skip to main content
10.1145/3377817.3377822acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Factors Affecting External Audit Quality In Malaysia

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study are to understand the importance of audit quality and determine potential factors that might affect the external audit quality and also to highlight its importance of maintaining the external audit quality in Malaysia. This work will examine the effect of size of audit firm, audit tenure and industry specialization on external audit quality in Malaysia.This work was done based on quantitative research approach. In this study, a survey questionnaire is used as a purpose of obtaining data from respondents. The online questionnaires was distributed to fifty auditing firms in Malaysia which has been chosen randomly. SPSS software was used for the data analysis and data were analyzed in terms of Pearson Correlation Analysis and Multiple Regression. The result showed that there is weak positive relationship between the size of audit firm, audit tenure and industry specialization on external audit quality in Malaysia.The size of audit firm has a positive relationship with external audit quality as the correlation coefficient (r) obtained is 0.366. the correlation coefficient, r value of 0.383 indicates a weak positive relationship between audit tenure and external audit quality in Malaysia. The industry specialization has a direct influence on the external audit quality because the correlation coefficient (r) obtained from Pearson correlation analysis is 0.772.

References

  1. Ismail, H., & Theng, U. C. (2015). Auditing the Auditors: Has the Establishment of the Audit Oversight Board Affected Audit Quality?. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1S), 360--365.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mostafa Mohamed, D., & Hussien Habib, M. (2013). Auditor independence, audit quality and the mandatory auditor rotation in Egypt. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues. 6(2), 116--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ismail, H., & Mustapha, M. (2015). Auditing the Auditors: The Audit Oversight Board and Regulating Audit Quality in Malaysia. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 11(3), 138--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Power, M. K., & Gendron, Y. (2015). Qualitative research in auditing: A methodological roadmap. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(2), 147--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Brown, P., Preiato, J., & Tarca, A. (2014). Measuring country differences in enforcement of accounting standards: An audit and enforcement proxy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(1-2), 1--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Vanstraelen, A., & Schelleman, C. (2017). Auditing private companies: what do we know?. Accounting and Business Research, 47(5), 565--584.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fazli Aghghaleh, S., Muhammaddun Mohamed, Z., & Ahmad, A. (2014). The effects of personal and organizational factors on role ambiguity amongst internal auditors. International Journal of Auditing, 18(2), 105--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Abedalqader Al-Thuneibat, A., Tawfiq Ibrahim Al Issa, R., & Ata Baker, R. A. (2011). Do audit tenure and firm size contribute to audit quality? Empirical evidence from Jordan. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(4), 317--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Sikka, P., & Willmott, H. (1995). The power of independence: defending and extending the jurisdiction of accounting in the UK. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(6), 547--581.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kassem, R., & Higson, A. W. (2016). External auditors and corporate corruption: Implications for external audit regulators. Current Issues in Auditing, 10(1), P1--P10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Chi, W., Lisic, L. L., & Pevzner, M. (2011). Is enhanced audit quality associated with greater real earnings management?. Accounting Horizons, 25(2), 315--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A journal of practice & theory, 30(2), 125--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bauwhede, H. V., & Willekens, M. (2004). Evidence on (the lack of) audit-quality differentiation in the private client segment of the Belgian audit market. European accounting review, 13(3), 501--522.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yasar, A. (2013). Big Four auditors' audit quality and earnings management: Evidence from Turkish Stock Market. International journal of business and social science, 4(17).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sundgren, S., & Svanström, T. (2013). Audit office size, audit quality and audit pricing: evidence from small-and medium-sized enterprises. Accounting and Business Research, 43(1), 31--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Bakar, N. B. A., & Ahmad, M. (2009). Auditor Independence: Malaysian Accountant's Perception. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(12), 129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Shafie, R., Hussin, W. N. W., Yusof, M. A. M., & Hussain, M. H. M. (2009). Audit firm tenure and auditor reporting quality: Evidence in Malaysia. International business research, 2(2), 99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Manry, D. L., Mock, T. J., & Turner, J. L. (2008). Does increased audit partner tenure reduce audit quality?. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23(4), 553--572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Donaldson, T. H. (2016). The treatment of intangibles: A banker's view. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Elder, R. J., Lowensohn, S., & Reck, J. L. (2015). Audit firm rotation, auditor specialization, and audit quality in the municipal audit context. Journal of Government & Nonprofit Accounting, 4(1), 73--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Zerni, M. (2012). Audit partner specialization and audit fees: Some evidence from Sweden. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 312--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Omar, N., Said, R., & Johari, Z. A. (2016). Corporate crimes in Malaysia: a profile analysis. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(2), 257--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mose, J. M., Njihia, J. M., & Magutu, P. O. (2013). The critical success factors and challenges in e-procurement adoption among large scale manufacturing firms in Nairobi, Kenya. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 9(13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sawan, N., & Alsaqqa, I. (2013). Audit firm size and quality: Does audit firm size influence audit quality in the Libyan oil industry?. African Journal of Business Management, 7(3), 213--226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Onwuchekwa, J. C., Erah, D. O., & Izedonmi, F. (2012). Mandatory audit rotation and audit quality: Survey of Southern Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3(8), 70--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Malik, Z. F., Arshed, N., Hassan, M. S., Rasheed, B., Kazmi, S. T. F. H., & Gulzar, M. (2017). The Impact of Auditor Tenure on Audit Quality: Evidence from Pakistan. Paradigms, 11(2), 202--209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu, L. L., Xie, X., Chang, Y. S., & Forgione, D. A. (2017). New clients, audit quality, and audit partner industry expertise: Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Auditing, 21(3), 288--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Factors Affecting External Audit Quality In Malaysia

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        EBIMCS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
        August 2019
        175 pages
        ISBN:9781450366496
        DOI:10.1145/3377817

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 March 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        EBIMCS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate31of142submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate143of708submissions,20%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader