L. (2016). Universal design for learning: Scanning for alignment in K-12 blended and fully online learning materials. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31(3), 147--155.

[30]

Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Babin, B.J., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (2006) Multivariate data Analysis. Ed.Ke-6.NewJersey:Pearson Educational International.

Cited By

Karimian ZBarkhor AMehrabi MKhojasteh L(2023)Which virtual education methods do e‑students prefer? Design and validation of Virtual Education Preferences Questionnaire (VEPQ)BMC Medical Education10.1186/s12909-023-04687-223:1Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04687-2
Calamlam JFerran FMacabali L(2021)Perception on research methods course’s online environment and self-regulated learning during the COVID-19 pandemicE-Learning and Digital Media10.1177/2042753021102772219:1(93-119)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2021
https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211027722

Index Terms

Development and Validation of Next Generation Blended Learning Environment Questionnaire for Senior High School Students
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
    1. E-learning

Recommendations

Integrating Blended Learning into Situational Writing for Vocational High School Students

This study aims to explore vocational high school students' attitudes toward integrating blended learning into situational writing, and the learning effectiveness of that integration. A total of 84 vocational high students were divided into an ...
Developing Independent Learning Skills for Postgraduate Students through Blended Learning Environment

Independent learning is a critical learning strategy in higher education, especially in the blended learning environment BLE. This paper investigates the relevance and suitability of enhanced teaching, learning and assessment TLA activities within the ...
Effects of Problem-Based Learning and Blended Learning Strategies on Senior Secondary School Students' Learning Outcomes in Algebra

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

IC4E '20: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning

January 2020

441 pages

ISBN:9781450372947

DOI:10.1145/3377571

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Ritsumeikan University: Ritsumeikan University

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 May 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

IC4E 2020

IC4E 2020: 2020 the 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning

January 10 - 12, 2020

Osaka, Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
135
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)8
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Karimian ZBarkhor AMehrabi MKhojasteh L(2023)Which virtual education methods do e‑students prefer? Design and validation of Virtual Education Preferences Questionnaire (VEPQ)BMC Medical Education10.1186/s12909-023-04687-223:1Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04687-2
Calamlam JFerran FMacabali L(2021)Perception on research methods course’s online environment and self-regulated learning during the COVID-19 pandemicE-Learning and Digital Media10.1177/2042753021102772219:1(93-119)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2021
https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211027722

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten