skip to main content
10.1145/3377571.3379440acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Factors Influencing Vietnamese Dentistry Students' Autonomy: A Q-Methodology Study

Published: 03 May 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Objectives: Students' self-learning ability is an important factor that directly influences learning outcomes. Studies of students' self-learning problems have been widely conducted on students in different majors in Vietnam but not on dental students. The purpose of the current study is to explore factors influencing dentistry freshmen's autonomy in Vietnam by using Q-methodology. Methods: Q-methodology was applied to identify the factors affecting learners' autonomy. A Q-sample of 47 statements was developed based on the review of the literature and student interviews. The study recruited 29 first-year students from Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy. They were required to sort statements of Q-sample into a Q-distribution grid according to the degree of influence of the factors on their self-learning. The data collected were analyzed using PQ Method software version 2.35. Results: There were two main factors affecting students' autonomy: Factor 1-autonomy-supportive environment, and Factor 2-smartphone usage, which accounted for 35% of the total variance of study. Conclusions: Lacking of clear teachers' guidance, assessment on self-learner study and abusing of social apps on smartphone may affect student autonomy. Especially, freshmen do not recognise the important of subjects in basic science with their future job for becoming a doctor. The findings may help students, teachers, and education managers to find the best solutions to improve learner autonomy problems.

References

[1]
Wright J. Schooling for new times. Crit Inq Probl Phys Educ [Internet]. 2004; Available from: http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=edupapers
[2]
Nepal English Language Teachers' Association. International Conference (16th: 2011: Kathmandu N, Raj Awasthi J, Nepal English Language Teachers' Association. NELTA Conference proceedings - 2011. J NELTA [Internet]. 2011;16(1-2):156. Available from: https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/NELTA/article/view/6126/5023
[3]
Sandars J. The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 44. Med Teach. 2009;31(8):685--95.
[4]
Arnold, L. Understanding and promoting autonomy in U.K. online higher education. The International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 2006; 3, 33--46.
[5]
Kitts K. The Paradox of Middle and High School Students' Attitudes Towards Science Versus Their Attitudes About Science as a Career. J Geosci Educ. 2011;57(2):159--64.
[6]
Prokop P, Tunnicliffe SD, Kubiatko M, Hornackova A, Usak M. The role of teacher in students' attitudes to and achievement in palaeontology. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B-Social Educ Stud. 2011;3(1-2):29--45.
[7]
Brown S. A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity. Operant Subj. 1993;16(April/July):91--138.
[8]
Young JM, Shepardson DP. Using Q methodology to investigate undergraduate students' attitudes toward the geosciences. Sci Educ. 2018;102(1):195--214.
[9]
Bhakta B, Tennant A, Horton M, Lawton G, Andrich D. Using item response theory to explore the psychometric properties of extended matching questions examination in undergraduate medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5:1--13.
[10]
Meade LB, Caverzagie KJ, Swing SR, Jones RR, O'Malley CW, Yamazaki K, et al. Playing With Curricular Milestones in the Educational Sandbox. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1142--8.
[11]
Fokkema JPI, Scheele F, Westerman M, Van Exel J, Scherpbier AJJA, Van Der Vleuten CPM, et al. Perceived effects of innovations in postgraduate medical education: A Q study focusing on workplace-based assessment. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1259--66.
[12]
Watts S. Develop a Q methodological study. Educ Prim Care. 2015;26(6):435--7.
[13]
Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol. 2005;2(1):67--91.
[14]
Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method and Interpretation. London: Sage Publications. 2012.
[15]
Webler TSD. Using Q Method to Reveal Social Perspectives in Environmental Research Using Q Method to Reveal Social Perspectives in Environmental Research. 2009;(November 2016):1--53.
[16]
Dziopa F, Ahern K. A systematic literature review of the applications of Q-technique and its methodology. Methodology. 2011;7(2):39--55.
[17]
Schmolck, P. PQMethod, version 2.35. Retrieved from https://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod. 2014
[18]
Kaiser HF. The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis. Educ Psychol Meas [Internet]. 1960;20(1):141--51. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001316446002000116
[19]
LOUIS GUTTMAN. Some Necessary Conditions for Common-Factor Analysis. Psychometrika. 1954;19(2):149--60.
[20]
Brown SR. Political Subjectivity. 1980. 355 p.
[21]
Webb C. Feminist methodology in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 1984;9(3):249--56.
[22]
Park B, Knörzer L, Plass JL, Brünken R. Emotional design and positive emotions in multimedia learning: An eyetracking study on the use of anthropomorphisms. Comput Educ [Internet]. 2015;86:30--42. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.016
[23]
Plass JL, Heidig S, Hayward EO, Homer BD, Um E. Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learn Instr. 2014;29:128--40.
[24]
Um ER, Plass JL, Hayward EO, Homer BD. Emotional Design in Multimedia Learning. J Educ Psychol. 2012;104(2):485--98.
[25]
Pudas AK. Investigating possibilities to develop textbooks to implement global education in basic education instruction. Iartem E-Journal. 2013;5(2):1--22.
[26]
Khosravani M, Khosravani M, Khorashadyzadeh A. Analyzing the effects of Iranian EFL textbooks on developing learners' life skills. English Lang Teach. 2014;7(6):54--67.
[27]
Dogan D, Zekiye MT. Are the skills really integrated in coursebooks? A sample case- Yes You Can A1.2. Educ Res Rev. 2015;10(12):1599--632.
[28]
Behnke Y. The Palgrave Handbook of Textbook Studies. Palgrave Handb Textb Stud. 2018;(July).
[29]
Nepal B, Maharjan R. Effect of School's Physical Facilities on Learning and Outcomes of Students in Nepal. J Stud Manag Plan [Internet]. 2015;1(6):266--79. Available from: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/article/view/2448
[30]
Abdel Meguid E, Collins M. Students' perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;Volume 8:229--41.
[31]
Zhong QM. The evolution of learner autonomy in online environments: A case study in a New Zealand context. Stud Self-Access Learn J [Internet]. 2018;9(1):71--85. Available from: https://sisaljournal.org/
[32]
Kerdijk W, Cohen-Schotanus J, Mulder BF, Muntinghe FLH, Tio RA. Cumulative versus end-of-course assessment: Effects on self-study time and test performance. Med Educ. 2015;49(7):709--16.
[33]
Lee M-R. A Study on Effects of Mentoring Education Program by Advisor onto Adaptation and Relationship of University Freshmen. Asia-pacific J Converg Res Interchang. 2019;4(4):41--52.
[34]
Ekiti-state GA. Poor Reading Culture: A Barrier to Students ' Patronage of Libraries Selected Secondary School in Ado Local. 2010;4(2):450--61.
[35]
Kirschner PA, Karpinski AC. Facebook® and academic performance. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26(6):1237--45.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Factors affecting online MCQ test performance on cell structure among first-year Vietnamese healthcare studentsE-Learning and Digital Media10.1177/20427530251313770Online publication date: 10-Jan-2025

Index Terms

  1. Factors Influencing Vietnamese Dentistry Students' Autonomy: A Q-Methodology Study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IC4E '20: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning
      January 2020
      441 pages
      ISBN:9781450372947
      DOI:10.1145/3377571
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      In-Cooperation

      • Ritsumeikan University: Ritsumeikan University

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 03 May 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Autonomy
      2. dentistry students
      3. q-methodology
      4. self-learning
      5. vietnam

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      IC4E 2020

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2025)Factors affecting online MCQ test performance on cell structure among first-year Vietnamese healthcare studentsE-Learning and Digital Media10.1177/20427530251313770Online publication date: 10-Jan-2025

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media