ABSTRACT
Investors evaluate and make their decisions based on the financial statements of the company, thus they will be always concern about the quality of the external auditor's report. External auditors will express their opinion on the fairness of the financial statements. When there is a high audit quality, it gives a greater assurance of high financial reporting quality to the investor. Higher audit quality gives confidence to investor to make their decision on the financial reporting. However, some investors do not consider that the audit report is helpful in their decision- making process, while other users were of the opinion that the financial statements fail to satisfy their information needs. This indicates that the investors are losing their confidence and reliance on the audit reports. Therefore, this study is done to identify the major factors that will influence the audit quality of external auditor. Based on the past researchers work it was identified corporate governance, size of audit firm and industry specialization are some of the major factors that affect the audit quality. This study is done to confirm the same factors are also applicable to the audit firm in Malaysia. The study was conducted among 30 targeted audit firms in Klang Valley, Malaysia, since most of the audit firms in Malaysia are situated here. Questionnaires were sent out to these firms and the results were analysed using the SPSS tools. The results indicate that factors such as corporate governance, size of audit firm and industry specialization have a positive relationship with the audit quality of external auditor. This research will be beneficial to the external auditor to understand the important of the corporate governance, size of audit firm and industry specialization when comes to the quality and reliability of the financial information by the users as well as enhance the credibility of the organizations.
- Al-Khaddash, H., Al Nawas, R., & Ramadan, A. 2013. Factors affecting the quality of auditing: The case of Jordanian commercial banks. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(11).Google Scholar
- Government Accountability Office. 2008. Audits of public companies: Continued concentration in audit market for large public companies does not call for immediate action.Google Scholar
- Washington, DC.Enofe Dr A. O., Nbgame Okunega Dr C., & Ediae E. C. 2013. Audit Quality and Auditors Independence in Nigeria: An Empirical Evaluation. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(11).Google Scholar
- Hay, D., & Knechel, W. R. 2010. The effects of advertising and solicitation on audit fees. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(1), 60--81.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shafie, R., Hussin, W. N. W., Yusof, M. A. M., & Hussain, M. H. M. 2009. Audit firm tenure and auditor reporting quality: Evidence in Malaysia. International business research, 2(2), 99Google Scholar
- Goodwin-Stewart, J., & Kent, P. 2006. Relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics and internal audit. Accounting & Finance, 46(3), 387--404.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pallant, J., & Pallant, J. 2010. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (No. 001.6425 P3).Google Scholar
- Yasin, F. M., & Nelson, S. P. 2012. Audit committee and internal audit: implications on audit quality. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 20(2), 187.Google Scholar
- Malaysian market. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(7), 716--728.Google Scholar
- DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 189--199.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Siddiqui, J., Zaman, M., & Khan, A. 2013. Do Big-Four affiliates earn audit fee premiums in emerging markets?. Advances in Accounting, 29(2), 332--342.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Numan, W., & Willekens, M. 2012. An empirical test of spatial competition in the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1), 450--465.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chin, C. L., & Chi, H. Y. 2009. Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729--765.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bliss, M. A., Muniandy, B., & Majid, A. 2007. CEO duality, audit committee effectiveness and audit risks: A study of the Columns on Last Page Should Be Made As Close As Possible to Equal Length.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Factors Affect the Audit Quality of External Auditor at Klang Valley
Recommendations
The Impact of Auditor's Competency, Audit Risk, and Professional Skepticism to Audit Quality in Fraud Detection Using Remote Audit
ICIBE '22: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Industrial and Business EngineeringThe purpose of this study was to determine the effect of auditors' professional skepticism, audit risk, and auditor competence on audit quality in conducting remote audits in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. To determine this effect, the researcher ...
The Effect of Information Technology Audit on the Audit Quality in Detecting Fraud Using the Competence of the Auditor as a Moderation Variable
ICIBE '20: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Industrial and Business EngineeringThe development of technology in the time of Covid-19 pandemic has affected a lot of accounting professions, for instance, auditors. In doing their field works at the moment, a lot of auditors rely on technology to ensure the good quality of their audit ...
Factors Affecting External Audit Quality In Malaysia
EBIMCS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer ScienceThe aims of this study are to understand the importance of audit quality and determine potential factors that might affect the external audit quality and also to highlight its importance of maintaining the external audit quality in Malaysia. This work ...
Comments