skip to main content
10.1145/3377817.3377821acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Factors Affect the Audit Quality of External Auditor at Klang Valley

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Investors evaluate and make their decisions based on the financial statements of the company, thus they will be always concern about the quality of the external auditor's report. External auditors will express their opinion on the fairness of the financial statements. When there is a high audit quality, it gives a greater assurance of high financial reporting quality to the investor. Higher audit quality gives confidence to investor to make their decision on the financial reporting. However, some investors do not consider that the audit report is helpful in their decision- making process, while other users were of the opinion that the financial statements fail to satisfy their information needs. This indicates that the investors are losing their confidence and reliance on the audit reports. Therefore, this study is done to identify the major factors that will influence the audit quality of external auditor. Based on the past researchers work it was identified corporate governance, size of audit firm and industry specialization are some of the major factors that affect the audit quality. This study is done to confirm the same factors are also applicable to the audit firm in Malaysia. The study was conducted among 30 targeted audit firms in Klang Valley, Malaysia, since most of the audit firms in Malaysia are situated here. Questionnaires were sent out to these firms and the results were analysed using the SPSS tools. The results indicate that factors such as corporate governance, size of audit firm and industry specialization have a positive relationship with the audit quality of external auditor. This research will be beneficial to the external auditor to understand the important of the corporate governance, size of audit firm and industry specialization when comes to the quality and reliability of the financial information by the users as well as enhance the credibility of the organizations.

References

  1. Al-Khaddash, H., Al Nawas, R., & Ramadan, A. 2013. Factors affecting the quality of auditing: The case of Jordanian commercial banks. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Government Accountability Office. 2008. Audits of public companies: Continued concentration in audit market for large public companies does not call for immediate action.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Washington, DC.Enofe Dr A. O., Nbgame Okunega Dr C., & Ediae E. C. 2013. Audit Quality and Auditors Independence in Nigeria: An Empirical Evaluation. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hay, D., & Knechel, W. R. 2010. The effects of advertising and solicitation on audit fees. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(1), 60--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Shafie, R., Hussin, W. N. W., Yusof, M. A. M., & Hussain, M. H. M. 2009. Audit firm tenure and auditor reporting quality: Evidence in Malaysia. International business research, 2(2), 99Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodwin-Stewart, J., & Kent, P. 2006. Relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics and internal audit. Accounting & Finance, 46(3), 387--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Pallant, J., & Pallant, J. 2010. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (No. 001.6425 P3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yasin, F. M., & Nelson, S. P. 2012. Audit committee and internal audit: implications on audit quality. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 20(2), 187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Malaysian market. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(7), 716--728.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 189--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Siddiqui, J., Zaman, M., & Khan, A. 2013. Do Big-Four affiliates earn audit fee premiums in emerging markets?. Advances in Accounting, 29(2), 332--342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Numan, W., & Willekens, M. 2012. An empirical test of spatial competition in the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1), 450--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chin, C. L., & Chi, H. Y. 2009. Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729--765.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Bliss, M. A., Muniandy, B., & Majid, A. 2007. CEO duality, audit committee effectiveness and audit risks: A study of the Columns on Last Page Should Be Made As Close As Possible to Equal Length.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Factors Affect the Audit Quality of External Auditor at Klang Valley

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EBIMCS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
      August 2019
      175 pages
      ISBN:9781450366496
      DOI:10.1145/3377817

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 March 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      EBIMCS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate31of142submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate143of708submissions,20%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader